Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Downing Street Christmas Party: Busted
#1
I don't live in London or the UK but that doesn't matter here. This is applicable anywhere this BS rears its head. Rules for thee, not for me. 

In this case, are the Police (funded by taxpayers) there to serve the public? Or are they there to serve as some praetorian muscle for Boris and h 




It would behoove those working ostensibly for the public to remember the public is not going anywhere when there is a sea change. 


[Image: heads-swastikas-france-reprisals.jpg]
#2
It's a bit of a 'sticky-wicket' for ol' Boris and his buddies. Last Christmas, they held -in-and-around that period,
eight 'get-togethers' that many would call parties. Even though he ordered businesses to close and families to
limit their Yuletide experience, he -like many of the Journalists that write the shite that he sort-of-says, just had
a Christmas like the others before.

The problem when doing one of these half-hearted Chy-na impersonations is that the ones you're oppressing
need to be generations of new and non-war-aware people who think real life is like YouTube and not like reality.
Too many old ones never fell to the virus and they managed to tell the young 'uns that politicians will give you
half what you want, but take everything in the end.
BoJo never counted on the immune-system fighting back as hard as it did.

The British public don't just believe in him anymore, they're bored with his rulings and it could well threaten his
Conservatory Party's future. Then it's not giggles and newspaper propaganda, it's a voter with a memory.
He was elected for his willingness to get Brexit done and the people who chose him knew they were getting
a clown. Now that clown is overstaying his welcome and not because of his behind-the-scenes-parties and
Police assistance, but due to his poor attempts to tell the UK public that the Mandela Flu is lethal.

But it's the same as the US, the old two-party situation. On one hand you have the Tories, a group that have
traditionally adhered to the old-boys network and frown at the working-classes. Then there is the Labour Party
who -as long as you have blue-hair and will constantly steer a conversation towards genitals, now are also a
laughing-stock and frown when the working-classes ask to be represented.

London Upper-Middle-Class and London Middle-Class... that's why the media Coof narrative is always about closing
theatres and restaurants. Do you think the working-class look on these as luxuries or things you go to weekly? 
tinywondering
(Stifling rant!)
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#3
(12-22-2021, 08:09 PM)BIAD Wrote: It's a bit of a 'sticky-wicket' for ol' Boris and his buddies. Last Christmas, they held -in-and-around that period,
eight 'get-togethers' that many would call parties. Even though he ordered businesses to close and families to
limit their Yuletide experience, he -like many of the Journalists that write the shite that he sort-of-says, just had
a Christmas like the others before.

The problem when doing one of these half-hearted Chy-na impersonations is that the ones you're oppressing
need to be generations of new and non-war-aware people who think real life is like YouTube and not like reality. (1)

Too many old ones never fell to the virus and they managed to tell the young 'uns that politicians will give you
half what you want, but take everything in the end. BoJo never counted on the immune-system fighting back as hard as it did.

The British public don't just believe in him anymore, they're bored with his rulings and it could well threaten his
Conservatory Party's future. Then it's not giggles and newspaper propaganda, it's a voter with a memory.
He was elected for his willingness to get Brexit done and the people who chose him knew they were getting
a clown. Now that clown is overstaying his welcome and not because of his behind-the-scenes-parties and
Police assistance, but due to his poor attempts to tell the UK public that the Mandela Flu is lethal.

But it's the same as the US, the old two-party situation. On one hand you have the Tories, a group that have
traditionally adhered to the old-boys network and frown at the working-classes. Then there is the Labour Party
who -as long as you have blue-hair and will constantly steer a conversation towards genitals (2), now are also a
laughing-stock and frown when the working-classes ask to be represented.

London Upper-Middle-Class and London Middle-Class... that's why the media Coof narrative is always about closing
theatres and restaurants. Do you think the working-class look on these as luxuries or things you go to weekly?(3) 
tinywondering
(Stifling rant!)

1. Agreed. I would also include adherents to the "History of Now" at any age. If you have no idea of what has happened, it all seems new and scary. 

2. Same here in the states. Way too much attention paid to that small but vocal crowd and negligence to everybody else who works for a living. 

