02-10-2019, 12:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-10-2019, 04:45 AM by Mystic Wanderer.)
Q is back! 
Post 2676: https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/?q=Scaramucci
Okay, Q told us to "Re_read drops re: 'Scaramucci' model."
Here they are in post 2468 from Nov. 10, 2018
And post 2654, Jan. 6, 2019
The next Q post is #2677 where he answers an ANon welcoming him back.
Time to return publicly?
He/they might be referring to the smear campaigns coming out in the media about Q again. I saw one the other day.
Makes no sense to attack someone for just helping the public think for themselves. [They] don't want the public to take Q seriously.
Give it a day and there will be decoders all over this in videos. I'll post one soon as I can.
ETA: Didn't take as long as I thought. I'm glad Katie G. posted first.
Post 2676: https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/?q=Scaramucci
Quote:Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4662eb No.5094276![[Image: fold.png]](https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/styles/img/fold.png)
Feb 9 2019 15:48:12 (EST)
Optics are important.
Stealth bombers silent?
Re_read Mueller re: 'designed to' drops.
Probe conclusion coming?
[-30]
Coincidence 'conclusion' occurring as new AG installed?
What is the purpose of WHITAKER?
Re_read drops re: 'Scaramucci' model.
Purpose?
Who did Scaramucci remove?
Effective?
Optics important?
What occurs post installed 'BLOCKADE' removal?
DECLAS?
[RR] 'complete' removal?
OIG release of findings?
How are they preparing to combat [narrative = vital]?
House intel launch of more 'FAKE' investigations in attempt to retain 'FALSE NARRATIVE' and claim 'POLITICAL ATTACK(S)' if investigated/prosecuted themselves?
[AS]?
[SDNY-AG]?
Attempts to retain 'BLOCKADE'?
Attempts to prevent public release of the TRUTH?
ZERO leaks re: HUBER?
ZERO.
Do not mistake 'public' silence for inaction.
"This is not another 4-year election."
Q
Okay, Q told us to "Re_read drops re: 'Scaramucci' model."
Here they are in post 2468 from Nov. 10, 2018
Quote:Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.443
Nov 10 2018 12:44:56 (EST)
The 'Scaramucci' Play
Temp hire to remove embedded 'untrustworthy' staffers?
>Spicer
>Priebus
Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted.
Think Whitaker.
[NEXT WEEK]
WH [optics] must remain stable.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/list-off...d=49334453
[Many] did not leave by choice.
[Save-Face] and promote MAGA or [be exposed].
LESS THAN 10.
Attacks occur from all directions.
Logical thinking.
Why attack a movement simply, by design, asking people to think for themselves?
CONTROL = POWER
Why are the biggest news co's in the world continuing to attack this movement?
WHY IS THE WASH POST LEADING THE ATTACKS?
WHY DO THE ATTACKS COME IN WAVES?
COORDINATED?
YOU ATTACK THOSE THE MOST WHO ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT.
[SWAMP] contains RED & BLUE.
Q
And post 2654, Jan. 6, 2019
Quote:Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 63a8f8 No.4628060
Jan 6 2019 13:06:00 (EST) https://www.axios.com/trump-acting-cabin...30aaf.html
Scaramucci model?
Public opinion (optics) do not matter.
Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted.
Q
The next Q post is #2677 where he answers an ANon welcoming him back.
Quote:New: Title TBD
2677
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 9 Feb 2019 - 3:52:03 PM
Quote:Anonymous 9 Feb 2019 - 3:49:07 PM
>>5094276
Welcome Back
>>5094289
We never left.
It's time to return publicly.
Q
Time to return publicly?
He/they might be referring to the smear campaigns coming out in the media about Q again. I saw one the other day.
Makes no sense to attack someone for just helping the public think for themselves. [They] don't want the public to take Q seriously.
Give it a day and there will be decoders all over this in videos. I'll post one soon as I can.
ETA: Didn't take as long as I thought. I'm glad Katie G. posted first.