Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What You May Not Know Regarding Obummer
#1
Wow People! I knew he wasn't what he claimed, but he's worse than I even thought!

Listen to this man tell what he learned about Barry from his half brother. 

#2
I'm merely postulating this theory and to some, it may seem ridiculous... but if I may.

What if it was decided to invade the United States with the intent of acquiring it's global power, it's finances
as they stand and the controlling it's population in a manner that the majority of that population would be
tolerant to? How would that be done?

If we agree that the no matter what, the current status-quo, the global perception and the relative peace
across the world, must be maintained at all costs, then how can such a powerful country be usurped?

My suggestion would be to take command of it's highest political position of power and to do that, the logistics
would staggering in their complexity. National Security would have to be subtly invaded with a belief-system that
was so close to current national axioms, that no 'blip' on anyone's radar would appear and any debate to hint that
some weird-sort of change could be mocked.

A favourable narrative would have be embedded into the media and a physical totem to represent that narrative
would have to be seen as to arrive through the usual means of political ladder-climbing. Any trace of countering
or revealing evidence would have to be carefully eliminated and any national social tendencies would have to be
leaned on.

If there's a 'skeleton-in-the-cupboard' of the preferred country of invasion, that embarrassment can be played on
to nationally shame -if the correct fictive can be forced. Opposing voices would have to be drowned out by using
this identity discrediting and at a moment's notice, any viable proof would have to disappear.

Total denial never works, so half-truths laced with mitigating information would have to be offered to feed anyone
who believes they see 'something' behind the wizard's curtain and since the common grease that makes the country
successful is money, there cannot be any penny-pinching to make the whole idea work.

Remember, prosperity doesn't come from worrying about how much it costs, but from how much it makes.

If you simply take over and become your powerful enemy, you have won with little collateral damage to the thing
you desire... it's power. But the one cost in all of this for it to work, would be time. At least four generations.

But what if you're a security agency and innocent of this suggested assault...? You discover the plot halfway through
and that certain ingrained laws have been broken, laws that once damaged, could be argued to be left as they are now.
Namely, a viable candidate for the US Presidency must be born in the US!

Do you tell the people or begrudgingly go along with it in order to keep the accepted status-quo?

Silly, nuh?

(I will now watch your video, Mystic!)
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#3
You're  exactly on point @"BIAD".  This was a long term plan set in motion long ago, infiltrating from within as soon as JFK was "taken out". 
They moved slowly and methodically so the public wouldn't notice.  Bush Sr. was a major player, and it's been going on heavily ever since he became POTUS.  I don't think Regan was much of a player, however, he had his faults in allowing certain things to take place.

Obummer was groomed for his position as POTUS. Prince al-Waleed bin Talal paid for his Harvard education, the CIA got his phony birth certificate, and he was then used as their puppet to install Muslim people into our government, disrupt our laws, and strengthen the gangs/mobs in Chicago, among other things .

Hillary was supposed to be the last puppet put into place for the final take down of America, but a miracle happened and she lost.  She lost a rigged election.  What does that tell you?   tinylaughing 


WE THE PEOPLE are fighting back and we WILL win and regain the glory and honor that we once held before these (censored) Satanists stepped in and tried to destroy us.

All of this will be revealed in documented evidence when the memo is released and other things are brought from the darkness into the light.

I can't wait!!   smallgreenbananadancer
#4
[Image: attachment.php?aid=3158]


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
#5
Quote:Podesta Emailed About an Assassination Three Days Before
Supreme Court Justice Scalia’s Suspicious Death.

'True Pundit personnel, who have served in varying intelligence capacities and agencies
for the United States, were floored this morning when combing the Wikileaks database
of John Podesta emails.

Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in a Feb. 9, 2016 email makes reference to
an assassination.

Using the term “wet work,” Podesta sent a cryptic email to Democratic strategist and
heavyweight consultant Steve Elmendorf. The term wet work is an intelligence slang
term with Russian roots.
Defined it means to assassinate a public figure, diplomat or someone of political note.

Elmendorf replied to Podesta’s mysterious reference:
“I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down”

We do not want to go down the conspiracy rabbit hole here based on one or two comments.
However, Podesta’s email was sent on a Tuesday. By Friday, Associate Justice of the Supreme
Court Antonin Scalia was found dead at a remote Texas resort.
To say Scalia’s death was suspicious is putting it mildly.

*No autopsy
*No medical examiner on site to decipher cause of death
*No U.S. Marshal protection detail accompanying Scalia
*No functioning CCTV cameras on day of death
*Scalia found clothed on bed with pillow over face
*Scalia’s body mysteriously cremated before it could be examined
*Resort owner large Obama contributor
*And the list goes on and on

We are not alleging Podesta or Elmendorf played a role in Scalia’s death.
That is a large leap and making such a leap is how news sites get a reputation for
spreading conspiracy theories. But neither are doing themselves any favors by
discussing the topic via email either.

And the timing cannot be ignored, even by partisan detectives.
Simply put: The optics look very bad.

When public officials and Beltway insiders, especially those working for Hillary Clinton,
start and correspond to an assassination-themed email thread, they open themselves up
wide for criticisms.

Likewise this is the definition of poor judgment by both parties, discussing anything related,
jokingly or not, to assassination. Podesta, after all, is running a campaign for the presidency
of the United States and therefore his communications are held to a higher standard.

And in a functioning Republic where law and order prevail, the FBI would want some answers
too to the questions were are posing here. Any competent investigator would, based on the
troubling timing alone. But, not Director James Comey’s FBI. Not this FBI.

Just a week ago it seemed likewise unbelievable that Clinton would seek to kill Wikileaks
Founder Julian Assange with a military drone per True Pundit. The main stream media quickly
labeled the meticulously-documented report as just another right-wing conspiracy ginned
up to boost Donald Trump.
Until Clinton said she couldn’t recall calling for Assange’s alleged assassination.

If Scalia was in fact murdered, it will remain a secret under this current regime and a subsequent
Clinton presidency. That’s not a conspiracy theory.

Here is a copy of the full email...'
SOURCE:
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#6
(01-28-2018, 05:19 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: ...Obummer was groomed for his position as POTUS. Prince al-Waleed bin Talal paid for his
Harvard education, the CIA got his phony birth certificate, and he was then used as their
puppet to install Muslim people into our government, disrupt our laws, and strengthen the
gangs/mobs in Chicago, among other things...

It's a slow change surrounded with valid reasons. Sexuality would be pushed in such a way
that when stricter social rules were demanded, the religious-right would see them as okay
and unknowingly aligning itself with it's foe.

Confusion in sexual identity can be debated in a way as to suggest that it's healthy to
to be more concerned how others 'feel' about you than one's own direction in life.

Even now, there's a constant barrage of sexual assaults on women, what better way to keep
them safe as to make sure they're segregated and possibly suggest they wear unappealing attire.
Women become objects to covet and protect, like valuable vessel... a vessel to help in populating
one's ideology.

Entertainment should be railed back to stop making the male's look masculine. If it's seen as the
norm to behave in a more-feminine manner, then it will easier to suppress them via physical force.

Violence must be quashed for no other reason as to let the population know it's 'bad' to resist
and if one allows one side more lee-way than another, this is also a capitulating tactic.

Any fatherly advice in being strong as a man and that primal instinct to protect one's family
must also be erased and so, infidelity must be encouraged and the basic family unit must be
mocked and seen as outdated.

The above are just a few of the things we're already aware of that have changed since the nineties
even and it's all done in the belief of the first-world, Coca-cola-advert-style of bringing peace to
the world!

But they say reality doesn't work like that.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)