Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HILLARY CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS
#1
Come-On you all knew this was coming!  tinyok Don't act shocked  tinysure
Hillary is going for a recount of States she sure should have Voted For Her, Remember she was Promised The Presidency.

Quote:Clinton Recount Plan Draws Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump
She is a Sore Loser, Hillary, GO AWAY!!!
Quote:Hillary Clinton’s campaign will participate in vote recounts of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan if they take place, drawing a rebuke from Donald Trump’s team that the Democrat is being a “sore loser” and part of a “ridiculous” effort.
If Green Party candidate Jill Stein initiates recounts in those states as she intends, the Clinton campaign “will participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides,” Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias said Saturday in a post on the blogging website Medium.com. He added that he doesn’t expect the action to overturn Trumps election.
Trump focused on Stein, not Clinton, in a response. “The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future,”’ he said in a statement.

Kellyanne Conway, who was Trump’s campaign manager and is now a senior adviser, was less conciliatory. “What a pack of sore losers,” she said in a statement. “After asking Mr. Trump and his team a million times on the trail, ‘Will HE accept the election results?’ it turns out Team Hillary and their new BFF Jill Stein can’t accept reality.”
“Rather than adhere to the tradition of graciously conceding and wishing the winner well, they’ve opted to waste millions of dollars and dismiss the democratic process. The people have spoken. Time to listen up. #YesYourPresident,” Conway said.
Source
I wish that the recount would prove Hillary to have lost by an even Wider margin!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#2
Just Start the civil war already ....... enough of this bullshit by damn clinton and the fucking leftist commie scum ......  end it once and for all ......
Better to reign in hell ....
  than serve in heaven .....



#3
Liberal progressives are not that Smart and Hillary Has A very Low IQ from the reports I've read.
[Image: 04732c2393ad0badf2a616df585e5ed3.jpg] [Image: c2d503483fbcf37d6d3e7989a96ba77b.jpg]
[Image: 5c148a33ddf8f6a13d25147915319c38.jpg] [Image: a3061a38b95707e3780904718b61bdf0.jpg]
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#4
Good video and he's correct.

Beside Ya?
[Image: maga_large.jpg]
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#5
 Proof Trump Won Popular Vote / Dems Trying To Overturn Election
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#6
I just can't help myself, Liberals are just so STUPID!
Here's some Proof!
[Image: 7f107798d50f4c745a88f2ef33c5d0a7.jpg] [Image: b43f4d01b92284c88d03b57b54545b53.jpg]v[Image: 15e6da857968b8562394a95f59708da7.jpg] And they're Screaming For A Recount, For HER!
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#7
The laughable thing here is that do they really think that an entrenched system
of electing a leader of a first-world country AND a superpower, has not been checked,
re-checked, bits bolted on, dubious parts stripped off and generally formed so that
something so simple as vote-counting can have an alternative outcome?!!

What are they looking for...? If it was rigged in Trump's or Hillary's favour, then do they
honestly think that the same media who favoured the Clinton camp will be allowed to
announce to the world that the United States, the head of the capitalist belief and a standard
across the globe of democracy... has an election system that may have made a mistake this
time and possibly others in it's past?!!!!!

Do they really think this can happen?!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#8
I figure if you factor in the 4 million dead and illegals who voted Trump won by a couple of million.
#9
(11-27-2016, 11:38 AM)BIAD Wrote: The laughable thing here is that do they really think that an entrenched system
of electing a leader of a first-world country AND a superpower, has not been checked,
re-checked, bits bolted on, dubious parts stripped off and generally formed so that
something so simple as vote-counting can have an alternative outcome?!!

What are they looking for...? If it was rigged in Trump's or Hillary's favour, then do they
honestly think that the same media who favoured the Clinton camp will be allowed to
announce to the world that the United States, the head of the capitalist belief and a standard
across the globe of democracy... has an election system that may have made a mistake this
time and possibly others in it's past?!!!!!

Do they really think this can happen?!
But, But, But, The People LOVE Hillary.
She was Promised This Election, She Was OWED This Election.
The Dead The Illegals The Muslims and People With A Vagina Says So!

