The M S M will never report this.

[guohua]

This article will never see the Light of day by the Main Stream Media.
They'll ignore it and no one will comment or report it.

Nothing that could be Negative about the Obama Administration can ever be reported.
But if this was a Negative report on the Trump Family or Administration, they'll be all over it Like Flies and Shit!

The article is just to much to copy and past, it would lose some of it's meaning I think.
It's important that you read it and if someone would bring this article out on our Social Media please.
Liberals need to know the Truth!
Who Really Violated Our Privacy Act Laws and Why and For What Reason.
Who Spoon Fed Trump Campaign workers  and other Civilian Names To The M S M.

How Team Obama tried to hack the election

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic-spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

Source

They Hate The Truth.

[BIAD]

Well, it's just that it disturbs the accepted dichotomy and if discussed, might reveal the true persuasion of
a political party.

It was laid out in a simple form that Donald Trump represented all that is bad about current-day America.
Wealth, the 'old-boy-network' -with an emphasis on the gender part of that title, a lack of concern for those
who fail to achieve and a disdain for anyone who dosn't appreciate traditional values of that country.
Trump is portrayed as a bully with an ignorance for nuance and fair-play.

Hillary is not only a woman and ergo, innocent of the accepted crimes that business, finance and corrupt
political horse trade that men always mingle in to gain personal power, she also represents the 'mother'...
the caring, loving human that someone who isn't as strong, can run to.

Barack Obama is the oppressed black man, a man who's thwarted the evil white establishment and rose
to power with the assistance of those who also struggle beneath those mainly-men that are brash and walk
the land with a confident swagger.
Black hat, white hat and there's the irony.

In the cartoon-world of mainstream media, the masses have to pick a way of life and it has to be the one
that certain political and controlling factions require. The same news forums treat each 'side' in a way that
is simple and easy to understand, because that's how the media perceive their customers.

People go to the same websites, watch the same televsion programmes and read the same newspapers
because it reinforces their belief-system. Trump is evil, Russia is evil and so they must be connected.

Oddly enough, terrorism has never been tied to the Trump wagon and really, a neutral would find that odd.
But we'll get back to that.
Trump's background smacks of wealth and a privileged rearing, so the general impression is that he has
never failed and doesn't know what it 'feels' like.

Hillary and Barack want peace and love. Any misogynistic and racial guilt is diffused, a message is offered
to those who struggle to grasp confidence -namely the young and seemed to promise a world where danger
will become a forgotten word.

It's gone on since the media realised ratings can be gathered from displaying such a simplistic format of
politics. Peter Pan and Wendy versus the evil Captain Hook!
And the group that holds the pen will always write the story they want.

If the same mainstream media were invited to play 'The Truth Game' I would dare to suggest that one of
the main concerns that their customers have... a concern that rarely effects them at this point but has the
potential to do so, is terrorism.

If the tale is written to imply a non-coloured-skinned, affluent, cruel-for-cruel's-sake group of males were
wanting to invade western society because of a particular goal, the patriotism evoked would stamp it out
and we'd move on to continue our wonderment of a Kardashian buttock.
9/11 proved that.

But these killers and suicide-bombers are from a perceived poor country and constantly talk about religious
worship. A poor country is like the weak kid in a schoolyard fearing the bully and for many of young, they could
feel an affinity.

They state their ideology is about peace and the extreme version demands that to sustain this peace,
anyone who doesn't follow the religion must be destroyed. Okay, let's ignore the 'destroyed'-bit... that's a
bit triggering. But the peace-thing is good as it implies no physical harm... sort of.

Well... maybe this violent behavior could be stamped out, there's always someone who doesn't grasp the
'kumbaya' aspect and the forced head-coverings can be dealt with later. Maybe we can call a hijab and a
burqa a fashion-item and ignore the oppression attitude?

Except there's a problem that goes against the cartoonish narrative. Since the media enjoy showing fleeing
families and children in their stories -and the wars are always started by men from those countries, we run
head-long into a predicament that can dilutes the rage the media wished to pour onto their assumed 'Black
Hat'. The media have always portrayed Muslims as non-white and our Peter Pan, Mr. Obama isn't white either.
Damn!

And that's why the increase in terrorism couldn't be blamed on Trump because it would automatically neutralise
the race-card and in the United States, certain political strategists knew that this was important. Terrorists from
another country can't vote and it was the votes that Hillary and Obama wanted.
That's why at-the-time-President Obama said unto his Mexican children "If you're here, just vote"

What's Black is White and vice versa, the account of St. Jerome's wanderings in the Vatican's catacombs go
a long way to describe how today's readers and viewers of mainstream media should 'feel'.

