We've heard a little about it when Sanders was running. We've heard a little about it while Trump is running.
This article is from July 2016, when Bernie was head to head with Hillary.
It just so happens that a leak came out from an insider. And it ain't pretty.
Quote:The mainstream media has been attempting to paint the Clinton email scandal as the only scandal, however those in the know have been encouraging us to ‘focus on the Foundation,’ claiming that the corruption runs deep and wide, involving not just the Clintons but most of government, including Barack Obama.
Say what? And here I thought that the most important news of the day was that some porn star was claiming sexual misconduct against Donald Trump...
Hey...CNN...ABC...NBC....FOX....anything to say about this???
.....crickets.....
Sit down, have a coffee, or some hard stuff, or smoke a joint even...it gets better....
Quote:The Clinton Foundation is a “massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” according to an FBI insider. When asked how deeply Obama was involved, the FBI insider said “Impeachment-level deep.”
Impea...what ????
Oh. Yeah. Trump wanted to grab women's p*****s... OK. 11 years ago. Ah. Ok. Interesting. Not.
Quote:Hillary Clinton’s involvement cannot be denied. She is named in the foundation’s title. She collects money in their name and has collected from foreign dignitaries while working as Secretary of State.
Oh. no. Nope. Not Hillary. C'mon man. She was on Ellen just the other day...nah...
But I'm just curious. Which foreign dignitaries?
Now I need a coffee too. And whiskey. And a joint. Actually, double on all of those.
But but but but but....she said in the debates that she's extremely respectful of women...and gays...but but but but but....don't these countries treat those women and gays like shit? Well, actually, they don't throw shit off the roof of buildings. Or beat and rape or torture shit.
Dunno. Just questioning...
Quote:“The Clinton Foundation…has been part of an international charity fraud network whose entire cumulative scale (counting inflows and outflows) approaches and may even exceed $100 billion measured from 1997 forward. Yet state, federal and foreign government authorities, that should be keenly aware of this massive set of criminal frauds, so far, move at a snail’s pace, perhaps waiting for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to reveal the scope of its work and the nature of any findings.”
THINGS YOU WILL NOT HEAR ABOUT ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA.
One of the rumors floating around was that the reason the FBI did not pursue the email scandal any further, knew it would uncover a lot more than they were willing to expose.
Think they wanted to drop it before it dug too deep and unveiled Obama's part in all of it.
Funny, if not for the Benghazi trial, we would not have found about Hillary's private email server.
And the hearing about the use of her private email server exposed the Clinton Foundation.
Can you imagine what they would have found out if they did not chicken out and put a stop to the investigation???
Think we can also thank Wkikleaks for showing just how corrupt the Clinton's are, not that it will convince the hardcore Hillary supporters.
Now when I watch Hillary in a speech talk about democracy,truth and rule of law, I just want to bitch slap her.
She is so phony and dishonest it is disgusting.
And scary to know that she may just win Presidency.
Hillary will never change her evil wicked corrupt lying ways.
It will only continue if not worsen once in the White House.
10-26-2016, 05:17 AM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2016, 05:36 AM by senona.)
The guy on the video says they are still checking into this story but Russian news is reporting that Eric Braverman, former CEO to Clinton foundation, actually has sought asylum at the Russian consulate office.
If true, wish he would expose the truth of the matter, concerning what the Clinton Foundation really is/does.
Even if it means unveiling other high ranking officials that are involved i.e. Obama.
No wonder why he is in fear for his life and seeking asylum with the Russian consulate.
10-26-2016, 09:41 AM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2016, 09:43 AM by BIAD.)
Below is an oldie-but-a-goodie to show how Mrs. Clinton's only goal is to acquire
monies and damn to the country she says she honours.
'Hillary's State Dept. OK'd Bill's big-money speeches.
Ethics reviews came easy at Hillary Clinton's State Department, documents show.'
'Less than a year after Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, former President Bill Clinton asked the State Department to approve a paid, videotaped speech he was asked to make at a gala in Shanghai, sponsored by a Chinese sports foundation.
