Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Seven Hermetic Principles Explained
#1
RedPill78 dropped off some interesting links during his show last night, or it might have been on the Beyond the Headlines show, I forget. I watched both back to back.
Well, actually, it was a caller who gave this information while on air and I wrote it down. (I also have a book link that I might share in a different thread.)
The caller said these principles changed his life. He went from being a drug addict to a successful life today.

I haven't had time to read the entire article, but I did scan over it; looks interesting.

Read over them and let's discuss them, if you have any opinions to share.


[Image: f51adb9c9f8fe4baa0cd08e982cfe018.jpg]


There are some universal laws that can be found across space and time – they’re a part of how the Universe works. The 7 hermetic principles are an example of this conduct and this article explains all of them.

Quote:“The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of understanding”

The Kybalion is a book published by someone(s) under the pseudonym “the Three Initiates.” It’s based on the teachings of a revered sage of the past – Hermes Trismegistus. The name translates to “thrice greatest;” referring to his mastery over the 3 planes of existence, as explained in hermetic philosophy – the physical, mental and spiritual. In Egypt he went under the name of Thoth and in Greece was known as Hermes.

Each chapter in The Kybalion is devoted to each of its seven principles or axioms that are considered universal laws. This school of thinking goes back thousands of years to the past. Let’s be honest, people were different and culture has changed but the world in its core has still stayed mostly the same.


Quote:There are 7 principles in total, which are all interconnected with each other.

  1. The Principle of Mentalism
  2. The Principle of Correspondence
  3. The Principle of Vibration
  4. The Principle of Polarity
  5. The Principle of Rhythm
  6. The Principle of Causality
  7. The Principle of Gender

If this topic interests you, you can go through each one in detail here:  The 7 Hermetic Principles
Reply
#2
Up for discussion:

Quote:#7
The Principle of Gender

Quote:Gender is in everything; Everything has its masculine and feminine principles;…

…Gender manifests on all planes.” 

Gender is manifested in everything. There are polar opposites – the yin and yang. Every person has a biological sex with a male of female physical body. However, psychologically, both qualities exist simultaneously in everyone. The same principle can be found in other things as well – even the brain has a left and right hemisphere that corresponds with respectful gender traits.

Gender is manifested as masculine and feminine principles alike across all planes.
  • The Masculine principle is in the direction of giving out and expanding. Masculinity embodies yang energy – the Sun and its flames that scorches the Earth but at the same time gives life to it. It’s the Will – the desire to achieve something and to take the necessary action.
  • The Feminine principle is directed towards receiving and absorbing. Femininity embodies yin energy – the Moon and the flow of water that restores and sooths the burning warrior. This is the trait of creativity, spontaneity, feeling and imagination.

“It is said that there must be a balance in these two forces. Without the Feminine, the Masculine is apt to act without restraint, order, or reason, resulting in chaos. The Feminine alone, on the other hand, is apt to constantly reflect and fail to actually do anything, resulting in stagnation. With both the Masculine and Feminine working in conjunction, there is thoughtful action that breeds success, which points out that both the Feminine and the Masculine fulfill each other” – (The Kybalion 203-204)
(Highlights/Bold by me)

I think we can all agree that we are in a spiritual war right now between we humans and The Powers That Be.  I'm also sure they know about the Hermetic Principles.  Could they be trying to separate the feminine and masculine in each of us by forcing their 'no gender' bull crap on us?
They don't want a race of "successful sheep" who doesn't need them, and with so many of us waking up now I'm sure they need to do something to stifle our progress.

I fear for the next generation who are buying into this crap of "no gender" nonsense.

It's also why they want to break families apart and have single parent homes. Children grow up without having the balance of male/female energy to help guide them toward a successful life/future.
Reply
#3
Synchronicity strikes again!!   tinybighuh 

I just now went over to watch the weekly show on EdgeofWonder.tv where I have a subscription to see videos that they can't play on regular You Tube.
Guess what the subject material was?  It's all about Hermeticism.  tinysurprised

The origins of the snake staff that the god(s) carried, and information surrounding hermetic principles. 

