Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
They Kept This Quiet - In Eight Days They Sign
#1
Exclamation 
On December 10-11 the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) is expected to be adopted by  (potentially) 192 UN member countries at an intergovernmental conference on international migration in Morocco, after over 2 years of putting this compact together.

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/globa...mber-2018/

Included in that agreement is a far broader definition of hate speech which will result in it becoming illegal to speak against the compact, migration, or migrants in EU member states, or ostensibly any state which signs onto this agreement.







It is expected that Canada and Mexico will both sign onto this agreement as well, just a few days from now.

https://migrationdataportal.org/themes/g...-migration


It might behoove people to read these links.. it affects us all.
Reply
#2
This caught me off guard. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.  I'll have to take some time to look over everything, but just reading what you've posted leaves me feeling "helpless" for those who will be affected the most in other countries. 

This will, no doubt, affect the large social media platforms even more than it is currently. (Duh!)  The censorship is terrible on FB and Twitter now.  I feel sad.   tinycrying
Reply
#3
Sheesh! they're on the ropes with this one!

Medias giving room to speak of migration in a negative capacity can be shut down!

Who the hell do they think they are?! These people weren't elected, they were chosen
by faceless bureaucratic nobodies who see the idea of culturally-stunted people being used
for cheap-labour in Western societies as a good thing.

It will increase sex-trafficking and abuse, the wealthy will widen the gap between themselves
and the have-nots. What was once the 'enlightened' countries of aloof elites wrinkling their
noses at the 'unwashed', will return and they'll feel good for helping the serfs find a place in
the modern world.

On the plus-side, its not binding and is mainly aimed at the foreign celebrity circles.

Thanks Grace for this, I saw it on the BBC website and dismissed it because of the bullsh*t.

(There's a video explaining it further in the link) BBC Link:
Here's what they say:


Quote:"UN reaches deal on Global Compact for Migration
The UN General Assembly has agreed on a deal to better manage the international flow of
migrants and protect human rights. Diplomats from every country except the United States
negotiated as global tensions on the issue continue to cause political upheaval and harsh
anti-immigrant sentiment.

Known as the Global Compact for Migration - it will be formally adopted by world leaders in
Morocco in December. The BBC's Nada Tawfik explains what’s in the agreement."

The only reason the BBC actually used it was because it gives another opportunity to bash Trump.
But not to worry, Morocco's main religion is... oh no!

Here's their silly graph.

[Image: attachment.php?aid=4862]


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
"They watch from behind complacent smiles whilst polishing their cutlery. Yet, with egg between the prongs"
Reply
#4
The Elites of the U N want to Force their Global World Control on us all by turn every Civilized Educated Nation into a Thrid World Shit Hole.

The U N needs to be removed from the Continent of the United States of America and moved to India, Pakistan, (any Country that ends with STAN) Mexico or some other Third World Shit Hole.

Sorry, but that's how I feel, The U N does not care about you and your Standard Of Living, they want to Control Your Every Move, Breath and Thought!

Countries like America have Migration laws and they are easy to follow and by calling a single phone number it's a (1-800 number) you can have your questions answered on how to Migrate to America in any Language You Speak.
Yes, it is true, they will get an interpreter to help you understand how to fill out the Two Page Form.

The cost is not much over $700. dollars to file, yes you have to work and save your money to be able to pay the filing fee.
But yea, you're legal and you're respected for being legal. 

Sorry for Ranting. smallfit
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#5
(12-02-2018, 06:16 PM)guohua Wrote: The Elites of the U N want to Force their Global World Control on us all by turn every Civilized Educated Nation into a Thrid World Shit Hole.

The U N needs to be removed from the Continent of the United States of America and moved to India, Pakistan, (any Country that ends with STAN) Mexico or some other Third World Shit Hole.

Sorry, but that's how I feel, The U N does not care about you and your Standard Of Living, they want to Control Your Every Move, Breath and Thought!

Countries like America have Migration laws and they are easy to follow and by calling a single phone number it's a (1-800 number) you can have your questions answered on how to Migrate to America in any Language You Speak.
Yes, it is true, they will get an interpreter to help you understand how to fill out the Two Page Form.

