Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Spygate Scandal
#61
It's an old tale and as you've said, the Dems are dredging up any shite to distract the public from the debate debacle.

"...Evidence connecting Ramirez and Kavanaugh

1997 wedding.
A photo obtained by NBC News shows Ramirez and Kavanaugh in a group of wedding party members in 1997.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=6371]

I've examined the photo closely and there's no evidence of penis-waggling or drunken sexual molestation!
So that calling it a connection or evidence is bunk.

"...Recent text messages. Kerry Berchem, a former Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s, told NBC that Kavanaugh
and his legal team contacted his former friends about Ramirez’s accusation before Ramirez’s story was public.
She pointed to text messages in which another friend, Karen Yarasavage, wrote of such contact.
If true, that conflicts with Kavanaugh’s testimony that he learned of Ramirez’s allegations when they became public."

If true -This article is from October 2018 and so, if such text messages exist, they would have been produced by now.
The Latin for the second 'evidence' sentence is 'innuendos-bullsh*tus'

"...People who dispute Ramirez’s account:

Male classmate 1: Ramirez gave the New Yorker the names of three men who she says were
at the party and involved in the incident. (The outlet did not publish their names.)
The first of those is a man Ramirez says was egging on Kavanaugh. That man denied any memory
of the party to the New Yorker.

Male classmate 2: A second classmate who Ramirez said was involved in the incident told the New
Yorker, “I have zero recollection [of that happening].”

Wife of male classmate 3 and other named classmates: The New Yorker story initially included a joint
statement from six Yale classmates of Kavanaugh’s: the two male classmates who are mentioned above,
the wife of the third, unnamed male classmate who Ramirez says told her to “kiss” the penis, and three
other former Yale students who knew Kavanaugh: Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy. It reads:

“We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale.
He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him,
including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place.

Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale.
We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would
have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be
completely out of character for Brett.
In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident
until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending.”..."
PBS:

Can't the Dems just come up with some decent policies instead of embarrassing themselves this way?


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#62
It's just terrible how the ethics of Journalism has been allowed to die in modern times with USA Today using a
2018 article from The Indianapolis Star to spin a particular narrative.

In the piece, a political science professor -who allegedly attended Yale University at the same time as Brett
Kavanaugh, relates his beliefs on the FBI not doing a proper investigation into the Ramirez claims.

That's fine, he's entitled to his assumptions. But it doesn't make him correct and any decent Editor would've
spiked this gossip/opinion-piece due to it's lack of evidence. But just as the New York Times can attest to,
it's all about smearing President Trump with innuendo and half-truths.

It's obvious what Clinton-loving Democrat attorney Max Stier is up to.


Quote:NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault.

'The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning
a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- hours after virtually all
2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.

The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the
supposed sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused
to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=6372]
This undated photo shows Deborah Ramirez.
Her uncorroborated allegations that Kavanaugh had exposed himself to her in college
--which came after she admitted to classmates that she was unsure Kavanaugh was
the culprit, and after she spent several days talking to a lawyer --were reported
Sept. 23, 2018, by The New Yorker magazine.

The only first-hand statement concerning the supposed attack in the original piece, which was published on
Saturday, came from a Clinton-connected lawyer [Stier] who claimed to have witnessed it.

The Times' revision says: "Editors' Note: An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book,
did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett
Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party.

The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident.
That information has been added to the article."...'
Fox News:

And so the Clown Car rumbles on.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#63
@BIAD  I hope everyone caught the part that said "came from a Clinton-connected lawyer "  tinysure
That alone should have been a Red Flag for any Intelligent Reporter,,,,, but we are talking about Liberal/progressive Ass-Holes that Hate Anything Connected to President Trump.
ANOTHER leftist conspiracy theory!
Anything else?
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#64
Some Anons have a couple of theories out there that the impeachment thing is Pres. Trump's idea; he wants to be impeached so it will open the door to allow him to do two certain things.
Sounds risky, but Q did say Trump would finish what JFK started (dismantling the CIA).

I'm interested to hear your thoughts on this, please.

This is an excellent video to listen to for all kinds of knowledge, but if you're in a hurry and just want to hear the two options from impeachment, go to the 1:55:30 mark.


Reply
#65
I Agree, I believe it is true.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#66
AG Preparing to Deliver Evidence of "DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY"?

