Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
VINCE FOSTER FILES VANISH FROM NATIONAL ARCHIVES...
#1
Anyone here Shocked By This?
I don't think so, most believe the Clinton Thugs Killed Poor Vince Foster.
Now with her election close and all these other Whistleblowers Coming Up Dead, Well someone is protecting her from investigative reporters doing their job for the public.
Like This Guy:
Quote:Ronald Kessler, a former Washington Post and Wall Street Journal investigative reporter, is the New York Times bestselling author of The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents and The Secrets of the FBI.
What did he discover?
Quote:FBI agents' reports of interviews documenting that Hillary Clinton's stinging humiliation of her friend and mentor Vince Foster in front of White House aides triggered his suicide a week later are missing from where they should be filed at the National Archives, Daily Mail Online has learned exclusively.
On two separate occasions, this author visited the National Archives and Records Service in College Park, Md., to review the reports generated by FBI agents assigned to investigate the 1993 death of Bill Clinton's deputy White House counsel.

On the first visit, archivist David Paynter provided the box of records that he said contained the FBI reports of interviews conducted by FBI agents on Foster's death. 

On a second visit, archivist James Mathis provided what he said were those same documents.

While the box contained dozens of FBI reports concerning Foster's death - including interviews with the medical examiner, U.S. Park Police officers, and White House aides about the contents of Foster's office -  the reports on Hillary Clinton's role in his death were absent.
[Image: 377E036D00000578-3753013-image-a-57_1471884037267.jpg] Source
That's right, Missing! tinywhat
Surprised? tinysure
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#2
Quote:During the White House meeting, Hillary continued to humiliate Foster mercilessly, according to both former FBI agents, who spoke about the investigation for the first time.

'Hillary put him down really, really bad in a pretty good-size meeting,' Copeland says. 'She told him he didn't get the picture, and he would always be a little hick town lawyer who was obviously not ready for the big time.'

Indeed, Hillary went so far as to blame Foster for all the Clintons' problems and to accuse him of failing them, according to Clemente, who was also assigned by the FBI to the Starr investigation and who probed the circumstances surrounding Foster's suicide.

'Foster was profoundly depressed, but Hillary lambasting him was the final straw because she publicly embarrassed him in front of others,' says Clemente.

'Hillary blamed him for failed nominations, claimed he had not vetted them properly, and said in front of his White House colleagues, 'You're not protecting us' and 'You have failed us,' Clemente says. 'That was the final blow.'
After the White House meeting, Foster's behavior changed dramatically, the FBI agents found. Those who knew him said his voice sounded strained, he became withdrawn and preoccupied, and his sense of humor vanished. At times, Foster teared up. He talked of feeling trapped.


We had always heard way back when Bill was still Governor, how much of a bitch Hillary could be.

So this here, the claims of her riding Foster's azz, placing blame on him for everything, does not really surprise me.
Just goes to show what a cold hearted bitch Hillary is and how driven she is when it comes to power.

What her voters do not understand is Hillary is only out for herself. Period.
The power, the Leadership. She would be Top Dawg if wins Presidency.

She will play to the various groups out there in order to get elected. That is her ultimate dream, has been since their Arkansas days.
Those people called it way back when, damned if they weren't right.

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

Reply
#3
Quote:This is not the first time documents related to the Clintons have apparently vanished from the National Archive.

In March 2009, the archives found that an external hard drive from the Bill Clinton White House containing confidential documents was missing. 

When it could not be located, the inspector general's office announced that it had opened a criminal investigation.
Offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to recovery of the hard drive, the archives asked that tips be reported to the Secret Service.

At the time, the archives said it had a backup drive.



Oh come one, really???
Does anyone else besides me find this a tad bit odd?

How convenient for shit related to the Clinton's "mysteriously" disappear from the National Archives.


They claimed they had a back-up, but still makes one wonder.

a.k.a. 'snarky412'
 
        

Reply
#4
Files of the Clintons Disappearing is nothing knew as long as the Clintons are still in Washington.

Remember Sandy Berger?
Yes a Clinton Aide, he was the National Security Adviser to Slick Willie if memory serves me correctly.
Give me a second, Google is our friend.

Quote:Former Clinton Aide Pleads Guilty to Taking Classified Docs

WASHINGTON –  For months, he called it an honest mistake.

