Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5G is a Sterilization & Eugenics Program
#1
It is imperative that everyone listen to this video!  Our future and our life depends on stopping this! 


Quote:Deborah Tavares from StopTheCrime.net joins me for this emergency broadcast recorded tonight May 7, 2018. It is now overwhelmingly obvious that the 5G rollout is a Biometric weapons system and a mass sterilization and eugenics program. Please folks, stand up and DO something about it NOW.




Reply
#2
A good thread, I need to think about this for a wile. A system like 5g would make a wonderful weapon to kill part of a group of people like refugees or something like that. I think one could call it a targeted weapon.
Reply
#3
(05-08-2018, 06:51 PM)Wallfire Wrote: A good thread, I need to think about this for a wile. A system like 5g would make a wonderful weapon to kill part of a group of people like refugees or something like that. I think one could call it a targeted weapon.

But when they are putting up the 5G towers all over the place, we are ALL the target.  At least, this seems to be the case in the U.S.



Reply
#4
I have had a little time now to read up about 5g, and what I have found is very worrying. It seems that the frequency used in 5g can be very harmful to humans, and because 5g does not carry as far as 4g there will be a need for many small booster stations built into street lights thus increasing the exposeyer of people to 5g.
Its not too far of a step to think that the government could add a signal to 5g that can affect people in a small area , say one area of a city that has a problem population without affecting other areas . Short term exposer would be harmless but long term leading to early death or sterilization.
Reply
#5
(05-09-2018, 05:14 PM)Wallfire Wrote: I have had a little time now to read up about 5g, and what I have found is very worrying. It seems that the frequency used in 5g can be very harmful to humans, and because 5g does not carry as far as 4g there will be a need for many small booster stations built into street lights thus increasing the exposeyer of people to 5g.
Its not too far of a step to think that the government could add a signal to 5g that can affect people in a small area , say one area of a city that has a problem population without affecting other areas . Short term exposer would be harmless but long term leading to early death or sterilization.

Yes, I've done lots of posts about this type of thing (before you became a member), and it's BAD... REALLY BAD!   tinycrying



Reply
#6
Quote:'...One study lead by Dr. Yuri D Feldman at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that human sweat ducts act as an
array of tiny, helix-shaped antennas when exposed to millimeter waves.
The findings suggest that human skin not only absorbs but actually amplifies the radiation from millimeter wave networks.

According to Dr. Feldman and team, “the full ramifications of what these findings represent in the human condition are still
very unclear”. They add that further study is “poignant now because of the interest of industry to exploit precisely this signal
range (100 GHz – 400 GHz) for communications and possible consequent side effects on the public.”

Even so, wireless companies are developing and deploying millimeter wave networks without any in-depth or long-term
studies on health...'
SOURCE:

Quote:Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?

'Highlights
•RF-EMF exposure is rising and health effects of are still under investigation.
•Both oncologic and non-cancerous chronic effects have been suggested.
•5G networks could have health effects and will use MMW, still scarcely explored.
•Adequate knowledge of RF-EMF biological effects is also needed in clinical practice.
•Underrating the problem could lead to a further rise in noncommunicable diseases.

Abstract
The spread of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is rising and health effects are still under investigation.
RF-EMF promote oxidative stress, a condition involved in cancer onset, in several acute and chronic diseases and in
vascular homeostasis.

Although some evidences are still controversial, the WHO IARC classified RF-EMF as “possible carcinogenic to humans”,
and more recent studies suggested reproductive, metabolic and neurologic effects of RF-EMF, which are also able to alter
bacterial antibiotic resistance.

In this evolving scenario, although the biological effects of 5G communication systems are very scarcely investigated,
an international action plan for the development of 5G networks has started, with a forthcoming increment in devices
and density of small cells, and with the future use of millimeter waves (MMW).

Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation
and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages,
affect neuro-muscular dynamics.

Further studies are needed to better and independently explore the health effects of RF-EMF in general and of MMW in particular.
However, available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle,
to define exposed subjects as potentially vulnerable and to revise existing limits.

An adequate knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms linking RF-EMF exposure to health risk should also be useful in the
current clinical practice, in particular in consideration of evidences pointing to extrinsic factors as heavy contributors to cancer risk
and to the progressive epidemiological growth of noncommunicable diseases...'
ScienceDirect:
[Image: attachment.php?aid=953]
Reply
#7
This is something I need more time to look into, but from what I have seen its not looking good. Thanks MW for showing us
Reply
#8
(05-09-2018, 08:26 PM)Wallfire Wrote: This is something I need more time to look into, but from what I have seen its not looking good. Thanks MW for showing us

You're welcome. 

I hope a lot of people will take time to learn just how dangerous this is so we can fight it.



Reply
#9
I have now had time to read up about 5G and to be honest I can find nothing good about it.
I understand its faster but the normal person will not notice it compared to high speed 4G, only firms who need to move large amounts of data will need it.
It need lots of "booster stations" because the signal cant travel far ( its possible every street light will have a station built into it), this also means that you can be pinpointed to with in a few meters wile in the city.
The signal has been proven to be harm humans, and from what I have read I mean VERY harmful.
So this is just a small amount of bad things about 5G, so why is there such a hurry to set it up?? We are only now starting to understand that 4G could be harmful, so lets all move to the next system that has been proven to be harmful !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe it is all about sterilization and kill us off.