The cost is not much over $700. dollars to file, yes you have to work and save your money to be able to pay the filing fee.
But yea, you're legal and you're respected for being legal. 

Sorry for Ranting. smallfit



I absolutely agree with you!
Reply
#6
(12-02-2018, 06:00 PM)BIAD Wrote: Sheesh! they're on the ropes with this one!

Medias giving room to speak of migration in a negative capacity can be shut down!

Who the hell do they think they are?! These people weren't elected, they were chosen
by faceless bureaucratic nobodies who see the idea of culturally-stunted people being used
for cheap-labour in Western societies as a good thing.

It will increase sex-trafficking and abuse, the wealthy will widen the gap between themselves
and the have-nots. What was once the 'enlightened' countries of aloof elites wrinkling their
noses at the 'unwashed', will return and they'll feel good for helping the serfs find a place in
the modern world.

On the plus-side, its not binding and is mainly aimed at the foreign celebrity circles.

I'm thinking shutting down media outlets over negative coverage is something Brussels will at least attempt enforcement of throughout the EU.. 

Ive noticed the language being employed toward those member states who want to pick and choose which of the EU's laws they want to follow recently...

Also, I believe Nin spoke to me recently about Brussels saying England can pull out of the EU but they have to continue to be governed by EU agreements or something of that nature? I'm not exactly sure what that was about, but does that mean this will also apply to England as well?

It's the silencing of speech that I find most worrisome. If/when things begin getting very bad we won't hear a peep, and silencing speech is always the first step before the really bad things begin.
Reply
#7
Might have something to do with this

Quote:MEP WARNS UN PACT WILL FLOOD EUROPE WITH 59 MILLION MIGRANTS BY 2025

“Say goodbye to your democracy and way of life”
Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - NOVEMBER 30, 2018 


[Image: 141215migrants.jpg]


British MEP Janice Atkinson warns that the UN Compact on Migration would lead to Europe being flooded with 59 million new migrants within the next 6 years.
The document is not legally binding, but governments will be under pressure to follow its dictates. Numerous countries, including the United States and Hungary, have said they will refuse to sign the pact.
“If you think you’re in control of your borders, think again,” said Atkinson, adding, “This compact backs the EU and the UN’s aim to flood our nations with 59 million migrants by 2025…. just 6 years.”



Atkinson went on to explain the source of the new pact; A 2000 declaration that concluded Europe’s ethnic population was in decline “and therefore needed replacing.”
This has been disproven by youth unemployment in some European countries being 50% or higher, as well as many new migrants being “unemployable,” with only around 13% employed on average according to Atkinson.
The MEP savaged British Prime Minister Theresa May for promising to take back control of British borders via Brexit and yet planning to sign the UN migration pact next month.
“Remember – the UN and the globalists want to flood our continent with 59 million migrants by 2025,” Atkinson emphasized, adding that the UN document states mass immigration is “inevitable, desirable and necessary.”
Warning that the plan would lead to European countries having their “culture and identity crushed,” Atkinson also pointed out that the pact could lead to hate speech laws that make it illegal to use the term “illegal migrants,” replacing it instead with “irregular migrants”.
“It will be illegal not to use their prescribed language,” warned Atkinson, adding that European citizens could “say goodbye to your democracy and your way of life,” unless they demand their leaders refuse to sign the document.
The MEP’s concern about language policing is shared by Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff, who said that the pact would grease the skids for laws that would criminalize criticism of mass immigration as hate speech.