Yes, I think he is.
I've heard many citizen journalists say their D.C. sources have told them that they already have all the information needed to make high-level arrests, but the thing holding them back is, they are waiting on the public to catch up to the truth. More people need to realize how they have been lied to before this all goes public to prevent a civil war.  If they released too much too fast, Trump's team would be accused of doing it to smear his political opponents.
Take a look at who's running for 2020 and you'll see who has their name on an arrest warrant. They know it; that's why they got in the POTUS race, for protection.

So, of course, you have the democrat media puppets going full steam ahead pushing the 'Orange Man Bad', IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH narrative.  They know they are conspirators and will be going down too if the Dems lose, which they will.






Reply
#67
On The Dilley Show this morning, Brenden put out a hypothesis that would give President Trump a way out of being involved in the take down of his political opponents and allow the arrests of the swamp creatures to go forward.

He brought up the question that, what if Rudy Guiliani, A.G. Barr, (who also had Durham with him), traveled to Italy, Australia, and the Ukraine, and suggested those countries call for the indictment of Killary, Biden, and all others involved in trying to affect the 2016 U.S. elections, and any other corruption they were involved in, and try them in court in those countries? After all, the corruption took place on their land.

Again, this would free up the U.S. Trump Administration from being directly involved with imprisoning them and causing chaos/riots in the streets here, hopefully.

Dilley said he has a high-up source, and reading between the lines, it appeared this information came from him.  I could be wrong, but that's how I took it.

As I've stated previously, the White Hats already have all the information they need to take the swamp creatures down, but they are looking for a way to do it without causing complete chaos and divide in our own country.

I think this would work.
What do you think?   minusculethinking
Reply
#68
Whoops...! The Endgame.



Quote:Treaty With Ukraine On Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=6482]


'Congressional democrats have begun inquiries into impeachment of President Trump allegedly because
Trump “tried to pressure” the Ukrainians into investigating possible corruption by former VP Joe Biden and
his son.
I have not heard reference of this treaty from the democrats or the “mainstream” press.

However, Trump was entirely within his legal purview according to a treaty signed into law during the Clinton
administration: Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.

The original treaty was signed in Kiev on July 22, 1998. Clinton transmitted the treaty to the Senate on October
19, 1999, and it was ratified by the Senate on October 18, 2000
. The following link shows Clinton’s Letter of
Transmittal, Clinton’s Letter of Submittal in which he summarizes the main points...'
Arizona Independent:

The full text of the treaty.

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
THE WHITE HOUSE, November 10, 1999.

To the Senate of the United States:
With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between the United
States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998.

I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, an exchange of notes which was signed on September 30, 1999, which provides
for its provisional application, as well as the report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaty.

The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in order to counter
criminal activities more effectively.

The Treaty should be an effective tool to assist in the prosecution of a wide variety of crimes, including drug trafficking offenses.
The Treaty is self-executing. It provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters.

Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records,
and articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other
purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restraint, confiscation, forfeiture of
assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the requested state.

I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to ratification.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON
PDF SOURCE:


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#69
Ok do I understand this right, DT tried to do what was right and stop corruption, and the Democrats want to put him in jail.
Am I missing something ??
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH, THE EU IS FATHER AND MOTHER
Reply
#70
(10-09-2019, 01:25 PM)Wallfire Wrote: Ok do I understand this right, DT tried to do what was right and stop corruption, and the Democrats want to put him in jail.
Am I missing something ??

No, you're not missing a thing.
The Demos want to put him in jail (for doing his job) because the corruption he is about to expose is theirs (the Dems).  But, I think everyone is beginning to see this now. If not, they are completely blind and brainwashed by the crooked media.

EVERYTHING the crooked media reports is a LIE!
Reply
#71
Guess who's getting thrown under the bus?  Obummer himself.   tinylaughing  

I know most of you don't think they will indict/arrest him, but if not, at least he can still be impeached and his "legacy" will go down as one of the worst Presidents of all time!  tinysure 



Quote:Rush Limbaugh played an audio of James Clapper on his Monday show.

On the tape, Clapper asked if he and other members of the Obama administration should have turned down Obama’s request to spy on the Trump campaign.

We actually knew or at least strongly suspected that Obama was behind the spying in 2018, when texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page indicated that “The White House is running this”. Will Adam Schiff demand hearings on this? Will he move to impeach Obama? (Yes, you can impeach a president after he leaves office) I don’t think that will ever happen.

The Great Rush Limbaugh today played audio of former DNI James Clapper admitting on CNN that Barack Obama made them all spy on President Trump and his campaign.