Wealthy hedge fund manager Kai Jiang wanted to pay the former president an undisclosed amount through a charity fund set up by his wife, Crystal Huang, a Chinese TV and film star who regularly serves as fodder for the Chinese tabloids.
But unlike hundreds of big-dollar Bill Clinton speeches that sailed through a State Department ethics approval process while Hillary Clinton served as America’s top diplomat, this one raised a note of caution that the Chinese government might actually be funding the speech or planning to profit from it.
The inconclusive bureaucratic back and forth — with weeks of emails asking for greater detail — made clear the difficulties the government faced getting information about Bill Clinton’s far-flung moneymaking efforts through an ethics review process Hillary Clinton agreed to when she joined President Barack Obama’s Cabinet...' SOURCE:
10-26-2016, 09:53 AM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2016, 09:54 AM by BIAD.)
'The Six Clinton Foundation Scandals Everyone Needs to Know.'
'The Clinton Foundation, the nonprofit charity organization run by Bill and Hillary Clinton (that also provides a career to untalented daughter Chelsea), has been in the news recently over what is truthfully just its latest scandal.
The media has latched onto the news that more than half of those who received a personal meeting with Hillary Clinton while she was the secretary of state had also donated to the Foundation.
In truth, this is just one of many scandals the Foundation is involved in—but most others have been reported and quickly forgotten, in favor of blowing up something GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump said or did.
Even this latest scandal is trying to be diluted by some in the media. As mainstream journalists continue to point out how bad this is for Clinton, Politico reported that Steve Bannon—Trump’s new campaign CEO and executive director of Breitbart.com—was charged with domestic violence two decades ago.
Though these charges were dismissed, Politico thought the decades-old story warranted a breaking news email.
The media will try to memory-hole this latest Clinton Foundation scandal, but it can’t be forgotten.
Nor can these other Foundation scandals. This is probably not a comprehensive list, but here are the most egregious.
1. Selling access to the U.S. State Department.
I already briefly mentioned this scandal, as it is the most recent. Of the 154 people who met with or had conference calls scheduled with Hillary, at least 85 donated to the Clinton Foundation, according to an Associated Press analysis.
The 85 donors gave a combined total of $156 million to the Clinton Foundation, and at least 40 gave more than $100,000 each. At least 20 gave more than $1 million.
How could anyone possibly believe these donations didn’t help get a meeting with Clinton? Turns out only Clinton’s staunchest supporters are defending her on this.
The LA Times’ Thursday editorial called for Clinton to leave the foundation. The New York Daily News’ Gersh Kuntzman said this scandal was “impossible” to defend.
2. Sketchy foreign donations from abusive nations.
Clinton purports to be a defender of women and has talked about running coal miners out of business (an extension of the Left’s hatred for “Big Oil”), yet her foundation has taken money from countries that commit human rights abuses against women and make their money from selling oil.
In February 2015, The Wall Street Journal reported that Australia, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and a Canadian government agency that was trying to get the Keystone XL pipeline built all donated to the Clinton Foundation.
Obviously, Australia and Germany don’t count as “abusive nations,” but donations from former foreign governments is strange of itself—it had always been clear that Clinton would run for president again.
And the donations from Saudi Arabia were especially troubling, since Clinton claims to be a champion of women yet Saudi Arabia bans women from driving or interacting with men to whom they are not related.
3. Using the State Department to help her husband.
While his wife was the secretary of state, Bill Clinton’s speaking fees magically doubled and tripled, from about $150,000 a speech to $500,000 for a speech in Russia and $750,000 for a speech in China. The State Department approved these speeches.
How wonderful was it for Bill Clinton to have his wife oversee a department that approved his big-money gigs?
4. Donations in return for Bill Clinton speeches.
Bill raked in at least $26 million from speaking to organizations that also donated to the Clinton Foundation. Sure, they paid him to speak to him, and he may have spoken to them just for the money, but I’m sure it didn’t hurt that they also donated to the foundation.