[DuckforcoveR]

I can't trust a damn thing that comes out of Rupert Murdoch's mouth. Not to say it's all biased just because he said it (actually yes, i'm saying that) but the validity of the NY Post to prove a point on the right is like me quoting Saul Alinsky...it would get chewed up and spit out. 

Garbage "news" if you ask me. MSM is designed to fool and inundate the masses (not the individuals) and NY Post is another shining example of that. 

Planet X is coming next month! (last year...)

But hey, if you want to blast the evil "MSM" in an article sourced at the NYPOST (!) then have at it. There are some good things there, like:

10 best sex scenes in movies that showed REAL SEX

Paris Hilton making out with her boyfriend

ok, vomit is creeping up, back to the meat of the story:


Long story short (in my eyes) this isn't an "Obama Problem". This is a Patriot Act Problem. This is a surveillance act problem. This is a NDAA problem. WE GAVE the government the power to do this when we bowed to their will after 9/11 and just stood by shaking and scared while they passed the original Patriot Act. The ONLY SENATOR to vote no back then was my guy from Wisconsin. One of those "career politicians" who fought tooth and nail to get people to understand exactly WHAT they were allowing to happen. 

So I hate to say I told you so, but...

“But under this bill, the government can compel the disclosure of the personal records of anyone — perhaps someone who worked with, or lived next door to, or went to school with, or sat on an airplane with, or has been seen in the company of, or whose phone number was called by — the target of the investigation.

And under this new provisions all business records can be compelled, including those containing sensitive personal information like medical records from hospitals or doctors, or educational records, or records of what books someone has taken out of the library. This is an enormous expansion of authority, under a law that provides only minimal judicial supervision.”
[…]
We must grant law enforcement the tools that it needs to stop this terrible threat. But we must give them only those extraordinary tools that they need and that relate specifically to the task at hand.

Basically, we shouldn't be surprised. If you leave your wallet at the park overnight (in this case, almost 17 years) and when your return there is money missing, who's really at fault?

Feingold on the Patriot Act

[guohua]

@"DuckforcoveR" Excellent Point, very well said.
Thank you for your Opinion.

[BIAD]

I can't trust a damn thing that comes out of Rupert Murdoch's mouth. Not to say it's all biased
just because he said it (actually yes, i'm saying that) but the validity of the NY Post to prove a
point on the right is like me quoting Saul Alinsky...it would get chewed up and spit out. 

Garbage "news" if you ask me. MSM is designed to fool and inundate the masses
(not the individuals) and NY Post is another shining example of that...

 I can't agree with you more and that's why they're the laughing-stock around the world.

 Poll: Majority of Americans Think Mainstream Media Publishes 'Fake News'.

'Nearly two-thirds of Americans think the mainstream press is full of "fake news,"
according to the latest Harvard-Harris poll.



65 percent of voters believe there is a significant amount of fake news in the
mainstream media, and the sentiment is held by a majority of voters across
the ideological spectrum.

80 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents and 53 percent of
Democrats reflected this distrust of the media.
84 percent of voters said it is hard to know what news to believe online.

The Harvard-Harris online survey of 2,006 registered voters was conducted
between May 17 and May 20.

On "The Fox News Specialists," Eric Bolling said the media had a particularly
bad week last week, with The Washington Post and The New York Times
publishing negative stories about President Trump that proved to be "duds."...'
SOURCE:

[guohua]

@"BIAD"  Now that is some good research, That is a very informative article.


But everyone knows what I'll say, Those 65% that believes the MSM is all about Fake News are Trump Supporters and The Brainless Zombies that make up the 35% are Just That Brainless! 
Yes, They Watch and Worship The Puppets.

[BIAD]

...But everyone knows what I'll say, Those 65% that believes the MSM is all about Fake News
are Trump Supporters and The Brainless Zombies that make up the 35% are Just That
Brainless!

All I know is that if that 65% are just Trump supporters, it goes a long way to show how
Donald Trump got elected in the first place! It's irrelevant that the anti-Trump narrative of
the MSM is doing, it's just not working and explains their poor ratings.

The election polls for instance, how could they be so wrong...? seriously.
Did nobody doubt the figures? Was it a case of the numbers bearing out what the MSM
wanted to hear and therefore, never checking and re-checking like a neutral news-outlet
would do?

No. The mainstream media had ignored the one group it's supposed to be in business for
and believed it could convince by repetition and favourable, biased articles that their chosen
party was the one that would win.

The only thing that astounds me is that they still believe that they will come out of this
narrative war with some credibility! Attempting to shut down alternative voices by convincing
advertisers to steer clear of them shows once more, how desperate they've become and I'll
wager this latest trick isn't a new one from their bag.

If Donald Trump had never been in politics before, then how could he be judged on whether
he'd do a good job or not? That would be a question from a neutral person. But for reasons
that will one day to come to light, the mainstream media -and that is people who have families,
mortgages and friends of all persuasions, have deliberately focused on defying their own
President.