This was a huge admission by James Clapper. Obama was behind it all. Obama was making the calls to have the FBI and CIA spy on Trump advisers all over Europe.

This is what we all suspected all along.


Click on the link below to hear the audio or read the transcript:

Rush Limbaugh Plays Audio of James Clapper Apparently Showing Obama was Responsible for Spygate
Reply
#72
It's not going well, it seems Hunter Biden wasn't the target of all this, his Father was!



Quote:[Image: attachment.php?aid=6493]


Burisma paid Joe Biden $900,000 for lobbying – Ukrainian MP.


'KYIV. Oct 9 (Interfax-Ukraine) – Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden received $900,000 for lobbying
activities from Burisma Group, Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada member Andriy Derkach said citing investigation
materials.

Derkach publicized documents which, as he said, "describe the mechanism of getting money by Biden Sr."
at a press conference at Interfax-Ukraine's press center in Kyiv on Wednesday.

"This was the transfer of Burisma Group's funds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to
Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based
company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times,
is affiliated with Biden.
The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

He also publicized sums that were transferred to Burisma Group representatives, in particular Hunter Biden,
a son of the former U.S. vice president.

"According to the documents, Burisma paid no less than $16.5 million to [former Polish President, who became
an independent director at Burisma Holdings in 2014] Aleksander Kwasniewski, [chairman of the Burisma board
of independent directors] Alan Apter, [Burisma independent director] Devon Archer and Hunter Biden [who joined
the Burisma board of directors in 2014]," Derkach said.

"Using political and economic levelers of influencing Ukrainian authorities and manipulating the issue of providing
financial aid to Ukraine, Joe Biden actively assisted closing criminal cases into the activity of former Ukrainian
Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, who is the founder and owner of Burisma Group," he said.

"Biden's fifth visit to Kyiv on December 7-8, 2015 was devoted to making a decision on the resignation of [then
Ukrainian Prosecutor General] Viktor Shokin over the case of Zlochevsky and Burisma.
Loan guarantees worth $1 billion that the United States was to give to Ukraine was the point of pressure.

Biden himself admitted exerting pressure in his speech at the Council of Foreign Relations in January 2018,
calling Shokin 'son of a bitch who was fired'," Derkach said.
The timeline of events proves that the U.S. linked the Zlochevsky case to loan guarantees, he said.

After the decree dismissing Shokin was published on April 3, 2016, the governments of the United States and
Ukraine signed a loan guarantee agreement worth $1 billion, several months later, on June 3, he said.

"In this case, there are facts should be subject to investigation. There is an agency that has powers to investigate
them; the U.S. Department of Justice. If the Ukrainian Prosecutor General signs documents and send them to U.S.
Department of Justice without any requests, he will accomplish his mission," he said, adding that the Ukrainian
Prosecutor General has such powers.

"Considering international corruption in public is a way-out for President Zelensky. I am certain that he is not
involved in international corruption," Derkach said.

It was reported earlier that Derkach publicized correspondence between the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of
Ukraine (NABU) and officers of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv. According to publicized correspondence, starting from
July 14, 2017, the lists of criminal proceedings undertaken by NABU officers were sent from the electronic mailbox
of Polina Chyzh, an assistant to NABU first deputy head Gizo Uglava, to the electronic mailbox of Hanna Yemelianova,
a legal specialist of the anti-corruption program of the U.S. Justice Department at U.S. Embassy in Ukraine.

Derkach also said that NABU-leak materials will be published on his Facebook account and materials that he got from
investigating journalists have already been passed to Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigations and the Prosecutor's
General Office.

He also said he will initiate the creation of an ad hoc parliamentary investigative commission and has already
requested launching a criminal case against Ukrainian officials into interference into U.S. elections.
The court session is scheduled for October 21, he said.

Burisma Holdings is a Cyprus-registered gas producing company holding assets in Ukraine. It is one of Ukraine's
top-three independent gas producers headquartered in Kyiv. Zlochevsky is the founder and the ultimate beneficiary
owner of the company...'
SOURCE:


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#73
(10-11-2019, 12:38 PM)BIAD Wrote: It's not going well, it seems Hunter Biden wasn't the target of all this, his Father was!

[url=https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/617936.html][/url]

Funny how one corrupt person leads to another one, and another, and another, and...

An apparent strategy President Trump uses to shed light on the real target.   Well done, Sir!   minusculeclap
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)