3. You bring up a great point. I can only speak for where I live in the States (rural area) but there are none of those items here. Sure, some small places to eat but there have been no-masks or any of that garbage for a year or more. When the threat is for closing down theaters in NYC or someplace, that is targeted at wealthy, urban dwellers. They also demonize the rubes in fly-over country as the cause of their missed shows and entertainment. Sure... if Joe the dairy farmer in nowhere Nebraska just got his 18th booster, then we could see musicals again on Broadway. Makes total sense.
#4
(12-22-2021, 08:09 PM)BIAD Wrote: It's a bit of a 'sticky-wicket' for ol' Boris and his buddies. Last Christmas, they held -in-and-around that period,
eight 'get-togethers' that many would call parties. Even though he ordered businesses to close and families to
limit their Yuletide experience, he -like many of the Journalists that write the shite that he sort-of-says, just had
a Christmas like the others before.

The problem when doing one of these half-hearted Chy-na impersonations is that the ones you're oppressing
need to be generations of new and non-war-aware people who think real life is like YouTube and not like reality.
Too many old ones never fell to the virus and they managed to tell the young 'uns that politicians will give you
half what you want, but take everything in the end.
BoJo never counted on the immune-system fighting back as hard as it did.

The British public don't just believe in him anymore, they're bored with his rulings and it could well threaten his
Conservatory Party's future. Then it's not giggles and newspaper propaganda, it's a voter with a memory.
He was elected for his willingness to get Brexit done and the people who chose him knew they were getting
a clown. Now that clown is overstaying his welcome and not because of his behind-the-scenes-parties and
Police assistance, but due to his poor attempts to tell the UK public that the Mandela Flu is lethal.

But it's the same as the US, the old two-party situation. On one hand you have the Tories, a group that have
traditionally adhered to the old-boys network and frown at the working-classes. Then there is the Labour Party
who -as long as you have blue-hair and will constantly steer a conversation towards genitals, now are also a
laughing-stock and frown when the working-classes ask to be represented.

London Upper-Middle-Class and London Middle-Class... that's why the media Coof narrative is always about closing
theatres and restaurants. Do you think the working-class look on these as luxuries or things you go to weekly? 
tinywondering
(Stifling rant!)

I only have one real, pressing, burning question: who does Boris' hair?

The political situation IS much the same in the US. We have the Republicans, who started their lives as Left-wing self-declared "Radicals", and Democrats who at that time were "Conservatives". Something happened after the Civil War, and after reconstruction, that caused them to flip places. Republicans took over the South, previously a Democrat stronghold, in a forced hostile takeover, but over time they became the Conservatives from rubbing the wrong elbows, I reckon. Then the Democrats became the "Liberals" in an effort to regain currency by "standing up for minorities" and "standing up for the Working Man" by supporting Unions, which themselves were Marxist in nature... so the Democrats became Marxist-lite, in opposition to the Republicans who were becoming the Conservatives.

Even as recently as the 1970's and early 1980's, the Democrats claimed they were "the party of the Working Man", and you still hear some claim that... weakly.

But if you look more closely, all of the Democrat support is coming not from the working people, but from Wall Street and limousine Liberals - hardly what one would call "the working man". The only people still claiming the Democrats are "for the Working Man" are die-hards who don't bother to examine the party too deeply, and dyed in the wool Marxists, who love the support for Labor Unions (which is decidedly AGAINST the Working Man in America), and who love the Socialist support for sliding the nation off a cliff.

The most recent Democrat attempt at Fun With Numbers, flinging the borders wide open to net more illegal Hispanics on the notion that Hispanics vote Democrat, has backfired on them and has them running for cover. As it turns out, Hispanics come to America to get AWAY from exactly the kind of nation the Socialists are trying to create here, and the Hispanics are having none of that. They could have stayed home if they had wanted to be poor and downtrodden, so they are increasingly turning their backs on Democrats in favor of someone who will create the environment of success they came here for. They are smart enough not to want to create the same damned thing at their destination that they were running away from.

Democrats did not count on importing smart Illegals - they thought they were getting subservient herd beasts.

.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


#5
(12-23-2021, 11:02 PM)Ninurta Wrote: I only have one real, pressing, burning question: who does Boris' hair?

The political situation IS much the same in the US. We have the Republicans, who started their lives as Left-wing self-declared "Radicals", and Democrats who at that time were "Conservatives". Something happened after the Civil War, and after reconstruction, that caused them to flip places. Republicans took over the South, previously a Democrat stronghold, in a forced hostile takeover, but over time they became the Conservatives from rubbing the wrong elbows, I reckon. Then the Democrats became the "Liberals" in an effort to regain currency by "standing up for minorities" and "standing up for the Working Man" by supporting Unions, which themselves were Marxist in nature... so the Democrats became Marxist-lite, in opposition to the Republicans who were becoming the Conservatives.

