Propaganda watch

[BIAD]

I'm not a fan of Bill Clinton, but he's actually doing what most men do, admiring the female form.
I vaguely know who Ariana Grande is from the UK-Manchester concert bombing and she seems to
hold a current style of attractiveness for males.

I would like to write that Clinton is probably play-acting to indicate his marvel for the alleged singer,
but he's always been one for perceiving women as mere vessels for his lust and has no regard for their
status as a human-being. 'You better get some ice on that.'
 
I know that it isn't in vogue at the moment and there's a level of decorum that we're supposed to adhere
to, but Bill Clinton in the above image is doing something that is built-in to the male-psyche, checking for
fat-distribution and being mentally-held by the age-old approach to mounting a female in a way that is
deemed normal in the natural world.

It's coarse to speak like this -I know, and it also dilutes the in-group, out-group situation on discussion sites
such as Rogue Nation, but it's real and what concerns me-personally is -not only the belligerent manner that
Bill Clinton interacts with females, but his assumption that he can do it and get away with it because he simply
believes he's better than his victims.

Maybe Amaterasu Solar was correct when he called them all psychopaths!

We need to to get out of this pretentious sphere of being outraged at the basic make-up of men and
women and get back to what a civilised society takes as 'normal'. The whole dichotomy of sexual behavior
has been compressed into pockets of innuendo and maybes, a corralled system where real sexual predators
can enjoy the foggy hunting-grounds of 'How-Dare-You'-ness where the bleating weak roam.

I agree an ex-President should hold himself to a higher standard than a leering cigar-case-wielding freak who
married something that's supposed to be a woman, the post of a leader has qualities that demands the bearer
to carry them for the rest of their lives. Clinton -both of them in fact, degraded his position just like many noted
leaders have all around the world.

Men are men and women are women. For the media, anything in between usually has some-sort of lurid sexual
connotation to it for ratings-value only. The problem with this is it promotes negative conduct and debatable
practices for the sole reason of keeping the media employed and by doing so, implies it's acceptable.

You'll notice that they never bring a guy onto the stage that's called 'Joe' and he's a mechanic who's married with a
couple of kids and hasn't done anything outrageous or holds what they consider intrigue. 

Being a standard part of a community isn't sexy... isn't 'news' anymore. Being a male in a dress visiting one of Target's
unisex toilets is. It's simply because people with a certain view on the world think everyone else around them thinks
that way. But it's never worked like that, some are good and kind, others prey on the blindness to evil actions.

People can be good and people can be bad, there's no divine system that can stop us from crossing the agreed societal
lines. All we can do is try to get along with each other in a non-destructive way.

Hence my Username, it confuses people on the internet with what reality really is! I ain't a boy and I don't wear a dress!
(But Bill is still a pervert.)