Quote:Linda Sarsour, one of the organizers behind Saturday’s Women’s March, being held in Washington, D.C., was recently spotted at a large Muslim convention in Chicago posing for pictures with an accused financier for Hamas, the terrorist group.
Sarsour, the head of the Arab American Association of New York and an Obama White House “Champion of Change,” was speaking at last month’s 15th annual convention of the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of North America.
While there, she posed for a picture with Salah Sarsour, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged work for the terrorist group.
[url=http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/figrues-organizer-dc-womens-march-linda-sarsour-pro-sharia-law-ties-hamas/]Linda Sarsour is very active on Twitter. She is pro Sharia law and a couple of her tweets even have a seditious tone to them where she romanticizes Sharia law and hints at it taking over America whereby we would have interest free loans.
That Gateway link you kindly provided makes me wonder what the hell women of the
US and UK are thinking about when you see how Sharia Law benefits women.
Linda Sarsour, one of the March's leaders, is a poster-child for these...erm, disciplines.
Forgive me that the list has been posted elsewhere on the site, but here's the 'rules'
in Sharia Law that specifically involve women. (Although there may be others)
'...Of all legal systems in the world today, Sharia law is the most intrusive and restrictive, especially against women.
According to Sharia law:
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (Muhammad's words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.' SOURCE:
Yeah, Donald Trump has his failings, but... really?!
Of course it's one's choice if a person wishes to cleave to these 'rules' in a country that doesn't
force them upon it's citizens, but I think those who were marching should really take a look at
who the organisers are and what their real agendas involve.
01-22-2017, 01:10 PM (This post was last modified: 01-22-2017, 01:11 PM by Daitengu.)
(01-22-2017, 11:54 AM)BIAD Wrote: That Gateway link you kindly provided makes me wonder what the hell women of the
US and UK are thinking about when you see how Sharia Law benefits women.
Linda Sarsour, one of the March's leaders, is a poster-child for these...erm, disciplines.
Forgive me that the list has been posted elsewhere on the site, but here's the 'rules'
in Sharia Law that specifically involve women. (Although there may be others)
'...Of all legal systems in the world today, Sharia law is the most intrusive and restrictive, especially against women.
According to Sharia law:
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (Muhammad's words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.' SOURCE:
Yeah, Donald Trump has his failings, but... really?!
Of course it's one's choice if a person wishes to cleave to these 'rules' in a country that doesn't
force them upon it's citizens, but I think those who were marching should really take a look at
who the organisers are and what their real agendas involve.
That would require them to actually think ...... which would cause them a massive headache from using that little known thing called a brain ......
Better to reign in hell ....
than serve in heaven .....
Wait hold the press !!!! Think about this for just a moment !!!! In only one day Trump got more fat women walking than Michelle did in 8 years!!!!!!! Golly Gee whiz that should be the lead story at CNN !!
Can I have a small percentage of the advertising revenue ?
Never mind I want nothing from the Communist News Network !
If the General Public Actually Knew The True Amount Of Muslim Influence in Obama's Administration and Hillary's Campaign and Support Staff, they'd be Shocked.
This also proves just how easy it is to Manipulate The Spoiled Weak Minded. The People Who Feel they Are Entitled To Win JUST Because They've Never Had To Really Accept The Fact, Not Everyone Agrees With Them. Not Everyone Has To Agree or Even Like Their Way Of Thinking.
The Instigators well do anything to Further Their Agendas and Disrupt Our Election Process.
The MSM keeps showing picture of a low turn out for Trumps Inauguration compared to Obama's to try and prove less people supported Trump.
Put what they fail to report is that Trumps Inauguration was on a Friday where as Obama's and B. Clintons was on the Weekend.
Well, SHIT, Most Of Trump Supporters Have JOB'S! Where as Obama's Didn't or Don't Now!
Tell That To The Snowflakes out there in the Social Media World!
Rant Ended,,,,,,,,, Sorry.
01-29-2017, 12:26 PM (This post was last modified: 01-29-2017, 12:31 PM by BIAD.)
(01-28-2017, 02:44 PM)guohua Wrote: ...But what they fail to report is that Trumps Inauguration was on a Friday where as Obama's and
B. Clinton's was on the Weekend.
Well, SHIT, Most Of Trump Supporters Have JOB'S! Where as Obama's Didn't or Don't Now!
That's an important point that gets overlooked. When one stands back from the MSM Insult-Fest,
and look on the whole election, inauguration and Trump's administration's current decision-making,
the mainstream media haven't really adjusted to the accusations of journalistic bias.
