Quote:8 predictions for the world in 2030 (from WEF 2016)

1. All products will have become services. “I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes,” (You will rent & will be delivered via Amazon drone)

2. There is a global price on carbon.

3. US dominance is over. We have a handful of global powers.

4. Farewell hospital, hello home-spital. Technology will have further disrupted disease, writes Melanie Walker, a medical doctor and World Bank advisor. The hospital as we know it will be on its way out...

5. We are eating much less meat. Rather like our grandparents, we will treat meat as a treat rather than a staple...

6. Today’s Syrian refugees will be 2030’s CEOs. (1300+ CEOs left in 2019) (a billion people will be displaced due to manufactured climate change and greener pastures are over here.)

7. The values that built the West will have been tested to breaking point.

8. “By the 2030s, we'll be ready to move humans toward the Red Planet.” What’s more, once we get there, we’ll probably discover evidence of alien life, writes Ellen Stofan, Chief Scientist at NASA.

Quote:Moscow: Russia’s military action in Ukraine is meant to put an end to the US-dominated world order, as per Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Washington has been seeking supremacy by imposing ad hoc rules and violating international law...

He was referring to America’s attempts to impose its own so-called “rules-based international order”, which have met with strong resistance from Moscow and Beijing.
Link

Quote:The Choice Between a U.S.-Led Rules-Based Order and a Chinese 'Might-Makes-Right' One Is False

A ready ability to use the phrase “rules-based international order” seems to have become a job requirement for a top position in the U.S. foreign-policy apparatus. One need look no further than Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s opening statement during his recent meeting with top Chinese officials. “Our administration is committed to leading with diplomacy to advance the interests of the United States and to strengthen the rules-based international order,” he said. The alternative, he continued, “is a world in which might makes right and winners take all, and that would be a far more violent and unstable world for all of us.” China, he seemed to be saying, is not only out to dismantle the U.S.-led order but also out to bring back the days of “might makes right.”

Quote:Although the “rules-based international order” is central to Australian strategy, what exactly this concept means remains a work very much in progress. For Australia to achieve its objectives for the order, it will have to get more specific.

But what does “rules-based order” mean?

The unsatisfying answer is that the concept is used in official discourse to mean many different things, and they’re not always complementary. Although the term “rules-based international order” was only coined after the Cold War, Canberra typically dates it to the aftermath of the Second World War and the institutions and norms – centred on the UN – that were established then. It is often credited with having delivered 70 years of peace and security.

Other recurring propositions are that the rules-based order has both constrained the use of power and depends on US power; that it could shape China’s rise and be shaped by China; and that it must be saved and must change.
The Interpreter

Quote:Technocracy: The Operating System For The New International Rules-Based Order

In this article, we will explore the true nature of the international rules-based order (IRBO) and examine the forces that shape it. We will consider if the narratives we are commonly fed stack up.

It is widely accepted that the IRBO is undergoing disruptive change. That transformation is often reported as an eastward shift in the balance of power between nation states.

It is said that this new, emerging international order will be founded upon a global multipolar system of sovereign states and international law. This new system allegedly stands in opposition to the fading, western “rules-based” model.

This time, rather than relying upon western imperialism, the new international law-based system will emphasise multipolar cooperation, trade and respect for national sovereignty. It will instead be led by a Eurasian economic and technological power-block.

The apparent, ongoing antagonism of geopolitics looks likely to maintain the East-West divide we are familiar with. However, what is now being framed as the multipolar order is, in reality, the multistakeholder order.

The Real IRBO
The IRBO can more accurately be described as a vehicle for a worldwide stakeholder capitalist network to manipulate nation states in pursuit of its own predominantly private, corporate agenda. Indeed, we might argue that is all it has ever been.

A truly global network of corporations, think-tanks, private foundations, intergovernmental organisations, NGOs and governments work in partnership to convert global policy agendas into policy and legislation at the national and local government level. This is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) and its reach extends to every nation.

Quote:Moscow: Russia’s military action in Ukraine is meant to put an end to the US-dominated world order, as per Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Washington has been seeking supremacy by imposing ad hoc rules and violating international law...

He was referring to America’s attempts to impose its own so-called “rules-based international order”, which have met with strong resistance from Moscow and Beijing.

Link

Quote:You will rent & will be delivered via Amazon drone

(04-13-2022, 06:50 AM)Ninurta Wrote: #5 on the WEF Wish List is laughable: "5. We are eating much less meat. Rather like our grandparents, we will treat meat as a treat rather than a staple..." I dunno where their grandparents lived, but I feel sorry for them. MY grandparents never set a meal without meat as a major component of the main course. Never. I come from a long line of carnivores. What's the point of raising critters if you can't eat them or use them in the effort to get other critters to eat? Their staples were beef, pork, chicken, home made butter and cheese, and produce out of the garden - corn, beans, squash, potatoes, cabbage, carrots, onions, and the list goes on. Grocery stores were just for wheat bread, flour to make wheat bread and biscuits, and coffee.

Own nothing? Even slaves were allowed to own things. How far beneath slavery has humanity sunk if it owns nothing but still has to pay the Masters for EVERYTHING as a "service"?

And this:

Quote:Moscow: Russia’s military action in Ukraine is meant to put an end to the US-dominated world order, as per Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Washington has been seeking supremacy by imposing ad hoc rules and violating international law...

He was referring to America’s attempts to impose its own so-called “rules-based international order”, which have met with strong resistance from Moscow and Beijing.

Link

I've been screaming for months now that the US should not engage in the matter of the Ukraine, that it's none off our concern, but no one listens. What the government is doing by engaging is allowing Putin to choose and set the battlefield. It's never a good idea to let your opponent choose and set the battlefield, because he will do the same thing you would have done had you had the balls to set the battlefield yourself - he will stack it in his favor. So the US will loose it's supremacy over Russia, and eventually it's sovereignty, all over a bitty little other corner section of the former USSR that no one, absolutely no one, would give a flying fuck about were they not issued orders to care about it from the media propaganda departments they cling to.

It boggle the mind. People are so willing to march into a fate worse than slavery that the said fate is really all they deserve. A people who will not defend their freedom and independence deserve to lose it.

Humanity is coming to and end. Homo sapiens is rapidly evolving into the next species in line... and I would call that new species homo servus - "slave man", but Eloi is easier to spell.


.

(04-13-2022, 04:02 AM)ancientlight Wrote: It will be a cold day in hell before they own anything that I currently own 
And with them also mentioning in the same predictions that humans will be moving to Mars by 2030 tells me that , hopefully, most of these 'predictions' are just their pipe dreams. 

(04-13-2022, 09:42 PM)EndtheMadnessNow Wrote: 100% agree with you on "meat" and was and still is the main course of every dinner. I come from a family of big game hunters and we all been eating meat since birth. After ~300,000 years and suddenly it's bad???

WEF & Co revolutionists are all about their technocrat wet dream. The scary part is not so much about what they want, but how many sheeple are cheering for it. The same gov/aristocrat tricks for thousands of years. We probably are a species with amnesia and yes they really do want to forever replace Homo sapiens with some transhumanoid dumb-down slave abomination race.