Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case
#1
OK, do I have your Attention? tinybiggrin
Now for the entire Title,,,,,,,
Quote:Senate Judiciary opens probe into Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case
minusculegoodjob
That's just the tip of the iceberg, I'm Thinking.
Quote:The Senate Judiciary Committee has launched a probe into a Russian nuclear bribery case, demanding several federal agencies disclose whether they knew the FBI had uncovered the corruption before the Obama administration in 2010 approved a controversial uranium deal with Moscow.

 
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the committee chairman, on Wednesday raised the issue in public during questioning of Attorney General Jeff Sessions during an oversight hearing.
 
The senator cited a series of The Hill stories that showed the FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear officials were involved in a racketeering scheme as early as 2009, well before the uranium deal was approved.
 
"According to government documents and recent news reports, the Justice Department had an ongoing criminal investigation for bribery, extortion, money laundering, into officials for a Russian company making purchase of Uranium One," Grassley said. "That purchase was approved during previous administration and resulted in Russians owning 20 percent of America's uranium mining capacity.
 
"What are you doing to find out how Russian takeover of American uranium was allowed to occur despite criminal conduct by Russian company that the Obama administration approved to make the purchase?" he asked Sessions.
 
Sessions responded: "I would offer that some people have gone to jail in that transaction already, but the article talks about other issues. Without confirming or denying existence of any particular investigation, I would say I hear your concerns and they will be reviewed."
Some People,,,,, Some people have gone to Jail,,,,, But have the REAL Players?
Let us read on, OK?
Quote:The committee is discussing other bipartisan requests to make in the coming days, and Grassley also is expected to seek access to potential witnesses soon, escalating from the information requests he made a few years back, according to people familiar with the investigation.

The senator also specifically conveyed in recent letters he no longer accepts the Obama administration's assurances from 2015 that there was no basis to block the Uranium One deal.

"I am not convinced by these assurances," Grassley wrote the Homeland Security Department last week. "The sale of Uranium One resulted in a Russian government takeover of a significant portion of U.S. uranium mining capacity. In light of that fact, very serious questions remain about the basis for the finding that this transaction did not threaten to impair U.S. national security."

 
Though Wednesday's hearing was scheduled for other purposes, aides said they expected Grassley to ask Sessions questions about a story published in The Hill on Tuesday that disclosed the FBI had uncovered evidence showing Russian nuclear officials were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving bribes, kickbacks and money laundering designed to expand Russian President Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business on U.S. soil.
Really, Really, You actually BELIEVED Obama,,, That Was Stupid!!!
BUT! You do have Redeeming Qualities. Why,,,, everyone asks?
Quote:The evidence was first gathered in 2009 and 2010, but Department of Justice officials waited until 2014 to bring any charges.
In between that time, President Obama's multi-agency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) gave approval to Russia's Rosatom to buy a Canadian mining company called Uranium One that controlled 20 percent of America's uranium deposits.


 
The committee's members at the time included former Attorney General Eric Holder and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose husband, former President Bill Clinton, collected large speech fees and millions in charitable donations from Russia and other entities interested in the outcome of the decision.
 
Grassley dispatched letters last week to all the federal agencies whose executives served on the CFIUS when the decision was made, demanding to know whether they were aware of the FBI case before they voted.
 
He also questioned whether the documented corruption that was uncovered posed a national security threat that should have voided approval of the uranium deal.
So, now would you like to read more? Source
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#2
Quote:The evidence was first gathered in 2009 and 2010, but Department of Justice officials waited until 2014 to bring any charges.

Typical gooberment! 
They are just now getting around to REALLY looking at this, and charges were brought up in 2014?!   mediumfacepalm

Do your freakin' job and put those (censored) under the jail already!!   smallfit
#3
Do your freakin' job and put those (censored) under the jail already!!   [Image: Smallfit.gif]

Somehow I dont think that is ever going to happen   minusculechairshot
#4

https://youtu.be/Qx1I2iTUxiU


Mueller is stepping down!   smallgreenbananadancer


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)