Now Then You Have The Normal, Living Breathing Legal and Naturalized Americans That Have an Education That HATE HER!
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSMyW-0G7D8Tmrqh7JdI8M...VUkrm3r9id] [Image: Hllary-Surprise-.gif]
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
[Image: attachment.php?aid=936]
#10
(11-27-2016, 03:56 PM)guohua Wrote: [Image: Hllary-Surprise-.gif]

You know, whenever a political figure or even someone of standing... plus an ex-President
of a country, appears on a stage involving pyrotechnics, exploding sounds and large screens,
they are already fully aware of what is going to happen and where to stand safely.

She's acting like a patronising idiot to her followers and Bill is just acknowledging his next bed-warmer.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#11
Yup, I saw it coming.

I've been uneasy ever since the announcement of Trump's win, waiting for the other shoe to drop. They ran wild in the streets destroying crap, shouting death threats, and shooting folk, trying to intimidate their way into an overturn of the election. That was not the other shoe dropping, and it didn't work. They threatened and intimidated Electors in the Electoral College, a patently illegal move which I am STILL waiting to hear of arrests over, but that was not the other shoe, either, and it's not going to work. They whine and throw snits, hissy fits, screaming fits, and blame Trump for their inability to control their own damned selves at the table such that they over-eat, but that's not the other shoe, either, and it's not going to work. Now they are demanding a recount AFTER ALREADY CONCEDING, AFTER THE PEOPLE HAD ALREADY SPOKEN, but that is not the other shoe, and it's not going to work.

Nope. The other shoe has yet to drop. It's not going to work, either, but it's going to be bloody as all hell when it drops. This really ain't fair. I'm an old man, and have already done my bit, and now I'm going to have to take down my gun belt from it's place of honor, clean it up and get it ready for service yet again. That shit just ain't right.

All this is is the Left closing ranks and getting into formation, colluding and conspiring to usurp the election and sending a signal that that they aren't going to stop until they get their way, like petulant children. That's ALL it means. It's not going to work for them, and it's not the other shoe dropping...

... but that's coming.


.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


#12
(11-27-2016, 11:38 AM)BIAD Wrote: The laughable thing here is that do they really think that an entrenched system
of electing a leader of a first-world country AND a superpower, has not been checked,
re-checked, bits bolted on, dubious parts stripped off and generally formed so that
something so simple as vote-counting can have an alternative outcome?!!

What are they looking for...? If it was rigged in Trump's or Hillary's favour, then do they
honestly think that the same media who favoured the Clinton camp will be allowed to
announce to the world that the United States, the head of the capitalist belief and a standard
across the globe of democracy... has an election system that may have made a mistake this
time and possibly others in it's past?!!!!!

Do they really think this can happen?!


According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all.

This election is a fight for the future of this country for at least the next 40 years and beyond due to trade agreements and supreme court appointments.

I put nothing past them at this point. Everything I predicted about how the left would react has come true, because of the position this election puts them in, either way it went. They were too close to their utopian dream to hand it over now without a fight and I will be surprised if there is not more up their sleeves.

With them letting the Clinton camp so close to the recount where they might be able to salt in enough fake votes to throw the election, anything is possible.

That said, whatever is up their sleeve, whether it's in this recount or something else, is coming I think.
#13
(11-28-2016, 12:44 PM)Grace Wrote: According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all. As a result, if this "recount" flips to Hillary, you will see civil war here, no doubt.  

Well, I can understand that the media will spin it as thus, it means there's a chance of more
exciting news! More excitement means more potential readers, but that doesn't make it any
less serious.

Jill Stein is just on a money-making scam and when it's all over, the idiots who funded her
won't ask where their money went.

The hypocrisy shown is terrible. They demanded that Trump should accept the result of the
election and now, those who it didn't favour the outcome are acting how they thought he
would!

What was the slogan Hillary kept blaring...? "When they take the low road, we take the high"
Yeah, right!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#14
(11-28-2016, 12:55 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 12:44 PM)Grace Wrote: According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all. As a result, if this "recount" flips to Hillary, you will see civil war here, no doubt.  

Well, I can understand that the media will spin it as thus, it means there's a chance of more
exciting news! More excitement means more potential readers, but that doesn't make it any
less serious.