5. Huma Abedin working for State and the Foundation.
For six months in 2012, longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin appeared to be superwoman. She was working for Clinton’s State Department, as well as the Clinton Foundation, Clinton’s personal office and a consulting firm tied to the Clintons. How did she do it?
The Foundation was subpoenaed over Abedin’s work, and was also under investigation by the FBI for ties to the State Department. How it was even legal that Abedin worked for both is astounding.
6. Helping foreign entities that donated to the Foundation.
Clinton was a member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission while she was secretary of state. The commission was working on a “request to approve the sale of U.S. uranium stock to Russian atomic energy agency Rosatom as part of a transitioned takeover of a company which through an earlier merger had acquired U.S. uranium interests,” Politico reported.
Surprise, surprise: Rosatom had ties to the Clinton Foundation. Rosatom acquired 17 percent of a South African company called Uranium One in 2009. In 2007, Uranium One merged with UrAsia, which was owned by Frank Giustra.
Giustra gave $31 million to the Clinton Foundation in 2006 and pledged $100 million more in the following years. Giustra along with Bill Clinton, acquired uranium interests in Kazakhstan in 2005.
The chairman of Uranium One when it was acquired by Rosatom, Ian Telfer, also gave $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation.
Then there was the UBS deal, in which Hillary Clinton intervened. The IRS was suing Swiss bank UBS AG in order to obtain the identities of Americans who used the bank to set up offshore accounts.
Again, unsurprisingly, after Clinton stepped in, UBS increased donations to the Clinton Foundation —from $60,000 to $600,000 by 2014. It lent the foundation $32 million for an inner-city loan program and paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million for some speaking gigs with its Wealth Mangement Chief Executive, Bob McCann...' SOURCE:
10-26-2016, 10:08 AM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2016, 10:08 AM by BIAD.)
'No comment: Clinton has 'nothing to say' about Wikileaks email revealing $12M quid pro quo with Morocco's king that an aide said was a 'mess' of her own making.'
* 'I have nothing to say about Wikileaks, other than I think we should all be concerned about what the Russians are trying to do to our election'
* Democratic nominee was responding to a question posed by DailyMail.com during a question and answer session on her plane.
* Trump went on offense over the 'pay for play' agreement at a rally Friday.
* Emial from Huma Abedin revealed how Clinton got King of Morocco to underwrite $12m Clinton Foundation summit.
* Abedin revealed: 'The condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation.'
* She backed out of Marrakesh event amid a human rights storm after Abedin wrote: 'She created this mess and she knows it.'
'A stone-faced Hillary Clinton refused to comment on an email a top aide sent calling a Clinton Foundation quid pro qou a 'mess' of the former secretary of state's own making.
'I have nothing to say about Wikileaks, other than I think we should all be concerned about what the Russians are trying to do to our election and using Wikileaks very blatantly to try to influence the outcome of the election,' Clinton said on Saturday.
The Democratic nominee was responding to a question posed by DailyMail.com during a media avail with reporters riding on her campaign plane.
Hacked emails revealed an internal disagreement among Clinton's aides about her desire to hold a conference in Marrakech, Morocco. The country's king made a $12 million pledge to fund the Clinton Global Initiative conference - but only if the the likely presidential candidate attended.
Top confidante Huma Abedin bluntly wrote in a January 2015 email that 'if HRC was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter.' Then she warned: 'She created this mess and she knows it.' It was an uncharacteristic remark from Abedin, who is known for her abiding loyalty to Clinton over the years...' SOURCE:
Known all that for several years ...... and as usual not a damn thing will be done to bring down killerys criminal syndicate ...... *leaves case of whisky for sol*
Better to reign in hell ....
than serve in heaven .....
(10-26-2016, 05:17 AM)senona Wrote: The guy on the video says they are still checking into this story but Russian news is reporting that Eric Braverman, former CEO to Clinton foundation, actually has sought asylum at the Russian consulate office.
