11-26-2016, 07:45 PM
Well, not breaking but definitely scripted.
Only funny because it's true:
Jude
Only funny because it's true:
Jude
Proof that mainstream media is scripted
|
11-26-2016, 07:45 PM
Well, not breaking but definitely scripted.
Only funny because it's true: Jude
11-26-2016, 07:51 PM
Yeah, that ought to show the people how scripted our MSM is.
If they don't "get it" from this video... they're beyond hope.
11-26-2016, 10:16 PM
Do you see the smugness...?
That's all it takes, a tele-prompter, a reassuring voice and facial features that smack of knowing confidence. The majority of mainstream media news reports are 'climb-downs'... the report is designed to intrigue initially and then with the announcer's voice hinting of a socially agreed tone of reasoning, the story is taken back to nothingness. The news is reported, the media tells it's listener/viewer that all is well and nobody gets their nose pushed out of the establishment circles. And the masses eat it up!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.
11-26-2016, 10:29 PM
No different than Actors if it's not wrote for them, they can't think on their own and then they act like they Know Everything about the World and Your Life and Politics.
Once A Rogue, Always A Rogue!
11-27-2016, 11:17 AM
(11-26-2016, 10:29 PM)guohua Wrote: No different than Actors if it's not wrote for them, they can't think on their own and then (What I reluctantly want to think.) The majority of a Journalist's premise is that if the person they're interviewing hold's a high-standing position in society, the accepted norm is that the person will always tell the full truth. Mainstream media perceive that people 'off the street' don't hold that type of virtue and are ignorant of the subtleties in politics and business. This is due to the same media failing to explain that the same subtleties involve a kind of deceit. If it's seen that asking appropriate questions that are not harmful to a person of renown, keeps you in the correct circles, then where do you stop and ask what those same people of the street really want to know? Remember, the small collection of 'aggressive' Journalists made their bones through the use of time and this tends to happen because of the lack of political toes they've stood on during their years. (What I believe through experience in that trade.) Many Journalists know where their bread is buttered and report what the establishment want them to report. The world is how they present it because they present it and after a length of time, new Journalists come long and don't know any difference. There are genuine Journalists out there, but sometimes you've got to shape your story to fit a required narrative in order to keep your job. Your family can't eat your morality. As mainstream media shows, Journalists talk to Journalists, Presenters discuss topics with others in their occupation because a mutually-agreed agenda is assumed the correct one and ergo, the audience will either know this or will accept that this the correct view. It's an echo-bubble and whether it's deliberate or not, it's having a negative effect on their profession. I'm curious that if this current viewer/readership attitude continues, what these media outlets will do about it? Will they embrace the whole social media community and strive to improve disciplines within it or even attempt to change it's global view with the use of their word-use subtleties? At this time, it seems they're just manning the walls and shouting down the opinions of those who didn't come through the standard avenues of Journalism. I suppose the worrying aspect for this trade is that if they allow social media to be recognised within the established norm, it dilutes their own standing. Not all social media reporters get paid or are in unions!
Edith Head Gives Good Wardrobe.
11-27-2016, 08:12 PM
11-27-2016, 08:55 PM
I really miss Cenk on MSNBC. It made the station somewhat watchable...He's still fun (and refreshing) to watch back on TYT though
@"Armonica_Templar" |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|