Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Zimbabwe wants its white farmers back
#1
First they killed and forced the white farmers to leave the country, then they destroyed the country because they did not have the IQ to do the job. Now they want the white people back to help save and rebuild the country. BLM is not going to like this

Quote:Published 15 September 2020 at 14.12

FOREIGN. 20 years ago, Zimbabwe confiscated white farmers' property and gave it to blacks. But now the African country wants the white men back, reports IOL News.
Like the article on Facebook





In 2017, Reuters published a video showing how Rob Smart was finally able to return to his farm in Zimbabwe after previously being forced to leave the property under gun threat.
The Africans on the farm were so happy to see him again that they screamed and cried and gathered around Smart to hug him, and then burst into a spontaneous dance of joy.
A similar treatment was given to De Waal Viljoen, who had his tobacco plantation forcibly confiscated by the government in 2001, reports IOL News. When he recently visited the plantation, he found his former employees living in poverty under "deplorable circumstances."
He is now considering returning to the farm, which his family has owned for generations, 20 years later, to help the Africans there. And that's something that could happen - the new government under President Emmerson Mnangagwa recently approved a proposal to compensate white farmers if they return to their previously forcibly confiscated property.
For most of the 20th century, Zimbabwe was known as "Africa's granary". Large quantities of wheat, maize and tobacco were exported from the country's fertile plains to the rest of Africa.
But it was above all the country's white farmers who were responsible for the country's flourishing agricultural industry and well into the 90s, 70 percent of the country's arable land was still owned by whites. That was something that President Mugabe and the ruling Zanu party wanted to change.
In 2000, the government launched the agricultural reform, in which white farmers were forced to give up their land while being urged to leave the country.
But the consequences for Zimbabwe's agricultural industry were catastrophic. A large part of the country's fertile agricultural land went to people who were loyal to Mugabe and had no interest at all in growing crops. Other land went to black Zimbabweans who did not know how to use the land efficiently.
Under Robert Mugabe's rule, unemployment rose to an incredible 95 percent
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH, THE EU IS FATHER AND MOTHER
Reply
#2
(09-15-2020, 07:45 PM)Wallfire Wrote: First they killed and forced the white farmers to leave the country, then they destroyed the country because they did not have the IQ to do the job. Now they want the white people back to help save and rebuild the country. BLM is not going to like this

The moral to that story is (come on and say it with me):

Be careful what you wish for because sometimes you actually get it! 
"As an American it's your responsibility to have your own strategic duck stockpile. You can't expect the government to do it for you." - the dork I call one of my mom's other kids
Reply
#3
Yeah...it wasn't a brilliant strategy. 

In this case the white farmers (and other white business owners) were made out to be the boogie men in order for Mugabe Inc. to further their power/wealth. Always need a villain right? 

It was a poor choice of villains. The agricultural land was given to non-farmers as you mentioned. Is it a mystery what happened next? 

Now? Maybe they realize keeping around the people who know how to run things may not be such a bad idea. You can always work out the the perceived equality thing but you need to eat while doing it.
Reply
#4
As a white, how should I feel ? I'll let you ponder and then answer that question in your own good time.
Reply
#5
White flight destroyed Detroit. Whites left and the blacks took over political offices, businesses and the neighborhoods. The black Democrats got power and quickly became corrupt. The black communities became run down and then destroyed eventually causing the blacks to move into the white suburbs destroying them too.

Gentrifacation, gambling and an influx of middle eastern immigration revitalized much of downtown and the inner city after it nearly collapsed under the black occupation. But the blacks are still expanding out into the white neighborhoods and for some reason crime goes up and property value goes down, forcing the whites to move further from the core of the city.

I know this sounds racist, but I lived there for 30 years and watched it happen. It didn't have to be the blacks, but it wasn't the Irish, Polish, Italian, etc., those old neighborhoods got sacked first. The blacks were doing pretty good up until the 1960 riots with the auto industry, Motown music, and a hip community. But after the destruction of the riots, they never fixed anything, it all sat there and rotted and continued to burn esp. every "Devil's Night" before Halloween.
Reply
#6
Ummmmmmmm.....errrrrrr....uhhhhh....whatever.
internet Agent Provocateur
Reply
#7
South Africa is killing white farmers and families. Many many articles about what has been going on there. The good news is when they learn just how stupid their tribal socialist ideas are it will be to late so they will go back to being stupid and starving.. minusculebeercheers
Reply
#8
(09-16-2020, 03:22 AM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: White flight destroyed Detroit. Whites left and the blacks took over political offices, businesses and the neighborhoods. The black Democrats got power and quickly became corrupt.  The black communities became run down and then destroyed eventually causing the blacks to move into the white suburbs destroying them too.

Gentrifacation, gambling and an influx of middle eastern immigration revitalized much of downtown and the inner city after it nearly collapsed under the black occupation. But the blacks are still expanding out into the white neighborhoods and for some reason crime goes up and property value goes down, forcing the whites to move further from the core of the city.

I know this sounds racist, but I lived there for 30 years and watched it happen. It didn't have to be the blacks, but it wasn't the Irish, Polish, Italian, etc., those old neighborhoods got sacked first. The blacks were doing pretty good up until the 1960 riots with the auto industry, Motown music, and a hip community. But after the destruction of the riots, they never fixed anything, it all sat there and rotted and continued to burn esp. every "Devil's Night" before Halloween.

I have to clarify this. Once the black community gained political power, corruption took over. I'm not saying the whites who once had a majority weren't corrupt, but they maintained a status quo with a higher standard of living. The whites left in droves after the 1960s riots, leaving the black community to their own devices. Maybe things were too far gone to bring the city back, but the black Democratic mayors were all corrupt. For example, Coleman Young, when he left office, with all his amassed wealth from his terms in office, still went and took everything out of the mayor's Manoogian Mansion including all the light bulbs and fuses from the fuse boxes. I'm actually surprised he didn't strip all the wiring and scrap metal too, as is common practice in Detroit when a building becomes unoccupied.

You could see the cultural change when Detroit went from Motown to Rap music when the cop hating gansta crap becoming popular. This was a little over ten years after the riots when rap came around. Punk might be considered the white cultural response at the time, a whole other discussion.

I can see how this relates to what is happening in Africa, I hope others can too. There is a black uprising, the whites leave, then corruption makes a mess of things. The only difference is the black community in Detroit doesn't want whites back while they continue to move out of their neighborhoods after they are too far gone to live in anymore.
Reply
#9
The modern society needs a high level of IQ to be able to function in it.  People from Africa and the ME countries as a rule do not have the level to function in the modern society. This has been seen when it was necessary to lower teaching standards and employ people who are not up to doing the job. In the modern tec world a high level of IQ is needed if one wants to work and rise in the system
So if you cant rise in the system you import the system from the country you came from, and thats why violence, rape killing is the norm with  in there system. Violence and killing does not need a very high IQ and is the only way they can rise in there systems.
End result will be if not stopped, the higher IQ people living in gated citys and town, the rest left to roam wild.
What a shit world it could become
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH, THE EU IS FATHER AND MOTHER
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)