[Image: IWL-CW-GEN-800-Blue-RC.jpg]
[/url][url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infowars.official]
Reply
#8
And this, I have known about this for a wile. The person gets a small fine but has a criminal record for hate speech so finds it hard to get a job or can even be dismissed from there job. Wonderful way of controlling the people. They want the same system in the UK

Quote:SWEDEN: 70-YEAR-OLD WOMAN INTERROGATED, CONVICTED FOR ANTI-MUSLIM FACEBOOK POST

Pensioner expressed concern about Islamic takeover
Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - NOVEMBER 29, 2018 


[Image: 070518sweden.jpg]


A 70-year-old woman in Sweden was interrogated by police and later convicted for an anti-Muslim Facebook post in which she expressed fear that Islam was taking over the country.
The post, made in May 2018 on the Facebook group Stand Up For Sweden, appeared as a comment underneath an article about violence towards women.
“Is this not Sweden or have we turned over the country to some Muslim damned vermin?,” the woman wrote.
The post was flagged by taxpayer funded hate speech watchdog group Näthats-inspector and the woman was subsequently interrogated by police in Hudiksvall.
She admitted that she could have framed the post better but asserted that she was merely upset after reading material about the mistreatment of women in Islamic countries.
“I am against the fact that they are bad to women. We have so many Muslims coming. I must have meant that they are battering women. I’m afraid of that,” she told police, adding that she had been “provoked” by news headlines about the issue.
The woman as later convicted and ordered to pay 40 daily fines of 120 kronor.
The judge in the case said that the Facebook post was more of an assertion than a question and therefore violated Sweden’s hate speech laws.
Similar laws that would officially make “Islamophobia” a racist hate crime are now being discussed in the United Kingdom.
Earlier this year, a 65-year-old woman in Sweden who was previously the victim of a brutal beating by migrants was sentenced to prison for posting that “the IQ level in Sweden will fall as a result of immigration.”
In another case, a 32-year-old woman from Gothernburg was interrogated by police, had her DNA taken and was subsequently imprisoned for the “crime” of sharing a joke meme about Islam on Facebook.
Last year, a 70-year-old Swedish woman was prosecuted for hate speech for saying she saw migrants setting fire to cars, something that happens all the time in Sweden.
Also last year, Sweden put YouTube star PewDiePie, their biggest export since Abba and Ikea furniture, on an official hate list.

Reply
#9
@Grace  
Quote:Also, I believe Nin spoke to me recently about Brussels saying England can pull out of the EU but they have to continue to be governed by EU agreements or something of that nature? I'm not exactly sure what that was about, but does that mean this will also apply to England as well?

England needs to tell the EU to Mind Their Own Business and to Continue To Swirl Down The Toilet With-Out England as they Cater to Elites and the NWO.
The EU needs to be Disbanded along with the UN, nothing good as come from either Organization.
Stop All Migration and get their Once Great Country back Under Control, those areas that can not be patrolled by Police or Visited by other than Muslims.
Needs to be Cleaned Out Forcibly and Offenders Deported or Jailed. 
JMHO
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#10
Explanation: @Grace ...

I have slowly learned in my 46yrs of life that Everything is Forbidden/Banned and therefor do whatever the hell you want to do without any fear BUT just don't get caught at doing what you are doing OR you are gonna have a bad time M'kay!

Personal Disclosure: We still have RN3 as our own personal uplink to the entire internet and for now only a few mods have to police it and I am off the opinion that we are fair and evenhanded and we get it right most of the time so please feel free to express yourself fully as the globalization UN has no business in here and I outright reject the UN's broadening of hate speech laws and attempts to muzzle the nationalist opposition from loudly declaiming and disclaiming their dirty filthy socialist combine everything in one pot without a 2nd thought or care for how its gonna turn out and taste like when its fully cooked ideology and agenda ... and although I may or may not agree with anybody on anything they have to say I will defend to the death their rights to say it and have their own say for whatever that is worth.


@ Migrants ... Stay the legal course ok and go the distance and you'll do ok!

@ Illegal Immigrants ... Stay the fuck out of mine and my friends countries and now STFU and go back home!

@ Refugees ... I can only wish you the very best in your applications to be accepted as real refugees and I say don't give up hope!

@ People fleeing ECONOMIC CRISISES from their own original country of birth ... Shame on you ... you made your bed now go back and lie down in it!

@ Any and All Travelers ... GET A VALID VISA FIRST OK!

minusculebeercheers
Reply
#11
(12-02-2018, 07:24 PM)OmegaLogos Wrote: Explanation: @Grace ...

