Random thoughts

[Antar]

Ok just some random thoughts on masks and general population home detentions. 

It occurred to me that had Hillary won the elections, and had her coziness with the Muslum Brotherhood and Islamic traditions, CPC, been the life we live without restraint, without exception, would we have been made to wear burkas so as not to offend Islam? 

Are masks just a sample of that possibility in a Democratic Socialist future for America? Are masks a control feature that attempts to emasculate men and cover those offensive mouths that speak dirty words, not in alignment with others traditions?  Is it offensive to other traditions to see women walk down the streets with full face openness like a naked lady at Monks retreat? 

After reading about the Democrats Ideas for America in a post-Trump Presidency, the home lockdowns also begin to make me wonder if the New Ab-Normal and in home imprisonment live training exercises are going to be the playbook for forcing civilians into their homes without question or debate, while the Future Infrastructure is created and put into place?  

These tactics by over-controlling Communist minded rulers are not anything new or normal. It takes time and the timelines seem to be colliding for the America we have always known.  I was searching for some validation on my thoughts and how common civilian lockdowns are and found and interesting article you may want to skim. 

https://www.citymetric.com/horizons/urba...sible-4959

Well, that is it for now and I thank you for taking time to read my random thoughts...

[Antar]

Ok just some random thoughts on masks and general population home detentions. 

It occurred to me that had Hillary won the elections, and had her coziness with the Muslum Brotherhood and Islamic traditions, CPC, been the life we live without restraint, without exception, would we have been made to wear burkas so as not to offend Islam? 

Are masks just a sample of that possibility in a Democratic Socialist future for America? Are masks a control feature that attempts to emasculate men and cover those offensive mouths that speak dirty words, not in alignment with others traditions?  Is it offensive to other traditions to see women walk down the streets with full face openness like a naked lady at Monks retreat? 

After reading about the Democrats Ideas for America in a post-Trump Presidency, the home lockdowns also begin to make me wonder if the New Ab-Normal and in home imprisonment live training exercises are going to be the playbook for forcing civilians into their homes without question or debate, while the Future Infrastructure is created and put into place?  

These tactics by over-controlling Communist minded rulers are not anything new or normal. It takes time and the timelines seem to be colliding for the America we have always known.  I was searching for some validation on my thoughts and how common civilian lockdowns are and found and interesting article you may want to skim. 

https://www.citymetric.com/horizons/urba...sible-4959

Well, that is it for now and I thank you for taking time to read my random thoughts... unless you add in facial reccognition and tracing...

[guohua]

@"Antar" 

Good post.
The American People just dodged a Knife to their Throat.

[Antar]

@"Antar" 

Good post.
The American People just dodged a Knife to their Throat.

I think we all know that the only thing we gained was a little more time to prepare for what seems to be inevitable.  TY for your reply to my first attempt to contribute, it has been a long while and I am rusty... Antar the rusty...

[Sol]

Ok just some random thoughts on masks and general population home detentions. 

It occurred to me that had Hillary won the elections, and had her coziness with the Muslum Brotherhood and Islamic traditions, CPC, been the life we live without restraint, without exception, would we have been made to wear burkas so as not to offend Islam? 

Are masks just a sample of that possibility in a Democratic Socialist future for America? Are masks a control feature that attempts to emasculate men and cover those offensive mouths that speak dirty words, not in alignment with others traditions?  Is it offensive to other traditions to see women walk down the streets with full face openness like a naked lady at Monks retreat? 

After reading about the Democrats Ideas for America in a post-Trump Presidency, the home lockdowns also begin to make me wonder if the New Ab-Normal and in home imprisonment live training exercises are going to be the playbook for forcing civilians into their homes without question or debate, while the Future Infrastructure is created and put into place?  

These tactics by over-controlling Communist minded rulers are not anything new or normal. It takes time and the timelines seem to be colliding for the America we have always known.  I was searching for some validation on my thoughts and how common civilian lockdowns are and found and interesting article you may want to skim. 

https://www.citymetric.com/horizons/urba...sible-4959

Well, that is it for now and I thank you for taking time to read my random thoughts...

