Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pope Benedict Was Forced To Resign By ‘Deep State’
#1
Hmmm...  I've been wondering all this time why he resigned.  Now we all know.  I always got a bad feeling from him, but they say he was a conservative, so go figure. Apparently, he didn't fit the bill for what the Elite Deep State wanted the Vatican to do.

[Image: pope-benedict-coup-deep-state.jpg]

Quote:George Soros, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the Vatican to overthrow conservative Pope Benedict in February 2013, according to WikiLeaks emails. 

Pope Benedict became the first pope to resign since Pope Gregory XII in 1415, and the first one to do so on his own initiative since Pope Celestine V in 1294.

Gloria.tv reports: However the group of Catholic leaders cite new evidence uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks to claim the conservative Pope Benedict did not actually resign on his own initiative, but was pushed out of the Vatican by a coup that the group of researchers are calling the “Catholic Spring.”

Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church in order to replace the conservative Benedict with the current Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world.

Now the group of Catholic leaders have sent a letter to President Trump urging him to launch an official investigation into the activities of George Soros, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (and others) who they allege were involved in orchestrating Catholic Spring that resulted in their goal of “regime change” in the Vatican.

The Catholic leaders cite eight specific questions they seek to have answered concerning suspect events that led to the resignation of Pope Benedict, the first papal abdication in 700 years.

“Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration,” say the petitioners, in their January 20 letter to President Trump.
“We were alarmed to discover,” their letter notes, “that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”

The letter includes links to documents and news stories underscoring their claims. It first directs attention to the notorious Soros-Clinton-Podesta e-mails disclosed last year by WikiLeaks, in which Podesta and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church.

Regarding the Podesta e-mails in question, The New American reported last October:
“Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region. The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholics leaders write: “Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left. The Pontificate of Pope Francis has subsequently called into question its own legitimacy on a multitude of occasions.”

“We remain puzzled by the behavior of this ideologically charged Pope, whose mission seems to be one of advancing secular agendas of the left rather than guiding the Catholic Church in Her sacred mission,” they say, expressing the thoughts of millions of Catholics around the world stunned by Pope Francis’s left-wing ideology. “It is simply not the proper role of a Pope to be involved in politics to the point that he is considered to be the leader of the international left.”

They continue:
“With all of this in mind, and wishing the best for our country as well as for Catholics worldwide, we believe it to be the responsibility of loyal and informed United States Catholics to petition you to authorize an investigation into the following questions:
– To what end was the National Security Agency monitoring the conclave that elected Pope Francis?
– What other covert operations were carried out by US government operatives concerning the resignation of Pope Benedict or the conclave that elected Pope Francis?
– Did US government operatives have contact with the “Cardinal Danneels Mafia”?
– International monetary transactions with the Vatican were suspended during the last few days prior to the resignation of Pope Benedict. Were any U.S. Government agencies involved in this?
– Why were international monetary transactions resumed on February 12, 2013, the day after Benedict XVI announced his resignation? Was this pure coincidence?
– What actions, if any, were actually taken by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, and others tied to the Obama administration who were involved in the discussion proposing the fomenting of a “Catholic Spring”?
– What was the purpose and nature of the secret meeting between Vice President Joseph Biden and Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican on or about June 3, 2011?
– What roles were played by George Soros and other international financiers who may be currently residing in United States territory?”

The investigation the group of Catholic leaders is requesting of President Trump should be of interest to more than just Catholics. George Soros’s ability to co-opt leading political figures to assist his radical plans for nation states is well known; but his ability to force “regime change” in the Catholic church, an institution previously thought impenetrable from the outside, raises serious questions about his potential for global chaos. The investigation — and punishment — should begin at once.
WikiLeaks: Conservative Pope Benedict Was Forced To Resign By ‘Deep State’
Bring on their punishment!  To the gallows with you all.   tinyok
#2
I read through everything (even the links on the letter to the president) so don't think this is another Duckforcover "hit and run!"  tinylaughing tinylaughing

But I don't know about a deep state OP. I can see how and why people want to connect the dots but Benedict was going senile (and is on his death bed after progressively getting worse since then) so I don't think it's a grand conspiracy. 

Another thought, it's not like we can go in and install the "shah", if the college of cardinals select the new pope EVEN IF there was some plot to bring Benedict down, it's on the COC to put the new one in. If (and I mean IIIIFFFF) everything that preceded Francis becoming pope is as the article points out, Vatican City can only blame itself, they put him in power.
#3
(02-16-2018, 07:33 PM)DuckforcoveR Wrote: I read through everything (even the links on the letter to the president) so don't think this is another Duckforcover "hit and run!"  tinylaughing tinylaughing

But I don't know about a deep state OP. I can see how and why people want to connect the dots but Benedict was going senile (and is on his death bed after progressively getting worse since then) so I don't think it's a grand conspiracy. 

Another thought, it's not like we can go in and install the "shah", if the college of cardinals select the new pope EVEN IF there was some plot to bring Benedict down, it's on the COC to put the new one in. If (and I mean IIIIFFFF) everything that preceded Francis becoming pope is as the article points out, Vatican City can only blame itself, they put him in power.

I agree, no conspiracy involved with Benedict standing down, however I do believe that pope Francis was presented as a harmless old man, safe to be put in power, seems he is been used by TPTB to destroy the RC Church and pave the way for Islam to take over.
#4
@"DuckforcoveR"  and @"Wallfire" 
I agree with you both on this.

I had read about him going Senile also.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#5
(02-16-2018, 08:41 PM)guohua Wrote: @"DuckforcoveR"  and @"Wallfire" 
I agree with you both on this.

I had read about him going Senile also.

Probably, but there must have been something in the Wikileaks emails to make the argument for what the OP states.   minusculethinking
#6
I do however believe that John Paul 1 was killed to stop him making changes to the RC Church that would of made the Church a better and stronger Church and would of been able to stem the flood of Islam into Europe.
The Christian Church is been destroyed all over Europe and with it we are loosing Christian morals, and that gap is been filled with Islam. One has only to look at London to see what happens when Islamic morals are let take over, and look at Sweden.
Evil is working very hard in Europe at the moment, and the tool it is using is Islam.
BUT and i stress this point very much, Islam is not the same as muslim, most muslims are good people trapped by Islam. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_John_...y_theories
#7
(02-16-2018, 08:46 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote:
(02-16-2018, 08:41 PM)guohua Wrote: @"DuckforcoveR"  and @"Wallfire" 
I agree with you both on this.

I had read about him going Senile also.

Probably, but there must have been something in the Wikileaks emails to make the argument for what the OP states.   minusculethinking

I think the wikileaks email shows two people discussing what they would prefer to see happen in the church. And believe me, they aren’t alone. My mom (and her entire side) are catholic and they are very much opposed to this doctrine of birth control being forbidden. As was stated in that email (in a round about way)  many in the church think their positions on some things are outdated.

I guess it parallels to our political system in the states (right / left). There are massive fissures within and lines drawn in the sand. The “flock” themselves are very split on their ideals and their views of the direction of the church. So I don’t know, Podesta is a man that has his finger in many pies (not pizza pies lol), I think it’s safe to say (as with many other lobbyists and policy pushers on both sides) that it doesn’t seem out of the ordinary for him to discuss with a policy group their desire to see certain policies changed.
 
As I’ve said a few times, Podesta was hacked and exposed. But there are many on all sides that would be just as scrutinized if their gmail accounts got hacked for the world to see. There’s always a pendulum swinging and it’s only a matter of time.
 
On that subject, why do all of these schmucks use gmail?   tinylaughing tinylaughing


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)