I have slowly learned in my 46yrs of life that Everything is Forbidden/Banned and therefor do whatever the hell you want to do without any fear BUT just don't get caught at doing what you are doing OR you are gonna have a bad time M'kay!

Personal Disclosure: We still have RN3 as our own personal uplink to the entire internet and for now only a few mods have to police it and I am off the opinion that we are fair and evenhanded and we get it right most of the time so please feel free to express yourself fully as the globalization UN has no business in here and I outright reject the UN's broadening of hate speech laws and attempts to muzzle the nationalist opposition from loudly declaiming and disclaiming their dirty filthy socialist combine everything in one pot without a 2nd thought or care for how its gonna turn out and taste like when its fully cooked ideology and agenda ... and although I may or may not agree with anybody on anything they have to say I will defend to the death their rights to say it and have their own say for whatever that is worth.


@ Migrants ... Stay the legal course ok and go the distance and you'll do ok!

@ Illegal Immigrants ... Stay the fuck out of mine and my friends countries and now STFU and go back home!

@ Refugees ... I can only wish you the very best in your applications to be accepted as real refugees and I say don't give up hope!

@ People fleeing ECONOMIC CRISISES from their own original country of birth ... Shame on you ... you made your bed now go back and lie down in it!

@ Any and All Travelers ... GET A VALID VISA FIRST OK!

minusculebeercheers
@OmegaLogos 
smallawesome   minusculeknocks   minusculeclap
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#12
(12-02-2018, 06:42 PM)Grace Wrote: ...Also, I believe Nin spoke to me recently about Brussels saying England can pull out
of the EU but they have to continue to be governed by EU agreements or something
of that nature?

I'm not exactly sure what that was about, but does that mean this will also apply to England
as well?

Yeah, the MSM are keeping the pressure on the British public to make sure they believe
the EU hold all the power. Many don't realise that it's merely a trade-deal environment
and not some-sort of excommunication from culturally-different societies.

The boundary between Southern Ireland and Northern Ireland was always there since
they parted, all this concern about so-called export-import problems is just another
scare tactic for the sake of TV ratings and column-inches.

The fishing sites around our coast can be properly utilised again and the British farmers
will have to rely on growing retail-friendly crops once more, instead of relying on hefty
subsidies to leave their lands fallow.
They were even paid extra to plant flowers around their crops!

I heard one young girl this morning on TV saying that by leaving the EU, she could no
longer travel Europe and other parts of the world for free because of... some sh*t she'd
been fed by the controlled media. Free?!

During the run-up to the referendum on leaving, Project Fear warned the British public
that the sky would fall in. The media enjoyed the drama without reporting the real problems
of undoing the pact.

We did adopt some regulations and when dealing with crime, trade and legal immigration
from other lands, that would make sense. But the public voted to leave the controlling
mechanism known as the European Union because some of those 'rules' were being abused
for the sake of politically-driven agendas of countries not in the EU.

That was why racial accusations had to be ramped-up and that's why stifling of speech had
to be intensified on major internet platforms. These guys aren't stopping hate-speech, it's the
first steps to attempt to stop free-thought.

Orwell was bang-on the money.
minusculethumbsup
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
"They watch from behind complacent smiles whilst polishing their cutlery. Yet, with egg between the prongs"
Reply
#13
(12-02-2018, 07:50 PM)BIAD Wrote: Orwell was bang-on the money.
minusculethumbsup

Orwell was either a time traveler,  or else he knew how to remote view into the future.   tinysurprised
Reply
#14
(12-02-2018, 07:18 PM)guohua Wrote: ...England needs to tell the EU to Mind Their Own Business and to Continue To Swirl Down
The Toilet With-Out England as they Cater to Elites and the NWO...

The problem is that they don't see themselves in the way we do. They are elite, but the EU
Commission and it's lackeys perceive themselves as better. But not better as you being a
lesser person, just a person who need guidance and a parenting hand.

"You just don't know any better, bless you..." "Everything we do, we do for you..."
"I'm only wealthy because I have more responsibilities than you..."

As in:

Quote:'Macrons want swimming pool installed at historic presidential retreat...'