Even as recently as the 1970's and early 1980's, the Democrats claimed they were "the party of the Working Man", and you still hear some claim that... weakly.

But if you look more closely, all of the Democrat support is coming not from the working people, but from Wall Street and limousine Liberals - hardly what one would call "the working man". The only people still claiming the Democrats are "for the Working Man" are die-hards who don't bother to examine the party too deeply, and dyed in the wool Marxists, who love the support for Labor Unions (which is decidedly AGAINST the Working Man in America), and who love the Socialist support for sliding the nation off a cliff.

The most recent Democrat attempt at Fun With Numbers, flinging the borders wide open to net more illegal Hispanics on the notion that Hispanics vote Democrat, has backfired on them and has them running for cover. As it turns out, Hispanics come to America to get AWAY from exactly the kind of nation the Socialists are trying to create here, and the Hispanics are having none of that. They could have stayed home if they had wanted to be poor and downtrodden, so they are increasingly turning their backs on Democrats in favor of someone who will create the environment of success they came here for. They are smart enough not to want to create the same damned thing at their destination that they were running away from.

Democrats did not count on importing smart Illegals - they thought they were getting subservient herd beasts.

Boris' hair is a creature all of his own, I think it lives in a drawer beside his bed at number 10 Downing Street
and wakes at dawn, then creeps to his snoring head and hooks into his scalp. The dishevelled blonde mop then
downloads its terrible Journalistic ideology into his purposeless brain and spends the day enjoying the negative
reactions from its shallow piss-taking.

In the UK -and I'm being general in my opinion, during my time of growing up from the sixties and being from a part
of Britain that isn't near London, I saw that the Conservatives (Tories) were perceived as the political party that tended
to serve those of 'good-breeding' and the wealthy.

In the UK, having a lot of money does not equate to wealth in the Old World manner, this is important.

The Labour Party was seen as the 'working-man's' choice and its socialistic-bent leaned more to a mild nationalistic
focus based on looking-out for the majority of the population of the country during the sixties and seventies. Of course,
the Labour Party enjoyed the funding from the many Trade Unions, where as the Conservative Party sought monies from
major business owners and controllers.

However, all of this has changed. The working-class became discerned as middle-class by the Labour Party due to the
change in an assumed betterment of British society in general. Newer generations were not aware of what had been
before and accepted the proletariat, the average person-in-the-street, was a 9-to-5 office worker and focused more on
materialism to bring enjoyment to one's life.

The actual blue-collar, unskilled regional-accented person was slowly strained from the group and this left a gap for those
from the middle-class with small, useless agendas to decorate and inevitably weaken a once serious political force.
Occasionally, a person fom the middle or northern areas of England are paraded to the media for public-relation purposes,
but it's merely bunting to indicate some idea that the Labour Party still has grass-roots.

The Conservatives have always enjoyed the trappings of the 'country-club set' and even now, as the Christmas party revelations
appear on the front pages of the MSM, it's only another display of what is a standard dogma for the Tories. They are better than
those who go along with their rulings, not because they believe they are better and have a dislike for those on a lower rung of
the social order -but because they see themselves as more superior due to their own higher social-status.

This ties-in with Ninurta's final comment: 'Democrats did not count on importing smart Illegals - they thought they were getting
subservient herd beasts' because in a way, humans seek a better and easier way of living. When obtained through means of
struggle, one is very reluctant to relinquish such an acquired goal and therefore, resist those who used the same mode that
was used to obtain it. 'Illegal immigrants' become 'Americans' because they see this as a higher rung on their ladder of life
and then the same factors of 'home-grown' patriots come into play to protect that achievement.

Importing allies doesn't work, you have to cultivate them from within one's own belief-structure. At this point, most people
avoid words that skirt around the idea of a cult, but all social animals can be said to belong to such a style of collectivism.
Sadly, the literal meaning of both 'cult' and 'collectivism' have been hijacked to point to a particular way of thinking.
Wolves and sheep are both herd or pack societies, but we don't hang badges on them that hint at 'Maoism, Leninism' or
'communism'!

Anyway, the design for in-house social and political accord must be comprehensive because it must make sure no isolation
takes place that could nurture a negative force based on its forced-division. Keeping people apart is a temporary win, but in
a system patterned around a public voting for those who create the rules, the individuals who are negatively effected by poor
rule-making becomes part of a group and those groups can become a majority.
And regardless what the established media attempt, they become a majority with a memory.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)