But why...? Do they truly believe that a Presidential removal can take place in the USA that stems
from their constant negativity?!
If we believe that individual reporters are not involved in any conspiratorial agenda that directly involves
George Soros passing 'anti-Trump flavoured' articles to them and the reporting is mere fallout of 'going
-along-to-get-along' journalism that's required because of the struggle for ratings in a 24-hour news
world, then what could this be really be all about?
Personally, I think that the regular news outlets have been peddling trash and click-bait non-stories for
so long that a serious, fair-handed political piece is beyond them and they wish to continue in the puerile
'His-crowd-was-bigger-than-your-crowd' mentality for the simple reason is it's the general failure in
first-world Journalistic ethics.
Add to that, that with the many 'soft' University courses that smack of diversity and liberalism, there
are many would-be Journalists who've never understood their serious role and just see it as another
form of 'Twitter' where their opinions can be aired because of their personal belief-design.
The structure of 'the fourth estate' has changed radically due to the internet, but I also think that
broadcasting information -overall, has become a vehicle for more-personal opinions that are deliberately
shrouded within the format of the writings.
If a Reporter doesn't agree with a general view of a subject that they wish promoted positively, then a
narrative can be designed to 'convert' the reader over a number of articles that offer a reasonable -but
slanted, alternative.
It could well be that these Journalists have bowed to their media company's desires due to political
pressure being applied in the boardroom, but if true, I would suggest that it's done with only a mild
grudge.
Which in itself, his worth reporting!
Whether President Trump is correct or not about the mainstream media's treatment of his actions, I think
that what's really galling them is that he's demanding a higher conduct that they haven't aspired to since
the beginning of globalisation.
They've had their own way for a very long time and now that they've been 'outed'... they don't like it!
Quote:I used to not get it, but recently the light bulb came on......very brightly. The reason the "Walking Dead" shows were so popular.......they are amongst us.
A sign held at the Women’s March on Washington, D.C., on January 21, 2017: The sign said (just incase it does not post) said, Women will one day have the same rights as guns... OK If women have the same rights as guns, the woman holding that sign will be:
Banned from all federal buildings, including post offices.
Banned from all banks.
Banned from schools.
Banned from most restaurants and shopping.
Banned from flying.
Banned from Chicago, New York City, Washington, D.C., and many other cities.
If she’s short or quiet, there is a $200 ($5 for oddities) tax stamp, fingerprint cards, passport photos, and a federal background check.
Some states will require her to travel in the trunk.
Some states will outright ban her if she looks scary or has certain “features.”
Some states require her to be locked in a safe at home or not in use.
Some states controls how much food she can have.
California requires a background check whenever food is bought for her.
She can be bought and sold, with an FBI background check and waiting period.
She will be demonized and attacked for being who she is.
There will be unceasing outcries to outright ban her.
02-11-2017, 10:16 AM (This post was last modified: 02-11-2017, 10:16 AM by BIAD.)
(02-11-2017, 06:23 AM)727Sky Wrote:
Quote:I used to not get it, but recently the light bulb came on......very brightly.
The reason the "Walking Dead" shows were so popular.......they are amongst us.
A sign held at the Women’s March on Washington, D.C., on January 21, 2017:
The sign said (just in case it does not post) said, Women will one day have the same rights as guns... OK
If women have the same rights as guns, the woman holding that sign will be:
Banned from all federal buildings, including post offices.
Banned from all banks.
Banned from schools.
Banned from most restaurants and shopping.
Banned from flying.
Banned from Chicago, New York City, Washington, D.C., and many other cities.
If she’s short or quiet, there is a $200 ($5 for oddities) tax stamp, fingerprint cards, passport photos, and a federal background check.
Some states will require her to travel in the trunk.
Some states will outright ban her if she looks scary or has certain “features.”
Some states require her to be locked in a safe at home or not in use.
Some states controls how much food she can have.
California requires a background check whenever food is bought for her.
She can be bought and sold, with an FBI background check and waiting period.
She will be demonized and attacked for being who she is.
There will be unceasing outcries to outright ban her.
I would suggest that for many, research involves the expression 'a self-gratifying acquisition of information'
There are many views that can be bent to suit one's opinion, but that doesn't make them sensible and
generally compatible to a willing ear.
The sign's shock-value is meant to drive the meaning through because in my opinion, we all tend to
live in the 'Now'!!
![[Image: download?mid=2%5f0%5f0%5f1%5f1%5fAHDsw0M...UwMDEuanBn]](https://i1.wp.com/fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/women-have-same-rights-as-guns.jpg?ssl=1)