'French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte want a private
swimming pool to be built at the historic presidential retreat Fort de Brégançon
which lies on an island just off the south coast of France.

Macron certainly doesn't seem too concerned about shaking off his image
as a "president of the rich"...'
Local:

It's not his money, but what else can you do with it...? Waste it on those he can glean
no 'good-feelz' from? No, of course not. Rather to cater for his wealthy friends and
the poor down-trodden brown migrant who doesn't know any better.

Okay, they rape and pillage a bit, but the Pope will get me the nod when my time comes!





[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
"They watch from behind complacent smiles whilst polishing their cutlery. Yet, with egg between the prongs"
Reply
#15
1) I'm not real clear on why Theresa may feels a need to have an "exit deal". Why not just tell the EU to fuck off and stay on their side of the Channel? I suspect that since the EU started out as the EEC, a purely economic program before it went all rogue and political, that the reason has something to do with economics.

2) I sense an economic opportunity to enhance both the US and the UK via stronger trade deals across the Atlantic instead of across the Channel. Uncle Donnie might want to look into that. It would be good for the both of us.

3) While I don't advocate disbanding the EU, since I have no dog in that fight (that is for the Europeans to figure out), I DO advocate that the US - and any other sensible nation involved - extract themselves from both the UN and NATO, and even the EU for that matter. The UN was never a good idea, it was just a reaction by a war-weary world after WWII, and has outlived it's usefulness by decades. Similarly, NATO has outlived it's remit, since it has been a few decades now since the demise of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, which it was the sole purpose of NATO to counter. NATO won, and should have retired, when it admitted former Warsaw Pact nations. Admitting Turkey was a step way too far, and it's not the NORTH ATLANTIC Treaty organization any more, not after that. NATO is now useless, a waste of money.

Exit NATO and let the EU pay for it instead, and exit the UN, boot their asses out of New York, and let them settle in Brussels or somewhere like that, where the bastards belong. The EU can pay that burden, too,and foot the bills for the 90% of freeloader member nations. The US has better things to do with our money. We can save it up for the day Chuck Schumer kicks the bucket so we'll have a nest egg to get started on repairing our infrastructure that he wants to leave rotting.

4) While the US Constitution guarantees our freedom of speech via the First Amendment, I don't know what the setup is in other countries - they may have no such guarantee. I am utterly unwilling to apply US law to other, sovereign, nations. That is for the people of those nations to decide. If they decide in favor of freedom, then there ought to be riots in the streets and revolution in the hills if their government betrays them and signs on to this draconian compact.

5) Fuck the UN, the EU, and the tanks they rode in on. The EU is nothing more than the modern-day Warsaw Pact replacement.

.
“The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people.”

-Aldous Huxley

-- Got mask? Just sayin'...




Reply
#16
(12-08-2018, 10:20 AM)Ninurta Wrote: 1) I'm not real clear on why Theresa may feels a need to have an "exit deal".
Why not just tell the EU to fuck off and stay on their side of the Channel?
I suspect that since the EU started out as the EEC, a purely economic program before it went all
rogue and political, that the reason has something to do with economics.

My wife kicks my ass for my lust for deconstruction! The idea of trade can be something that many believe is complicated.
It actually isn't, we've been doing it since we grasped the concept of worth.

Also, unlike Ninurta, many people fall under the impression that if something that involves official-looking departments,
well-dressed people who speak their minds confidently with the use of large words, a mosaic-stye of communication access
and a logistics system that resembles a spider's web, then it must have merit in today's societies.

Again, it doesn't. All it needs is a market-place where one person has something another wants. The rest of the structure
comes along for the same reason. The procurement of money. The European Union is about Merchants, dealers in creating
trade, selling ideas and brokering deals. They don't generate anything accept a club-like mentality that persuades those who
have materials to sell to those the merchants prefer that require the commodities.

Well-oiled systems assure the seller benefits from choosing that buyer and to stay in that 'club', and oddly enough, the 'grease'
to get the best market-spot doesn't come from the organiser, the monies to make everything work smoothly comes from seller
and buyer.