When this cloud of hate and mud-slinging lifts, someone is going to have to explain why it's
happened and I doubt the masses will accept it.

[guohua]

@"BIAD"  True!
All the Democrats Whine and Cry that Hillary won the Popular Vote by California alone.
They fail to mention that California Governor (Shit) Brown pass a law in California the Gave illegals the right to Vote in State Elections.
But not the Presidential Election,,,,,, But Who,,, Yes WHO in their Right Mind Thinks illegals didn't vote in the Presidential Election.
Only Democrats believe they didn't abuse the law and Not Vote. 
Yes the Same Brain Dead Idiots the Believe a Criminal Obeys Gun free Zone Signs!
    Have I made My point? Stupid, Gullible People Die First and By large Numbers.
because they believe that The M S M and Career Politicians, Care About Them and their Health and Welfare.

[DuckforcoveR]

The reason people question Trump and the "from the outside" narrative is because he's a billionaire who spent his inherited life paying off politicians. You cant drain the swamp when your entire life has been paying immigrants to turn your swamps into golf courses...

I stand by my thought for the last 2 years: America was RIPE for change. We just picked the wrong orangutan to deliver. Trump will deliver change on the same silver platter he grew up with? Wishful thinking at best...

[1984hasarrived]

The reason people question Trump and the "from the outside" narrative is because he's a billionaire who spent his inherited life paying off politicians. You cant drain the swamp when your entire life has been paying immigrants to turn your swamps into golf courses...

I stand by my thought for the last 2 years: America was RIPE for change. We just picked the wrong orangutan to deliver. Trump will deliver change on the same silver platter he grew up with? Wishful thinking at best...

Having "drained the swamp" he has restocked it with family and fellow billionaires, from business backgrounds.  If Trump supporters feel that these billionaires represent them, and are looking out for their interests, then there is nothing really to say.

These people are just out to make themselves richer, off the average Joe.

[BIAD]

The reason people question Trump and the "from the outside" narrative is because he's a billionaire who spent his inherited life paying off politicians. You cant drain the swamp when your entire life has been paying immigrants to turn your swamps into golf courses...

I stand by my thought for the last 2 years: America was RIPE for change. We just picked the wrong orangutan to deliver. Trump will deliver change on the same silver platter he grew up with? Wishful thinking at best...

If there were any influence performed by Russian agencies, I agree with you -DFC that the USA is
an ideal country to be plundered in this manner. The noble concept of a strong leader who doesn't
wish to stuff their pockets with money seems forgotten these days and to be candid, I'm not confident
such a person ever existed.

The public in many western countries have become 'soft' and tend to perceive their world through the
kaleidoscope of the internet. If we're not careful, it could mean our downfall.

I think Daitengu and Ninurta's view of our current societies are more attuned to reality than most.

[BIAD]

I don't suppose the MSM will ever report this either...!
It's a bit old and it's the first time I've come across it.

Washington Post owner receives $600 million contract from the CIA.

'Editor’s note: The Washington Post was the first to run the story of the CIA’s claim that
Russia hacked the US election, of which there is absolutely no evidence.

It’s been a rough couple days for The Washington Post. Word emerged that hackers
invaded its internal system—for a few days, no less—all of its staffers had to change 
heir passwords as the company tried to figure out how much data had been compromised.

Meanwhile, a petition campaign was launched related to news that Amazon, under the
Post’s new owner, Jeff Bezos, recently secured a $600 million contract from the CIA.

That’s at least twice what Bezos paid for the Post this year. Bezos recently disclosed that
the company’s Web-services business is building a “private cloud” for the CIA to use for
its data needs.


Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post.

Critics charge that, at a minimum, the Post needs to disclose its CIA link whenever it reports
on the agency. Over 15,000 have signed the petition this week hosted by RootsAction.

In a statement released by the Institute for Public Accuracy, media writer/author Robert
McChesney observes:

When the main shareholder in one of the very largest corporations in the world benefits
from a massive contract with the CIA on the one hand, and that same billionaire owns the
Washington Post on the other hand, there are serious problems.

The Post is unquestionably the political paper of record in the United States, and how it
covers governance sets the agenda for the balance of the news media. Citizens need
to know about this conflict of interest in the columns of the Post itself.

If some official enemy of the United States had a comparable situation—say the owner of
the dominant newspaper in Caracas was getting $600 million in secretive contracts from
the Maduro government—the Post itself would lead the howling chorus impaling that
newspaper and that government for making a mockery of a free press.
It is time for the Post to take a dose of its own medicine.”