From your article:

Since the late 1990s, it has become more common for two or three residents’ committees to be amalgamated into a larger community, known as a shequ. These can comprise as many as 16,000 people from diverse social backgrounds and include organisations such as companies and schools from the local area. Within the shequ, a neighbourhood delegate assembly elects the members of the residents’ committees, who are often women. The CCP retains control by having party secretaries elected or appointed. Local urban governance is, at least in part, the responsibility of people in the communities themselves.

Full government control could very well be what's at play here.

At first, it was Stay Home, Stay Safe as we're shutting everything down. And so we did. Not by choice, not by voting for it, not by referendum, no. We just stopped the economy for months. And none of us said a thing.

Once that irreparable damage was done (a lot of Dad and Mom's little business won't survive this but the Big Guns stay), they've put rules in place that will get you either fined or arrested or both if you don't comply. No more than 2 people together, no more than one passenger in the car, in the back seat, from a same address only. No in home gathering. No exterior family member allowed. And none of us said a thing.

They've relieved some of those constraints only to put some more. And most of the people are still, to this day, following the rules. To a T.

They've tested the waters for global compliance. And it worked. And none of us said a thing. So what keeps them from totally owning your life, now?

This is right out of a 1984 playbook.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Antar! Keeps my suspicious mind busy..

[Antar]

Ok just some random thoughts on masks and general population home detentions. 

It occurred to me that had Hillary won the elections, and had her coziness with the Muslum Brotherhood and Islamic traditions, CPC, been the life we live without restraint, without exception, would we have been made to wear burkas so as not to offend Islam? 

Are masks just a sample of that possibility in a Democratic Socialist future for America? Are masks a control feature that attempts to emasculate men and cover those offensive mouths that speak dirty words, not in alignment with others traditions?  Is it offensive to other traditions to see women walk down the streets with full face openness like a naked lady at Monks retreat? 

After reading about the Democrats Ideas for America in a post-Trump Presidency, the home lockdowns also begin to make me wonder if the New Ab-Normal and in home imprisonment live training exercises are going to be the playbook for forcing civilians into their homes without question or debate, while the Future Infrastructure is created and put into place?  

These tactics by over-controlling Communist minded rulers are not anything new or normal. It takes time and the timelines seem to be colliding for the America we have always known.  I was searching for some validation on my thoughts and how common civilian lockdowns are and found and interesting article you may want to skim. 

https://www.citymetric.com/horizons/urba...sible-4959

Well, that is it for now and I thank you for taking time to read my random thoughts...

From your article:

Since the late 1990s, it has become more common for two or three residents’ committees to be amalgamated into a larger community, known as a shequ. These can comprise as many as 16,000 people from diverse social backgrounds and include organisations such as companies and schools from the local area. Within the shequ, a neighbourhood delegate assembly elects the members of the residents’ committees, who are often women. The CCP retains control by having party secretaries elected or appointed. Local urban governance is, at least in part, the responsibility of people in the communities themselves.

Full government control could very well be what's at play here.

At first, it was Stay Home, Stay Safe as we're shutting everything down. And so we did. Not by choice, not by voting for it, not by referendum, no. We just stopped the economy for months. And none of us said a thing.

Once that irreparable damage was done (a lot of Dad and Mom's little business won't survive this but the Big Guns stay), they've put rules in place that will get you either fined or arrested or both if you don't comply. No more than 2 people together, no more than one passenger in the car, in the back seat, from a same address only. No in home gathering. No exterior family member allowed. And none of us said a thing.

They've relieved some of those constraints only to put some more. And most of the people are still, to this day, following the rules. To a T.

They've tested the waters for global compliance. And it worked. And none of us said a thing. So what keeps them from totally owning your life, now?

This is right out of a 1984 playbook.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Antar! Keeps my suspicious mind busy..  

Yes reading that made me think to substitute women with black, brown, native american, pacific islander, and to exclude ppl of no color or gender differences for what we are now watching. Remember the olden days when all the ferocious armchair warriors abounded online? The ones who claimed at a moments notice they were ready and even armed to go fight for the American way of life? Hummm, your post is so honest and raw it almost hurt to read.