Jill Stein is just on a money-making scam and when it's all over, the idiots who funded her
won't ask where their money went.

The hypocrisy shown is terrible. They demanded that Trump should accept the result of the
election and now, those who it didn't favour the outcome are acting how they thought he
would!

What was the slogan Hillary kept blaring...? "When they take the low road, we take the high"
Yeah, right!


That is the same from the republicans too. They made him sign that contract that he would support whoever won, they all signed it, yet when it came down to it - what? two of them upheld that contract? 

These people say things they don't mean, consistently - republican and democrat both. 


What seems to unite them, is that both sides hate him equally. That my friend is a dangerous thing for the side that wants Trump's policies enacted instead of the globalist agenda. 

I don't see a congress that 's on my side, on either side of the isle, whether or not Stein was just scamming people out of their money.
#15
(11-28-2016, 01:19 PM)Grace Wrote: That is the same from the republicans too. They made him sign that contract that he would support whoever won, they all signed it, yet when it came down to it  - what? two of them upheld that contract? 

These people say things they don't mean, consistently - republican and democrat both. 


What seems to unite them, is that both sides hate him equally. That my friend is a dangerous thing for the side that wants Trump's policies enacted instead of the globalist agenda. 

I don't see a congress that 's on my side, on either side of the isle, whether or not Stein was just scamming people out of their money.

And that's the dilemma both parties recognise. Donald Trump wasn't elected by the people because
he was a Republican, he was elected because they didn't want Hillary Clinton. What that tells the senior
members of both parties is that neither of them are really wanted.

It can be looked at in two ways.
Donald Trump may indicate that the citizens of the United States are tired of the established parties
and unwilling to go with any of the peripheral groups because they see them as just another set of
ivy-league, upper-middle class money-grabbers.
This could mean that they should look at ways of re-inventing themselves and start listening to their
electorate again.

The people voted in Donald Trump as a singular... a stand-alone person who's overall view fits the
majority's wishes of Government. That -to any established political party, is terrifying.

I know the we tend to see the established set of governance as set in stone and I seriously doubt
it will change. But it's perceived by the politicians that they've got a maverick businessman in the
White House who doesn't appreciate the trough for the boys and doesn't really know how to
'pussy-foot' about in regards of keeping the masses subdued.

How does it work...? Will he agree to some numb-assed funding program in my State to help me
get re-elected? Will he understand that signing off billions of dollars for clandestine operations with
little result, is important in the overall scheme of things?
Aw Hell...! What if he asks the voters?!!

All this is because he's not one them.... with all his money, he's not one of them.
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#16
As an add-on, remember we're just as smart as those who believe they can manipulate
the Government and I think this video shows how a suit and tie isn't always an indicator
of intelligence!

Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe. 
#17
(11-28-2016, 12:44 PM)Grace Wrote: According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all.

Everyone knows that the most predictable way to go is to set the fox guarding the hen house. You may not LIKE the results of such action, but there is little doubt that you can predict them. If you want a predictable future to factor into your planning, then the safest bet is to always set the fox guarding the hen house.

Quote:This election  is a fight for the future of this country for at least the next 40 years and beyond due to trade agreements and supreme court appointments.

Indeed. See above paragraph for thought on factoring predictability into long-range planning efforts.

Quote:I put nothing past them at this point. Everything I predicted about how the left would react has come true, because of the position this election puts them in, either way it went. They were too close to their utopian dream to hand it over now without a fight and I will be surprised if there is not more up their sleeves.

There IS more up their sleeves, and it ain't pretty. Just ask a Cuban, a Nicaraguan, an El Salvadoran, an older Russian (from the Soviet days, which the Democrats are furiously trying to blend in with the new Russian Federation to pull the wool over folks' eyes), an Angolan, a Zimbabwean, a Campuchean, the list goes on and on. This story has played out on innumerable stages before - it's just our turn now. It has been defeated upon occasion, but in each of those cases of defeat, there was a strong anti-communist government already in place to combat it, which is not the case here. Don't look to the government for help against the insurgency because our current government SUPPORTS the insurgency, and it'll take time to clean house even after a governmental handoff. That time it takes is what the Collectivists are banking on - they'll throw the rod and insert the wedges before that cleanup can occur, to keep things off balance and the turmoil in play. Collectivism cannot win except by maintaining chaos.

