Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
‘Accelerated Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’
#1
Here is another Credible encounter with UFO's from Very Credible Members of our Military.


Quote:2 Navy Airmen and an Object That ‘Accelerated Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’
Yes, I believe,,,,,,,, I Do,  smallwink
Quote:The following recounts an incident in 2004 that advocates of research into U.F.O.s have said is the kind of event worthy of more investigation, and that was studied by a Pentagon program that investigated U.F.O.s. Experts caution that earthly explanations often exist for such incidents, and that not knowing the explanation does not mean that the event has interstellar origins.

WASHINGTON — Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight were on a routine training mission 100 miles out into the Pacific when the radio in each of their F/A-18F Super Hornets crackled: An operations officer aboard the U.S.S. Princeton, a Navy cruiser, wanted to know if they were carrying weapons.


“Two CATM-9s,” Commander Fravor replied, referring to dummy missiles that could not be fired. He had not been expecting any hostile exchanges off the coast of San Diego that November afternoon in 2004.


Commander Fravor, in a recent interview with The New York Times, recalled what happened next. Some of it is captured in a video made public by officials with a Pentagon program that investigated U.F.O.s.


“Well, we’ve got a real-world vector for you,” the radio operator said, according to Commander Fravor. For two weeks, the operator said, the Princeton had been tracking mysterious aircraft. The objects appeared suddenly at 80,000 feet, and then hurtled toward the sea, eventually stopping at 20,000 feet and hovering. Then they either dropped out of radar range or shot straight back up.




The radio operator instructed Commander Fravor and Commander Slaight, who has given a similar account, to investigate.
The two fighter planes headed toward the objects.

The Princeton alerted them as they closed in, but when they arrived at “merge plot” with the object — naval aviation parlance for being so close that the Princeton could not tell which were the objects and which were the fighter jets — neither Commander Fravor nor Commander Slaight could see anything at first.
There was nothing on their radars, either.

Then, Commander Fravor looked down to the sea. It was calm that day, but the waves were breaking over something that was just below the surface.

Whatever it was, it was big enough to cause the sea to churn.


Hovering 50 feet above the churn was an aircraft of some kind — whitish — that was around 40 feet long and oval in shape. The craft was jumping around erratically, staying over the wave disturbance but not moving in any specific direction, Commander Fravor said.

The disturbance looked like frothy waves and foam, as if the water were boiling.


Quote:Commander Fravor began a circular descent to get a closer look, but as he got nearer the object began ascending toward him. It was almost as if it were coming to meet him halfway, he said.

Commander Fravor abandoned his slow circular descent and headed straight for the object.
But then the object peeled away. “It accelerated like nothing I’ve ever seen,” he said in the interview. He was, he said, “pretty weirded out.”
Source
smallawesome
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#2
2004?   Probably one of ours, but still, it shows the technology we have, and have had for decades.  Stingy bastards!   tinyok




Reply
#3
(Click on pic to play video)







Reply
#4
David Icke speaks about the interview in my previous post, and other things concerning ETs.




https://youtu.be/P7NvVcArK8g




Reply
#5
The guy who was incharge of the secret program speaks to CNN


Reply
#6
(12-23-2017, 02:01 PM)727Sky Wrote: The guy who was incharge of the secret program speaks to CNN


One of his answers is this "it's a lot, Lot More Than That."  
No Shit!!!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#7
Why does the video of the "craft" have SLAVE written on the film?    tinybighuh

Or, am I seeing it wrong?




Reply
#8
(12-23-2017, 05:15 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Why does the video of the "craft" have SLAVE written on the film?    tinybighuh

Or, am I seeing it wrong?

I think a pilot like 727Sky may be able answer that question.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#9
(12-23-2017, 09:12 PM)guohua Wrote:
(12-23-2017, 05:15 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Why does the video of the "craft" have SLAVE written on the film?    tinybighuh

Or, am I seeing it wrong?

I think a pilot like 727Sky may be able answer that question.

I have not used that type of FLIR before but I would bet the azimuth/target is slaved so the FLIR tracks the object as much as it can regardless of the aircraft's attitude.. That is usually what "Slaved" means .
Reply
#10
(12-24-2017, 08:19 AM)727Sky Wrote:
(12-23-2017, 09:12 PM)guohua Wrote:
(12-23-2017, 05:15 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: Why does the video of the "craft" have SLAVE written on the film?    tinybighuh

Or, am I seeing it wrong?

I think a pilot like 727Sky may be able answer that question.

I have not used that type of FLIR before but I would bet the azimuth/target is slaved so the FLIR tracks the object as much as it can regardless of the aircraft's attitude.. That is usually what "Slaved" means .
Mr.G.
Here,,, Hi @727Sky  I think you're right.
Like Slaving a second hard drive to your primary drive, when you went into your Bios setting it would say "Slave Drive".
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply
#11
Thanks for clearing that up guys.   minusculethumbsup




Reply
#12
Latest from Howe and Knapp...start at 10:30 mark


Reply
#13
I'm glad to see the UFO/UAP topic coming out to the public in a more serious manner, however, I still think the footage they shared is fake. 

I've seen many, and there's just something odd about this one.  Why does it not move from the center of the screen?  Good pilots if they were able to hold it in that position all that time.  tinysure
Besides that, the kind of language the guys in the aircraft were using didn't seem very "military" to me.




Reply
#14
Some stuff I had never heard before; Travis Walton





Reply
#15
Same story but toward the end of the video the shenanigans that were done and the cover-up. 


Reply
#16
As most of us who have been heavily researching the UFO topic for years thought, the footage shown in the film by the Tom DeLonge Group to disclose to the public was fake.   tinysure


Quote: Tom DeLonge's CIA and other intel advisors used a picture of a mylar party balloon from 2005 as if it was a genuine UFO, and raised over 2.2 million dollars in funding from the event featuring it.

There was widespread suspicion of this "mainstream-media-sanctioned disclosure" in the UFO community, and it was just proven correct.

Someone within the group obviously knew this was a fake image. We do not feel Tom DeLonge was in on it, and his silence suggests he must be very upset at this point.

With the formerly-invincible Cabal on the ropes like never before, perhaps this 'disclosure' was just too easy. No one was fighting and dying to make this happen, and the media towed the line.

The members of this group completely "ghosted" the UFO community at large, hardly granting any access whatsoever to the people on the front lines of the disclosure movement.

Weirdest of all was how little anyone in the public was affected by it.

UFOs? Been there, done that.

What will real disclosure look like now that the credibility of this operation has been shattered? It's going to be grassroots all the way.

This is a really long article, so click on the title at top to read in full.




Reply
#17
@Mystic Wanderer  Yup,,, I believe they would.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)