See article by Norman Solomon for a fuller accounting. He notes:

Bezos personally and publicly touts Amazon Web Services, and it’s evident that Amazon will
be seeking more CIA contracts. Last month, Amazon issued a statement saying, “We look
forward to a successful relationship with the CIA.”...'
SOURCE:

[Mystic Wanderer]

Washington Post owner receives $600 million contract from the CIA.





Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post.

He definitely looks like he's being controlled by something; look at those eyes!  

[BIAD]

He definitely looks like he's being controlled by something; look at those eyes!  

They're among us...! But I must admit, he does look creepy.

[BIAD]

...But they'll do this to keep the masses blue-pilled.
(Notice the guy  in the white t-shirt. One of the comments of this video points
out that he's a media person that's used to centre the footage for the cameras
and then hides his face when the recording begins)



Also, that tape is there to make sure the public understand the area is cordoned off and yet,
to promote the ideas of unity, diversity and roll-over-and-take-my-religion-in-the-ass, the
backdrop of Muslims is allowed to be placed there rather than moving the cameras back.

I wasn't sure at first, but the same chap in the white t-shirt actually has a bundle of signs
which hints that this isn't just a spontaneous act.

There's a voice before the CNN Reporter begins to explain to her viewers about the situation
that says "excuse me... excuse me" and waves a hand.

That's either the BBC crew or Sky News and I think it's done to keep the young women out
of the shot because of a possible confusing concept that could be created due to the fact that
these two major outlets have been reporting from this location for a couple of mornings since
the killings and the impression they have to maintain is that the area is cordoned off to the public.

CNN don't have such worries, but it is disconcerting that the surrounding medias don't
comment on the false set-up, although I think the guy nearest the camera-phone does say:
'Embarrassing'!!

[guohua]

@"BIAD" Excellent video, It's was setup for the Dumb Down Gullible Masses!
The guy in the white t-shirt did look like the center piece.
More about CNN's Fake News.

Antro also notes that white police officers walked out of the scene and were replaced with Asian officers:

18h
Mark @markantro
CNN also timed this, BBC wanted to film it when they were on air, were having non of it

[/url]

 Follow
Mark @markantro
Note the white police officers leaving before the CNN shot & the Asian officers coming in. They then left after they went off air!
10:56 AM - 4 Jun 2017

According to a British viewer, BBC News also used this staged photo-op:
 

14h
Katie Hopkins 

✔ @KTHopkins
Did anyone see a clip of this on @BBCNews. Please email program details katie@katiehopkins.co.uk I will follow up pic.twitter.com/rdRbQzbqgy

 Follow
Donald @DonOftheDead80
@KTHopkins @BBCNews It was on the BBC1 News just before the Manchester concert, I took a pic as I couldn't believe it. Hope that helps. pic.twitter.com/rJLUZfUWXZ
3:15 PM - 4 Jun 2017
[img=675x0]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBgoBUmXoAA0-D4.jpg[/img]

• 
  
   
  
• 
   466466 Retweets
   
  
• 
   728728 likes
  

English newspaper columnist for the Daily Mail, Katie Hopkins chimed in as well saying, “Please watch. You are being deceived.”

 

 Follow
Katie Hopkins 

✔@KTHopkins
Please watch. You are being deceived. https://twitter.com/markantro/status/871419204846669825 …
3:03 PM - 4 Jun 2017

[url=https://twitter.com/KTHopkins] Follow
Katie Hopkins 

✔@KTHopkins
Same group. Multiple locations. Any more screen shots? Spot the pink trousers. Were this group for hire? #FakeNews

 Link

[BIAD]

Since it's illegal to impersonate (by falsely implying one is a law enforcement officer) a Policeman
in most -if not all countries, the two dark-skinned Officers must be real ones.

That means, the two-white Policemen were replaced by two coloured Officers with all having the
knowledge that no breach in their tasks were being threatened. Ergo, London Metropolitan Police
Force and CNN had agreed on the temporary switch-out of Officers for particular publicity reasons.

Which is worrying.

As far as the other two media outlets that I mentioned -are concerned, the BBC are terrible with their
state-driven narrative, especially in the morning. They're totally unaware of the public's opinion of the
BBC's stupid manner with their 'location-implies' tactic.

6.30am in the morning, a political story to recount and there on a grassy area beside the Houses of
Parliament, a young suited man stands and tells the early-morning viewer what the politicians think!
No politicians there... they're still in bed, but there's the visual narrative thanks to the publicly-funded
British Broadcasting Company.

Sky News is a bit more subtle, but the visual stuff is still used. It's formulaic and established based on
their accepted view on their dumbed-down audience. Sky bring in pompous middle-class young Journalists
to get their message across believing the age factor will work to catch young viewers.
(Which is doubtful!)


But just like a foot race, CNN are the Usain Bolt of Fake News!!