I stole this from ATS
but think it's very important to make sure this is spread all over the internet as fast as possible.
I can't/won't watch this , as I'll puke
So here:
Edit: I can't delete the ugly video it seems, but maybe it was not what was said (reading from ATS comments)
or how you look it : "
He did say reduce the number of people who can't afford medicine by 50%.
Has the price of medicine gone down, so half the world can afford it?
Or get rid of people and reach the same goal "
Either way, these jerks deserve misery
This was debunked on ATS. If you start around 2 minutes in, he says they want to reduce the number of people WHO CAN"T AFFORD medications to around 50% of the total world population. He doesn't say they want to reduce the population in anyway, just reduce the number of people who can't afford to get treatment. It is tricky wording (somewhat), he should have said that they want to have medication affordable for at least 50% of the world population.
I suppose it could be taken as you infer, maybe a Freudian slip, but given the context, that's not the plan.
(07-07-2022, 02:12 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: [ -> ]This was debunked on ATS. If you start around 2 minutes in, he says they want to reduce the number of people WHO CAN"T AFFORD medications to around 50% of the total world population. He doesn't say they want to reduce the population in anyway, just reduce the number of people who can't afford to get treatment. It is tricky wording (somewhat), he should have said that they want to have medication affordable for at least 50% of the world population.
I suppose it could be taken as you infer, maybe a Freudian slip, but given the context, that's not the plan.
Playing devil's advocate, maybe making sure more people can afford the medications is just another way to speed up the process.
I have trouble understanding why they want us to think they go to such great lengths to save us from disease, yet do little to nothing to help the working poor that fight the constant battle for food and homes.
They won't provide the sick and mentally ill with services, but they will pump them full of medications, usually paid for through some deal with the government.
Children, the elderly, the mentally ill, or impaired, are ignored, abused, and often killed daily, under government backed programs, that provide more for the handlers than for the patients, but they have a list over 20 miles long of all the medications they are forcing onto the parents, patients, and caregivers.
I see way too many young people with diagnoses of anxiety, PTSD, depression, bi-polar, just to name a few, and on a ton of medications. They start giving these medications to children in elementary school, how the hell could they not be drug addicts before they reach adulthood?
The gate to hell is at the door of the pharmaceutical companies. If there was a true war on drugs, you would have to start at the top, with our government, the biggest drug dealer on this planet.
(07-07-2022, 02:12 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: [ -> ]This was debunked on ATS. If you start around 2 minutes in, he says they want to reduce the number of people WHO CAN"T AFFORD medications to around 50% of the total world population. He doesn't say they want to reduce the population in anyway, just reduce the number of people who can't afford to get treatment. It is tricky wording (somewhat), he should have said that they want to have medication affordable for at least 50% of the world population.
I suppose it could be taken as you infer, maybe a Freudian slip, but given the context, that's not the plan.
Yes, that's why I tried to edit. I also said I never watched the video as they make me want to vomit.
I still don't trust them, they are psychopaths in it for themselves only.
So, like NightskyB4Dawn says, dubious at best.
Also, one goal of agenda2030 was to reduce the world population to 'sustainable levels' :barf:
(07-07-2022, 06:43 PM)ancientlight Wrote: [ -> ]Also, one goal of agenda2030 was to reduce the world population to 'sustainable levels' :barf:
A well-timed nuke on Davos would be a great start at that population reduction.
.
(07-07-2022, 02:01 PM)ancientlight Wrote: [ -> ]I stole this from ATS but think it's very important to make sure this is spread all over the internet as fast as possible.
I can't/won't watch this , as I'll puke
So here:
Edit: I can't delete the ugly video it seems, but maybe it was not what was said (reading from ATS comments)
or how you look it : "He did say reduce the number of people who can't afford medicine by 50%.
Has the price of medicine gone down, so half the world can afford it?
Or get rid of people and reach the same goal "
Either way, these jerks deserve misery
Nope. It took me 2 seconds to find this:
Pfizer CEO did not say he wanted to decrease population by 50% - Full Fact
The video was edited. I wish people would check before putting this kind of garbage on here. The fact that it came from ATS just makes it that much more of a shitshow.