If you have a subscription to this channel, go over there and watch it and you'll learn so much about this.  Rob and Ben start at the beginning and take you through all the myths.

minusculegoodjob
Reply
#4
(02-15-2020, 06:56 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Up for discussion:

I fear for the next generation who are buying into this crap of "no gender" nonsense.

It's also why they want to break families apart and have single parent homes. Children grow up without having the
balance of male/female energy to help guide them toward a successful life/future.

Since 99% of the creatures on this planet benefit from male/female procreation, questions can arise of:
Why is a 'no gender' agenda being promoted...? who gains from this?

I agree that family unity is being undermined and if those same 'Powers-That-Be' had a well-being-based outlook on the
way a society should flourish, then surely a two-parent relationship would not only assist in rearing generations of prepared
children into adulthood, the encouragement would ease assistance from said political-jurisdiction.
But they don't.

So what can be obtained from having a single-parent household of one possible income, one particular gender-based 
guidance and only one adult to protect the children during their development...?

Well first-off, financing a family becomes a problem and a reliance on a separate regime becomes standard.
Male and female parents teach their children to deal with life with a duel perspective, to trust that a woman's perception
holds values that a man's awareness may lack. And -of course, visa-versa.
Two weapons are better than one.

With the accepted 'traditional' view that males role fulfil in a family is to acquire food, utilise its mass and strength
to protect the brood and female, I would suggest the priority would be to alter the male's outlook on what a male's
personification really is.

The female tends the offspring, nurtures and promotes mental growth and is the backbone of a child's development.
Every male knows that his part in the whole action of rearing a family is orbited around the female, for she is not only
the tutor to the children, she is the producer of them.

I'd propose here that to constantly convince females that her position in a family unit far outweighs her partner's
representation and ergo, eject the male from the situation, it is an ideal way of isolating the female and weakening
any strong network between the trusted male.
Divide and conquer.

And what for...? To perform such tactics would add a burden on social management, on the financial running of a tribe,
country or planet. It would weaken human confidence in itself and lead to what the MSM like to call 'mental issues'.
But it does assist in making humans more compliant and make it easier to control the herd in general.

The dilution of standard gender roles creates chaos on many levels, it confuses and dissuades unity and single people
are easier to control than an agreeing group. One's self-preservation beliefs can be bombarded with external influence
and without trusted parents to boost confidence, values and thinking can be changed to benefit a different tribe or group.

That child becomes pliable, but the basic need to seek solace in a trusted unit is still there and this is where the external
force steps in. Rules are administered -just like a true parent would do and assignments given.

The female will be resigned to her original role of child-producer -but the whole atmosphere of being a woman will be
extolled so that she comes to believe she is still independent and strong. Whilst the male will be issued with doctrines
that ensure fear of a stronger masculine force is always their if he dares to attempt to be what nature built him to be.

The standard manner of sexual intercourse will be diminished and a sense of homogeneous interaction will be popularised
under the banner of freedom from outdated-moralistic-control. Men and women cannot create a family unit if they only lay
with those of their own sex and through popularisation of physical desire, will ensure that no possible tribe can be created
to oppose such control.

It's how you make -and keep, individuals weak.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#5
(02-16-2020, 01:29 AM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Synchronicity strikes again!!   tinybighuh 

I just now went over to watch the weekly show on EdgeofWonder.tv where I have a subscription to see videos that they can't play on regular You Tube.
Guess what the subject material was?  It's all about Hermeticism.  tinysurprised

The origins of the snake staff that the god(s) carried, and information surrounding hermetic principles. 