So basically, anyone in that club makes money... lots of money and for those who maintain such a large organised forum, the
finance to create the European marketplace derives from the countries involved. The buyers and sellers.
One has to wonder, what would you be willing to do to maintain such a system?
..............................................

I believe that the majority of reasons -real reasons, May is attempting to sell her version of a deal to the UK populace
is because of many of the old-school members in her party and of the Labour party, have financial ties with mainland
European companies that benefit from the manner of trading with Great Britain.

That's why those not 'wetting their beaks' -the public, grabbed the opportunity to get out from the stifling control the EU
Commission's holds over the UK. It has constantly degraded important British industries that provided income to the
communities that grew up around that industry.

Remember, this isn't about being in the European Union, it's about businesses that utilise its regulations of trade
and creating a network of import/export that countries must comply to. If a country wants coal mining to improve and
ergo, generate employment for its voters, then a EU member will have to recede their own coal industry to keep a
level market consumption.

A glut of coal would bring the price down, of course and that wouldn't be beneficial to the seller. Cuts would have to
be made and unemployment would ensue. Ask Greece about olive-growing and tourism!

We use coal for power stations... where does the UK get its coal? Russia, but they're not in the EU.
We use gas for household heating... Where does the UK acquire its gas? Norway, but they're not in the EU.
(Norway is in something called 'The European Economic Area', which allows thems to be in the EU's single market)

Businesses, not countries favour the European Union system. Not being in the EU, doesn't mean you're 'out'!
Theresa May is sucking the dicks of the powerful men and women who manage the continental Mafia because many
in her political party -donors, have told her not to listen to the public.
(May's husband is in deep with some of the businesses that swim the waters of the European Union too)

Quote:2) I sense an economic opportunity to enhance both the US and the UK via stronger trade deals across the
Atlantic instead of across the Channel. Uncle Donnie might want to look into that. It would be good for the
both of us.

You'd be surprised how many of the British people would jump at this chance! I know we already have trading-ties with the
US  and so has other countries in the EU. But that is a problem for Juncker, Merkel and the rest of the EU heads. The main
reason -although the MSM won't even bring this up, is because the EU fear the US getting their own guys in and using the
trading system with chief-aims to benefit that side of the pond.

This might not make sense considering I suggested that it's businesses that benefit and not countries, but when dealing with
public perceptions, it's important to understand how the Old World's ways of thinking and the New World's view of how the
real world turns are very different and the major obstacle is the US's sense of freedom.

If the US tried to take on the liberty-restraining regulations that the EU have dumped on the masses of Europe, that gun that
Ninurta enjoys would burn hot with his outrage! So the obvious answer would be for those in power -and wish to stay in power
in the US, would be to change, manipulate and dilute the rules set-out by the EU to benefit the USA.
And by doing so, not only be seen to take it over, it would seriously damage certain parties accesses to grooming wealth.

In some minds, you can't have a United States of The Northern Hemisphere -or even the world, so you have to have smaller
clubs! Globalism isn't global... it never was.

By the way, the EU Commission are the actual decision-makers, the EU Council debates all the suggested regulations and
then it's put to the Commission to whether they get the nod or not.
(Look at Juncker, top-dog and yet when President Trump announced he was raising tariffs, it was he who scuttled over to the
White House and brokered a better deal for both parties. The optics on that were really smothered over here!)

De' Mafia.
President -Jean-Claude Juncker. First Vice-President -Frans Timmermans.
High Representative & Vice President -Federica Mogherini. Vice President -Andrus Ansip.
Vice President -Maroš Šefčovič. Vice President -Valdis Dombrovskis. Vice President -Jyrki Katainen.

Commissioner -Günther H. Oettinger. Commissioner -Johannes Hahn. Commissioner -Cecilia Malmström.
Commissioner -Neven Mimica.Commissioner -Miguel Arias Cañete. Commissioner -Karmenu Vella.
Commissioner -Vytenis Andriukaitis. Commissioner -Dimitris Avramopoulos. Commissioner -Pierre Moscovici.
Commissioner -Christos Stylianides. Commissioner -Phil Hogan. Commissioner -Violeta Bulc.
Commissioner -Elżbieta Bieńkowska. Commissioner -Věra Jourová. Commissioner -Tibor Navracsics.
Commissioner -Corina Crețu. Commissioner -Margrethe Vestager. Commissioner -Carlos Moedas.
Commissioner -Julian King. Commissioner -Mariya Gabriel.