But on Friday, Sandy Berger (search) pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in federal court. Berger, who served as President Clinton's national security adviser, is acknowledging that it wasn't an honest mistake and that he intentionally took and destroyed copies of classified documents from the National Archives (search) and cut them up with scissors.
Berger acknowledged to U.S. Magistrate Deborah Robinson that he intentionally took and deliberately destroyed three copies of the same document dealing with terror threats during the 2000 millennium (search) celebration. He then lied about it to Archives staff when they told him the documents were missing.
"Guilty, your honor," Berger responded when asked how he pleaded.
Robinson did not ask Berger why he cut up the materials and threw them away at the Washington office of his Stonebridge International consulting firm. Berger, accompanied by his wife, Susan, did not offer an explanation when he addressed reporters outside the federal courthouse following the hearing.
 Source
That's right, having others do their dirty work for them, Destroy evidence of their Crimes and or Failures, much like Bill Clinton's Failure to Kill or Stop Bin Laden when he had the chance before 9/11, So Bush's administration would get all the Blame.
Quote:It was May 30, 2002, eight months after the terrorist attacks, and Berger walked unnoticed into a separate entrance on Pennsylvania Avenue that was used by the archives staff, who had continued to work in the building during the renovations. Berger had special permission to visit the archives that day, although he was hardly pleased to be there. The archives employees who encountered Berger that morning would remember that he made little effort to hide his annoyance with the assignment he had been given there by his old friend and boss Bill Clinton.

Samuel R. Berger, “Sandy” to almost everyone, had a right to be annoyed. It was the Thursday after Memorial Day, and Washington seemed finally to be catching its breath in the aftermath of 9/11. Finally it was almost summer again. Many in official Washington, especially those who had any role in responding to 9/11, could actually think about leaving the city for a few days’ rest. But here was Berger, preparing to spend the entire day inside the vaultlike archives. Thousands of documents? Tens of thousands? Berger had no way of knowing. What he knew was that this was the first of what might be several days of poring over bankers boxes stuffed with secret documents about the Clinton administration’s struggles against al-Qaeda. Specifically, about Berger’s performance as Clinton’s national security adviser in dealing with the threat from Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network.
This article if you read the whole thing is Very Soft On Bill Clinton.
Quote:From his new home in New York, Clinton had named Berger as his representative from the NSC in dealing with the special congressional committee that had been set up in early 2002 to investigate intelligence failures before September 11.
Berger assumed he would later fill the same liaison role for Clinton if the 9/11 families overcame fierce opposition from the Bush White House and managed to pressure Congress to establish an independent commission to investigate the attacks. Before Berger talked with any outside investigators, he needed to remind himself what was in his files and in the files of the rest of his NSC staff.

Berger thought it was just so typical that he would be left with the assignment. He brought it on himself, he knew. “Just leave it to Sandy” had been a mantra in the Clinton White House, and Berger had never protested enough when he heard it.

Since 9/11, he had been forced to become the Clinton administration’s de facto spokesman again, responding to all of the reporters who wanted to know whether Clinton and his White House team felt they bore any responsibility for the attacks, whether Clinton had done everything he could during his eight years in office to kill bin Laden. Many of Ber-ger’s former colleagues in the administration had ducked the reporters’ calls — “Everyone else stepped back from the questions,” he said — but not Berger. He guessed he had spent hundreds of hours answering reporters’ calls since 9/11; that work was all unpaid, of course.
But if annoyance was his first reaction to the assignment in the archives, his second was fear. And that, too, was typical of Sandy Berger. Beneath his gruff amiability, there was deep insecurity that, even he admitted, bordered on paranoia.

Was there something in the White House documents that might embarrass Berger? Was there some e-mail that would give his enemies a chance to argue that Berger and his NSC staff had left the nation vulnerable to attack by al-Qaeda? If he found embarrassing documents in the files, what would he do?
Was this the day he first considered smuggling classified documents out of the archives — in his pockets, in his socks — to try to protect himself?
Source
No he was trying to protect Bill Clinton!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#5







Their Murder Machine killed him.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#6
Clinton Crime Inc.
[Image: crime-family.gif?w=326][Image: ATT00014.jpg]
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#7
Some of our younger readers that don't know or remember the Clintons from the 90's might need to watch this.



Quote:The ghost of Vince Foster is back. Again.

This time the Clinton White House attorney who committed suicide in 1993 is being conjured in support of two new conspiracy theories: Google is protecting Hillary Clinton by suppressing negative news stories, and the National Archives is working toward the same goal by hiding incriminating records.

"Google is being accused of hiding negative stories about Hillary and her campaign by changing its algorithm to bury stories like the 'Clinton body count' story," Casone told viewers. "That's according to website Infowars. If a Google user types in 'Clinton body,' they get car repair shop results instead of a story that talks about a list of people tied to the Clintons who have died under mysterious circumstances over the last three decades."
Source
The video attached to the above article is very good.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#8
Turn that TV off.



[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#9
(06-09-2018, 04:56 PM)BIAD Wrote: Turn that TV off.




Ugh!  FAKE NEWS! FAKE NEWS!  FAKE NEWS ALL OVER THE PLACE!   minusculeheadbanging  
It makes me mad!   tinyshouting And the Clintons got away with it again.  Sigh...




Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)