If you have a subscription to this channel, go over there and watch it and you'll learn so much about this.  Rob and Ben start at the beginning and take you through all the myths.

minusculegoodjob

These two guys has some GREAT Stuff on their Channel, Yes, Youtube is Censored so badly there is No Free Speech on Youtube.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#6
(02-16-2020, 10:46 AM)BIAD Wrote: It's how you make -and keep, individuals weak.

It's also how you make - and keep - individuals dependent on the government, specifically "government assistance"... and then you get a whole NEW layer of control over them! It worked so well among the African-Americans in the US starting in the 1960's that now they are desperately attempting to extend it to the entire rest of the population.


Urban blacks seem to not even realize they have merely traded one form of slavery for another. It may come with a check from the Masters, but it still keeps them down, keeps them dependent, and keeps them enslaved.

Now TPTB want to see all of us going along with that program.

.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#7
(02-18-2020, 10:08 AM)Ninurta Wrote: It's also how you make - and keep - individuals dependent on the government, specifically "government assistance"... and then you get a whole NEW layer of control over them! It worked so well among the African-Americans in the US starting in the 1960's that now they are desperately attempting to extend it to the entire rest of the population.


Urban blacks seem to not even realize they have merely traded one form of slavery for another. It may come with a check from the Masters, but it still keeps them down, keeps them dependent, and keeps them enslaved.

Now TPTB want to see all of us going along with that program.

Now there' a statement I wish people would wake up to. It's exactly correct.
minusculethumbsup
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#8
(02-18-2020, 10:45 AM)BIAD Wrote:
(02-18-2020, 10:08 AM)Ninurta Wrote: It's also how you make - and keep - individuals dependent on the government, specifically "government assistance"... and then you get a whole NEW layer of control over them! It worked so well among the African-Americans in the US starting in the 1960's that now they are desperately attempting to extend it to the entire rest of the population.


Urban blacks seem to not even realize they have merely traded one form of slavery for another. It may come with a check from the Masters, but it still keeps them down, keeps them dependent, and keeps them enslaved.

Now TPTB want to see all of us going along with that program.

Now there' a statement I wish people would wake up to. It's exactly correct.
minusculethumbsup

Along with that, going hand-in-hand, is the current drive to relocate the entire population to urban centers, and depopulate the hinterlands. The drive in in progress from the UN right on down to local governments. I've seen recent articles in the likes of National Geographic extolling the virtues of urban living, and how good it will be for the environment and how well it can combat "global climate change" - no more vehicles burning fossil fuels, for example.

It's a very tangled, interconnected web they are weaving, with connecting nodes between all of the Socialist talking points. The entire thrust of it is to gain control over the proletariat.

You see, it is far easier to control a population of sheep if they are herded into the slaughter chutes of urban areas. You then control their food, water, energy, housing, transportation, access and egress points, etc. Once you have entire control of that, in a captive population, you own them body and soul.

.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply
#9
(02-20-2020, 12:43 AM)Ninurta Wrote: ...You see, it is far easier to control a population of sheep if they are herded into the slaughter chutes of urban areas.
You then control their food, water, energy, housing, transportation, access and egress points, etc.
Once you have entire control of that, in a captive population, you own them body and soul.

Yes, it's like an interesting comment said today by a BBC News presenter -whilst discussing the new £20 polymer
note being introduced into the system. The lady said that she rarely used paper currency these days and that she
hadn't seen a twenty-pound note in a long time.

And there's the rub. We sell our labour for promissory notes that took over from the bartering system.
One particular note equals a chicken of pig to eat, another note promises two chickens, etc.

The TV presenter lives in an environment where a single piece of plastic is her money and what was once a workable
reality, is now -in her particular case, an assumed perception that she still has control over her finances.

If you're handed a chicken or a token for that bird derived from an agreed set of hours of labour, then you've physically
obtained your goal.
If you enjoy the freedom of a credit-card or bank-card, you have no chicken if the holder of your finances decides to
revoke your access to your money. It may seem wrong and against agreed rules, but it's the Governments and Banks
who make those rules, you only agree to them.