Quote:With them letting the Clinton camp so close to the recount where they might be able to salt in enough fake votes to throw the election, anything is possible.

That said, whatever is up their sleeve, whether it's in this recount or something else, is coming I think.

Yup, it's coming. Salting in MORE votes for Clinton will not be sufficient - they've already salted in 4 million fake votes (dead folk and illegal aliens), and that wasn't enough. They will also have to either negate or "flip" a large quantity of Trump votes, "lose" them in some way, to create the turnover. Look for  a large number of "misplaced" votes to come into the mix, just as was done by the Collectivists on behalf of Al Franken a few years back. Remember those "forgotten votes" they suddenly "found" in some guy's trunk? Yeah, look for something like THAT to happen... but it won't be enough, and they will have to flip a number of Trump votes to succeed.

I don't think it will be successful, even with the foxes running the hen house, and when it isn't, I expect all hell is going to break loose.

Emotional people are dangerous people, as any study of the Mob Mentality will tell you. The emotional polarity currently found in the US has only been seen here a few times, and every time it has, hell came to dinner. The 1960's and the American Civil War were such times. We have now, for several years - a couple decades - been inexorably moving towards Collectivism (what you are referring to as "Globalism"). That was the reason for the Neocon takeover of the Republican party - so that the Republicans would march in lockstep with the Socialists and Democrats. That is why you have not seen any major changes when government was "handed over" from one to the other. they are - or were - both sides of the same coin, and one administration would just take over where the last left off and steer in the same direction, regardless of which letter was in front of their names. They all acted the same. Now, along comes Trump and upsets the apple cart for them, which explains why BOTH sides went after Trump... and will continue to do so, the "civil unrest" (that's a euphemism - it's what polite folk call "insurrection and civil war") is calculated to keep folk off-balance so they don't notice the game in play... or their bit parts in it.

Interesting times we live in. The fight against Communism is apparently not as dead as folks thought when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Wall came down. It has only changed the location of it's power centers.


.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


#18
(11-28-2016, 06:04 PM)Ninurta Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 12:44 PM)Grace Wrote: According to the post they are letting the Clinton campaign "oversee" the recount..

I don't trust that at all, at all.

Everyone knows that the most predictable way to go is to set the fox guarding the hen house. You may not LIKE the results of such action, but there is little doubt that you can predict them. If you want a predictable future to factor into your planning, then the safest best is to always set the fox guarding the hen house.

Quote:This election  is a fight for the future of this country for at least the next 40 years and beyond due to trade agreements and supreme court appointments.

Indeed. See above paragraph for thought on factoring predictability into long-range planning efforts.

Quote:I put nothing past them at this point. Everything I predicted about how the left would react has come true, because of the position this election puts them in, either way it went. They were too close to their utopian dream to hand it over now without a fight and I will be surprised if there is not more up their sleeves.

There IS more up their sleeves, and it ain't pretty. Just ask a Cuban, a Nicaraguan, an El Salvadoran, an older Russian (from the Soviet days, which the Democrats are furiously trying to blend in with the new Russian Federation to pull the wool over folks' eyes), an Angolan, a Zimbabwean, a Campuchean, the list goes on and on. This story has played out on innumerable stages before - it's just our turn now. It has been defeated upon occasion, but in each of those cases of defeat, there was a strong anti-communist government already in place to combat it, which is not the case here. Don't look to the government for help against the insurgency because our current government SUPPORTS the insurgency, and it'll take time to clean house even after a governmental handoff. That time it takes is what the Collectivists are banking on - they'll throw the rod and insert the wedges before that cleanup can occur, to keep things off balance and the turmoil in play. Collectivism cannot win except by maintaining chaos.

Quote:With them letting the Clinton camp so close to the recount where they might be able to salt in enough fake votes to throw the election, anything is possible.

That said, whatever is up their sleeve, whether it's in this recount or something else, is coming I think.