Snopes.com has quickly jumped on the bandwagon denouncing the whole thing as a Sorcha Faal story but hasn't given any evidence of such a claim.
Might be, benefit of the doubt and all that... but the real problem is that Eric Braverman hasn't been heard from since October 12th, 2016.
Quote:So that leads back to the original question – Where is Eric Braverman?
Eric wasn’t a prolific user of Twitter, so the fact that his last tweet was on October 12th is of little note, but a fact none-the-less.
Braverman’s Facebook account is almost empty so that’s not much of an indicator either.
So all that are left are questions:
Why hasn’t Eric spoken up, shown up or otherwise notified anyone that he is ok?
Why hasn’t his family spoken up – don’t they know where he is?
Why isn’t there a confirmation or denial from the Russian embassy? Lack of either raises more questions than it answers.
Finally, here is one darn interesting theory. Braverman may have been a mole, being tracked down by Podesta.
Quote:Then, the Clinton campaign starts a witch hunt for a mole that Podesta ultimately identifies as the now missing Mr. Braverman:
Neera Tanden warns John Podesta to “keep tabs on Doug Band” who she assumed was the insider who told NBC to “follow the money and find the real HRC scandal.” Interestingly, John Podesta writes back quickly to identify the real source as former Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman which seems to be shocking to Tanden who replies simply, “Holy Moses.”
So the supposed motive is that his being a mole was exposed on WikiLeaks and fearing death or some other disagreeable outcome, he chose to run, hide, seek asylum or … something.
I feel for the guy, if all of this is true, he's walked into a lose/lose situation.
If they catch up to him and all of this is true, he's a goner.
If they don't catch up to him, if all of this is true, he becomes the perfect scapegoat when all of this Foundation crap goes down in flames, when investigated.
If all of this is true, his only recourse is to lay everything out in the open, in all the medias, before he gets crucified.
I have a feeling that we haven't even scratched the surface of this story yet.
10-28-2016, 10:46 AM (This post was last modified: 10-28-2016, 10:46 AM by BIAD.)
Maybe-maybe, it's starting.
'Latest WikiLeaks dump ties Clinton Foundation to personal enrichment claims'
'Former advisers boast of securing more than $100m for ‘Bill Clinton Inc’ after being questioned about their own conflicts of interest'
Donald Trump’s campaign has seized on embarrassing revelations of blurred lines between the Clinton Foundation and the family’s business interests, as fresh WikiLeaks emails cause their biggest political stir yet.
The new disclosures detail the extent of what was dubbed “Bill Clinton Inc” by advisers who boasted of securing more than $100m for the former president when challenged about their own conflicts of interest.
One email discussing an internal investigation into whether the foundation’s charitable status was at risk reveals Chelsea Clinton warning that her father would be “horrified” to hear that comparisons were being made between his activities and “Tony Blair’s profit motivations”.
Now the affair threatens to cast a cloud over Hillary Clinton’s campaign as demands are made for the full internal audit to be made public rather than just the snapshots provided via WikiLeaks.
“The revelation that the Clinton Foundation undertook an in-depth investigation into whether they were violating IRS charity rules because of the money-making efforts of the Clintons is deeply concerning,” said Trump spokesman Jason Miller on Thursday.
“In the matter of transparency, the Clintons must release all the internal documents related to the investigation of the Foundation, including interview notes and other supporting documentation as well as all initial and preliminary reports.”
WikiLeaks has been releasing embarrassing and sometimes revelatory emails from Hillary Clinton and key figures in her party since July, giving an unprecedented insight into the workings of her campaign and foundation and raising hopes on the right that the group may publish something truly damaging before election day.
The Clinton campaign has largely shrugged off the apparent release of emails sent to its chairman John Podesta, pointing out that US intelligence believes the hacking was carried out by Russia in an attempt to manipulate the presidential election. It did not respond to a request for comment on the latest claims.