(The f*ckin pensions waiting in the wings for these guys are unbelievable! Private shopping malls, no required
receipts for purchases and refunded without proof or audit, golden parachutes when leaving, expenses involving
refunded first-class flying, 'ghost offices' 249 of 'em -where monies were taken to staff and pay rent for and didn't
exist... the gang really know how to milk their organised system!)

Quote:3) While I don't advocate disbanding the EU, since I have no dog in that fight (that is for the Europeans
to figure out), I DO advocate that the US - and any other sensible nation involved - extract themselves
from both the UN and NATO, and even the EU for that matter.

The UN was never a good idea, it was just a reaction by a war-weary world after WWII, and has outlived
it's usefulness by decades.
Similarly, NATO has outlived it's remit, since it has been a few decades now since the demise of the Soviet
Union and the Warsaw Pact, which it was the sole purpose of NATO to counter.

NATO won, and should have retired, when it admitted former Warsaw Pact nations. Admitting Turkey was a
step way too far, and it's not the NORTH ATLANTIC Treaty organization any more, not after that.
NATO is now useless, a waste of money.

Exit NATO and let the EU pay for it instead, and exit the UN, boot their asses out of New York, and let them
settle in Brussels or somewhere like that, where the bastards belong. The EU can pay that burden, too, and
foot the bills for the 90% of freeloader member nations. The US has better things to do with our money.

We can save it up for the day Chuck Schumer kicks the bucket so we'll have a nest egg to get started on
repairing our infrastructure that he wants to leave rotting.

Oh that's just great...! The European countries paying their own way in protecting themselves from enemies, who's ever heard of such
an absurd thing?! Self-accountability is a good thing and should be crowed about, but in Europe why should the powers-that-be agree
to fund their own defences when they've been sucking the USA's teat for so long and pocketing it?
(Obvious sarcasm!)

Of course you're right, Ninurta. The US did fly in and save the day with WWII and I can see how the willingness to help whilst European
countries found their training-wheels is an act that doesn't only promote peace, it brings commerce and financial rewards as well.

But those days are far behind us now and the EU want to stand alone as a wished-for United States of Europe. That teat should be
withdrawn whether they like it or not.

Quote:4) While the US Constitution guarantees our freedom of speech via the First Amendment, I don't know
what the setup is in other countries - they may have no such guarantee.
I am utterly unwilling to apply US law to other, sovereign, nations. That is for the people of those nations
to decide.
If they decide in favor of freedom, then there ought to be riots in the streets and revolution in the hills if
their government betrays them and signs on to this draconian compact.

There's the problem, the nationwide engrained belief that you're freedom is something more than just an idea, it's a right.
You kicked Great Britain out of your country because you didn't like the harness... a harness the British public have always worn
and don't know any better. It's a state of mind-thing, it's why certain parties are f*cking with Trump right now.

The gun-issue isn't a big deal over here because of the mind-set that's been pushed for centuries and to be flippant, MK-Ultra
is a pussy cat compared to what the Establishment brainwashed Europe with over that time.

Example of the differences in the European public's perception of their place in the world against the USA's impression of it.
Two donkeys meet at a hitching rail in a western town.
One of them is a town donkey with nothing on his back but a saddle.
The other is a prospector's donkey, loaded down with packs, camping and cooking gear and sacks of ore. His back is bent
from the weight.
The town donkey says "that's quite a load you've got there".
The prospector's donkey replies "what load?"
(I love that one!)

Quote:5) Fuck the UN, the EU, and the tanks they rode in on. The EU is nothing more than the modern-day Warsaw Pact
replacement.

Nuff said.
minusculethumbsup
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
"They watch from behind complacent smiles whilst polishing their cutlery. Yet, with egg between the prongs"
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)