Yup, it's coming. Salting in MORE votes for Clinton will not be sufficient - they've already salted in 4 million fake votes (dead folk and illegal aliens), and that wasn't enough. They will also have to either negate or "flip" a large quantity of Trump votes, "lose" them in some way, to create the turnover. Look for  a large number of "misplaced" votes to come into the mix, just as was done by the Collectivists on behalf of Al Franken a few years back. Remember those "forgotten votes" they suddenly "found" in some guy's trunk? Yeah, look for something like THAT to happen... but it won't be enough, and they will have to flip a number of Trump votes to succeed.

I don't think it will be successful, even with the foxes running the hen house, and when it isn't, I expect all hell is going to break loose.

Emotional people are dangerous people, as any study of the Mob Mentality will tell you. The emotional polarity currently found in the US has only been seen here a few times, and every time it has, hell came to dinner. The 1960's and the American Civil War were such times. We have now, for several years - a couple decades - been inexorably moving towards Collectivism (what you are referring to as "Globalism"). That was the reason for the Neocon takeover of the Republican party - so that the Republicans would march in lockstep with the Socialists and Democrats. That is why you have not seen any major changes when government was "handed over" from one to the other. they are - or were - both sides of the same coin, and one administration would just take over where the last left off and steer in the same direction, regardless of which letter was in front of their names. They all acted the same. Now, along comes Trump and upsets the apple cart for them, which explains why BOTH sides went after Trump... and will continue to do so, the "civil unrest" (that's a euphemism - it's what polite folk call "insurrection and civil war") is calculated to keep folk off-balance so they don't notice the game in play... or their bit parts in it.

Interesting tomes we live in. The fight against Communism is apparently not as dead as folks thought when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Wall came down. It has only changed the location of it's power centers.


.



True... very true.
#19
(11-28-2016, 05:23 PM)BIAD Wrote: As an add-on, remember we're just as smart as those who believe they can manipulate
the Government and I think this video shows how a suit and tie isn't always an indicator
of intelligence!


Sad but telling, perhaps, is the fact that the video has now been deleted, along with the associated account, for "copyright infringement" - since when are congressional hearings "copyrighted"? I smell a rat in the wood pile there.

About the suit and tie thing - I have a theory, which I have held since I was in my mid-20's. Through observation, I have noticed that otherwise intelligent folk, when climbing the corporate ladder, reach a point where they are forced to wear ties. Beyond that point, the further they climb, the dumber they get. My theory is that the tie is cutting off circulation to their brains and they are being permanently dumbed-down via oxygen starvation to vital thinking tissue.

That's one of the reasons I refuse to wear ties, the other being that I come from a long line of horse-thieves, and therefore have a genetic aversion to having anything with a slip knot in it tied around my neck.

Food for thought.

ETA: For the curious, the title of the video was "Trey Gowdy Super Pissed at Jonathan Gruber Calling A..."


.
Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king.

Said Aristippus, ‘If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.’ Said Diogenes, ‘Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.’


#20
(11-28-2016, 09:03 PM)Ninurta Wrote:
(11-28-2016, 05:23 PM)BIAD Wrote: As an add-on, remember we're just as smart as those who believe they can manipulate
the Government and I think this video shows how a suit and tie isn't always an indicator
of intelligence!


Sad but telling, perhaps, is the fact that the video has now been deleted, along with the associated account, for "copyright infringement" - since when are congressional hearings "copyrighted"? I smell a rat in the wood pile there.

About the suit and tie thing - I have a theory, which I have held since I was in my mid-20's. Through observation, I have noticed that otherwise intelligent folk, when climbing the corporate ladder, reach a point where they are forced to wear ties. Beyond that point, the further they climb, the dumber they get. My theory is that the tie is cutting off circulation to their brains and they are being permanently dumbed-down via oxygen starvation to vital thinking tissue.

That's one of the reasons I refuse to wear ties, the other being that I come from a long line of horse-thieves, and therefore have a genetic aversion to having anything with a slip knot in it tied around my neck.

Food for thought.

ETA: For the curious, the title of the video was "Trey Gowdy Super Pissed at Jonathan Gruber Calling A..."


.



Here is a working link, for now. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7F41hgkkmqg


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)