But the disclosures reveal undeniable concerns even within the family that those around the Clintons were seeking to profit from their political connections in inappropriate ways.
“It makes me very sad,” wrote Chelsea Clinton, who alleged, in one case, that British members
of parliament had been called by advisers claiming to speak for her father but instead acting for commercial clients such as Dow Chemical.
“[This] without my father’s knowledge, and inelegantly and ineffectually at best, and at worse ... now precipitating people in London [to] make comparisons between my father and Tony Blair’s profit motivations, which would horrify my father.”
Nonetheless, attempts to blame Clinton advisers for exploiting their political ties provoked a fierce response from one who claimed the former president “and his family” also benefitted from “personal travel, hospitality and vacations” as a result of their string-pulling.
“How then do we go through an exercise like this [the internal review] and WJC [William Jefferson
Clinton] doesn’t as he is far more conflicted every single day in what he does? Why not apply the structure you set up for him to this situation?” wrote Doug Band, a former personal aide or “body man” to the former president who went on to set up a highly successful business consultancy called Teneo.
“Oddly, WJC does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by three [Clinton Global Initiative] sponsors, [and] gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home,” added Band, in reference to recommendations form the review.
In a report defending his role, Band also points out that he and another close aide personally secured “$50m in for-profit activity” and “$66m in future contracts” for president Clinton, including an estimated $20m in paid speeches.
The report details how clients of Teneo such as Coca-Cola, Dow, UBS and BHP Billiton were encouraged to make donations to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for personal meetings with the former president, sometimes at the family homes in Washington and Chappaqua.
One email also reveals how Podesta was persuaded to meet with BHP while he was a senior adviser to Barrack Obama, writing to Band: “For you, I’ll try.”
Band acknowledged that both he and Teneo partner Declan Kelly – a former chairman of London public relations giant Financial Dynamics and US economic envoy to Northern Ireland – “appreciate the unorthodox nature of our roles”, but felt it was appropriate to steer clients into making donations to the Clinton Foundation.
“As the memo demonstrates, Teneo worked to encourage clients, where appropriate, to support the Clinton Foundation because of the good work that it does around the world,” said their company in a statement released to the Guardian. “It also clearly shows that Teneo never received any financial benefit or benefit of any kind from doing so.”
Nonetheless the law firm hired by the Foundation to review its relationships warned that some corporate donors “may have an expectation of quid pro quo benefits in return for gift”, according to one report revealed by WikiLeaks.
“Mr Band called the arrangement ‘unorthodox’, the rest of us call it outright corruption,” claimed Trump in a statement on Thursday.
“If the Clintons were willing to play this fast and loose with their enterprise when they weren’t in the White House, just imagine what they will do if they are given the chance to control the Oval Office.” SOURCE:
I've discovered, that as with the Obama election and his No Experience Record, they don't Care.
The People Are Brain Dead, They Believe Every Thing The MSM Feeds Them and They Go back To atching "E", "The View" and Honey BooBoo!
They Are Sheeple!
(10-28-2016, 06:03 PM)guohua Wrote: I've discovered, that as with the Obama election and his No Experience Record, they don't Care.
The People Are Brain Dead, They Believe Every Thing The MSM Feeds Them and They Go back To atching "E", "The View" and Honey BooBoo!
They Are Sheeple!
10-30-2016, 10:38 PM (This post was last modified: 10-30-2016, 10:43 PM by Sol.)
**UPDATE**
Former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom says it as it is.
Quote:“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”
Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”
He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.
“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”
“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.
Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.
“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said.
Former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom says it as it is.
Quote:“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”
Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”
He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.
“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”
“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.
Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.
“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said.
![[Image: image-14.jpeg]](http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/image-14.jpeg)
![[Image: clinton-foundation-800x350.jpg]](http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clinton-foundation-800x350.jpg)
![[Image: 5073d8484ef4496ba6acacef201dd90f.png]](http://image.prntscr.com/image/5073d8484ef4496ba6acacef201dd90f.png)