                         HELP
Reply
#10
(05-23-2018, 04:40 PM)Wallfire Wrote: I have now had time to read up about 5G and to be honest I can find nothing good about it.
I understand its faster but the normal person will not notice it compared to high speed 4G, only firms who need to move large amounts of data will need it.
It need lots of "booster stations" because the signal cant travel far ( its possible every street light will have a station built into it), this also means that you can be pinpointed to with in a few meters wile in the city.
The signal has been proven to be harm humans, and from what I have read I mean VERY harmful.
So this is just a small amount of bad things about 5G, so why is there such a hurry to set it up?? We are only now starting to understand that 4G could be harmful, so lets all move to the next system that has been proven to be harmful !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe it is all about sterilization and kill us off.



                         HELP

Yes!  HELP, INDEED!   tinybighuh

It is up to us, the people who have taken time to research this to spread the word about how dangerous it is and let others know who only pay attention to how much faster it will make their downloads.  Sigh...

We need to protest, call our reps, whatever it takes to fight this!   smallupset



Reply
#11
@Wallfire asked for HELP in his last post, so here you go...

Dustin comes on at the 4:00 mark to explain certain things we can all do to protect ourselves from 5G.
I hope it doesn't pass government testing, but there is lots of money to be made using it, so I'm sure the health implications of humans will be overlooked so the rich can get richer.   tinyok
Do these people not realize they can't take their money with them when they die?   tinyshocked



Quote:Ultra-High Frequency Radiation (24 to 100 GHz or more)

2. Aimed & Amplified Signals
3. Massive Deployment of Towers
4. Rake in Billions in economic activity
5. No Standards, No Testing, anything Goes.
6. All areas (including rural, saturated with radiation via Satellites)
7. it harms plant and animal life.
8. Basically weaponized EMF cancer beams. Capable of cooking eyeballs like eggs if they wanted to. Do we want a ring of satellites around the planet pushing this to 'every inch' ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5AYR...
https://eluxemagazine.com/magazine/da...
http://longevityrescuer.com/understan...
https://www.infowars.com/5g-wireless-...

- Smart Meters

customers smart meter health complaints, which include sleep problems, headaches, nausea, anxiety, heart palpitations, tinnitus and ear pain, concentration and memory problems, dizziness, immune, nervous and hormonal system impacts. "Because RF radiation is a possible carcinogen, and smart meters give off RF radiation, it is possible that smart meters could increase cancer risk." Smart Meters - American Cancer Society
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-...
https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.c...
https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.c...

Wifi and Cell Phones

1. Contributes to the Development of Insomnia
2. Damaging to Childhood Development
3. Affects Cell Growth
4. Derails Brain Function
5. Reduces Brain Activity in Females
6. Neutralizes Sperm
7. May Impact Fertility
8. Provokes Cardiac Stress
9. Linked to Cancer? https://www.globalhealingcenter.com/n...

- How can RF Energy Hurt you?

Moderate level exposures cause heat stress and behavioral changes. The effects are often mistaken for the flu because the symptoms are similar. As the level of exposure increases, the potential for harm increases.
Human cells die at 107° Fahrenheit. This is the reason why doctors get concerned if someone’s temperature goes above 105°. The body is constantly replacing cells, so the amount of damage that is done depends on how many cells are killed and the type of cells that are killed. Kill off some cells, and the effects may pass in minutes or hours. Destroy a lot of liver cells for instance, and you will have liver damage. If the damage is not too severe, the body can repair itself.
However, if the damage is extensive, the effects may be permanent! Perhaps the most vulnerable organs are the eyes.
The eyes have virtually no blood flow that can provide cooling from other parts of the body, and their dimensions make them very good antennas at microwave frequencies. https://www.rfsafetysolutions.com/RF%...

Affiliate Links Amazon (lower shipping, higher prices) - https://amzn.to/2LTvZyj Shungite.com (Direct from Russia, great prices, some shipping!) https://store.shungite.com/?aff_id=4951 Shungite Powder https://amzn.to/2LTvZyj Smart Meter Guard: https://amzn.to/2t1aRPo This simple device is proven to reduce smart meter radiation by up to 98% in all directions.



https://youtu.be/PZPkFJx8KMA



Reply
#12
Just found this,,,, 
Quote:Hang up! Radiation from mobile phones can affect your memory 
Duh!!!  smalltappingfoot
Who didn't know that could Happen To You?

If you followed Our Site, @Wallfire  &  @Mystic Wanderer  and others here, would keep you well informed of these Dangers.
Quote:WASHINGTON D.C. : Mobile phone radiation may affect memory performance in adolescents, according to a new study. 


The rapid evolution of information and communication technologies (ICT) goes along with an increase in exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) in our daily life. 

The most relevant exposure source to the brain is the use of a mobile phone close to the head. 

The study found that cumulative RF-EMF brain exposure from mobile phone use over one year may have a negative effect on the development of figural memory performance in adolescents, confirming prior results published in 2015.

Figural memory is mainly located in the right brain hemisphere and association with RF-EMF was more pronounced in adolescents using the mobile phone on the right side of the head. 

"This may suggest that indeed RF-EMF absorbed by the brain is responsible for the obs .. 

Source
I ask YOU, Yes YOU the mother that gives her Kindergarten aged Child a Cell Phone.
How much damage are YOU doing?
Actually Any Child of learning Age.
[Image: videos-ninos-hablando-telefono-T-HF1Ec5.jpeg] [Image: 20150311_021708_0311kidtech1-1.jpg?w=620]
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#13
Yes, Ms. G. it is very harmful to children, yet some parents allow their children, or grandchildren to 'play' with them.
It's become the new babysitter.

Children will sit and stare at the phone for hours. That right there should tell you there is something affecting their brain. This is not 'normal' for a child.



Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)