Ah yes -you may say, certain finance establishments invest your money and can give you a return, but it isn't done
solely for your benefit, they reap the rewards too... by using your promissory notes!

I'm not saying the global agreement of using currency is wrong, it's just not the original reason it was devised for.
You can't eat money... especially the new polymer ones!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#10
(02-20-2020, 10:15 AM)BIAD Wrote: And there's the rub. We sell our labour for promissory notes that took over from the bartering system.
One particular note equals a chicken of pig to eat, another note promises two chickens, etc.

....

Ah yes -you may say, certain finance establishments invest your money and can give you a return, but it isn't done
solely for your benefit, they reap the rewards too... by using your promissory notes!

I'm not saying the global agreement of using currency is wrong, it's just not the original reason it was devised for.
You can't eat money... especially the new polymer ones!

Exactly!

When you have money that doesn't really exist, that is backed up by nothing but thin air, then you can print as much of it as you need, out of nothing but paper (or polymer) and ink!

Of course everyone along the way who handles that money takes a cut of it, and the folks who print it from nothing and them lend that nothing out as if it were something rake in more of the nothing (which is assumed by mutual consent to be "something" when it really is not) when they collect on a debt... the debtor gives them much more of the nothing than he can afford to for the privelege of using their bit of "nothing" for a while.

Debt is based entirely on convincing someone that the nothing you gave them to hold in their hand is actually something, and that they need to give you something more for that bit of "nothing" you loaned them in addition to giving back the "nothing" that you lent. It is the fine art of getting people to pay you for thin air.

It seems to be a peculiar form of madness to me. That is why I stopped using any form of credit back in 1993, and have never looked back or missed it - I would be missing "nothing".

Of course, printing all of that "something" from "nothing" introduces an inflationary cycle, and then raking back in more than you laid out on debts exacerbates that inflationary cycle, and then people find that they no longer have enough to survive on, and agitate for higher wages, which pumps up the price of their products (in units of nothingness) to the point that folks can no longer survive on what they are making (because all the products have gotten more expensive due to the wage increases), and have to borrow more money and agitate for higher wages yet again... it is a self-feeding and never ending cycle of inflation, all based upon sheer nothingness.

Who wins in this inflationary  cycle of nothingness? Who is able to convert that "nothing" into "something"? Who gets the biggest pile of "something" out of it? My Dear Old Dad always told me to "follow the money" to get to the root of all evil...

... which is why I stopped dealing with banks and bankers quite some time ago. I couldn't see any percentages in giving someone else control of MY pile of "nothing".

Donald Trump recently floated the idea of getting the US back onto the Gold Standard, so that at least SOMETHING was backing up our money. The Left lost their goddamned minds when he said that! How DARE he suggest mucking up their get-rich-quick schemes of raking in piles of "nothing" that they have convinced the sheeple are actually piles of "something"?

Sometimes, perceptions are everything. If they can convince you that this pile of paper is worth "something", then it IS worth something - but only in your mind, and the minds of whomever else they can convince. In objective reality, it's still a big empty pile of nothingness. Gold is very nearly the same - it only holds value because someone, somewhere, convinced someone else that it held value. Apart from that, it's just another cold chunk of metal that has NO intrinsic value of it's own. It's just a chunk of metal, like a billet of steel. A knife blade has more value, because it is also a chunk of metal, but one with a use, a value. The only reason gold has a value is because folks have mutually agreed to value it. It's not like you can eat it, any more than you can eat polymer money.

BUT - at least with a gold standard, "money" would have to be backed by a pile of "something" to replace that massive black hole of "nothing" that is currently backing it, so in my mind it would be a step forward, however slight...


.
" I don't mind killin' a man in a fair fight... or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight... or if there's money involved... or a woman... "

 - Jayne Cobb, Hero of Canton
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)