The Blue Pill.

[BIAD]

In an effort to show what I meant by the failing MSM taking a side to maintain an outrage paradigm, here's the
BBC displaying an uninformative article that leans heavily on emotional dissent. They know it annoys both sides
when penned correctly and offers a 'baddie' and the virtuous 'victims'... usually framed -via a photograph, as a
young person.

The simple truth is that the mainstream media have given-up on anyone over 45 years-old and now pursue the
kids as possible 'next-gen' customers.
Good luck with that!

Brett Kavanaugh confirmation: Victory for Trump in Supreme Court battle.

'President Donald Trump's controversial nominee for the Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, has been sworn in
following weeks of rancorous debate. The Senate earlier backed his nomination by 50 votes to 48.
Mr Kavanaugh had been embroiled in a bitter battle to stave off claims of sexual assault, which he denies...'

Ignoble at best. The Hearing was requested due to the claims and at the time of writing, there's indications that
the accusations were politically-driven. There no evidence of the crimes -because that's what they would be, and
due to the shrewd verve to write such implications, the divisive act shows that the alleged criminal act towards
Blasey Ford was never important, stopping Kavanaugh getting to the Supreme Court was.

Most reading this may smile at my inexperience of political-jousting and they'd be right. But it's the exhibition of
bogus affront by poor actors that I believe is the concern here. Using words like 'honourable' and 'trust' as mere
bullets to destroy ones enemy shows how crass many of the participants of this shit-show really are.

'...But after an 11th-hour investigation by the FBI into the allegations, enough wavering senators decided to support
the nomination. His confirmation hands Mr Trump a political victory ahead of key mid-term elections in November...'

And Blasey Ford...? She believes she was sexually assaulted by a young Brett Kavanaugh back in the mid-early
eighties. What are the concerned Democrats and Republicans doing about that?
You see...? Ford's claim as been relegated to a claim and Kavanaugh's name and family have been insulted,
but the real reason for the terrible carnival is now accepted as the norm.

Reporting an 'eleventh-hour investigation' is also a poor representation of what really occurred and it shows how
the FBI are used in a child-like fictive constabulary. Six investigations had already taken place into Kavanaugh's
past and nothing was found. There was never any opinions that the FBI had failed to unearth Ford's purported
situation, nor that such a failing would then be found due to a better examination.

Regardless of the Bureau's inability to referee on an outcome, why didn't the same mainstream media accuse
the FBI of suppressing the sexual assault...? Because it would possibly indicate the agency had -and still is, being
used as a political-tool instead of performing the role it was created for.

So to compound the bias and vaguely point to this -along with other histrionics, that having Donald Trump in the
White House is not the greatest of idead, the MSM turn to emotions and undeveloped minds.

'...Before the vote, hundreds of people protested against Mr Kavanaugh's nomination at the US Capitol in Washington.
During the vote, other protesters shouted "shame" from the public gallery and Vice-President Mike Pence had to call
for order to be restored...'

I'll wager Blasey Ford wasn't among the protesters, the actual alleged victim that generated all of this.
One has to wonder if the female that Vice-President Pence had removed from the gallery had been raped or sexually
assaulted and whether she has or will contact the proper authorities.
If not, it's merely a puerile tantrum in a forum where mature decisions are debated upon and decided.

Again, we all know the truth of why Judge was required to answer questions in front of partisan Senators and the
excited public, it was because of Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court and concerns regarding abortion.
Blasey Ford and her memories have faded into the background now and the 'Creepy-Porn Lawyer' has returned to
booking his client into another tit-wiggling gig far from Washington DC.

Its a disgrace that will be archived until the MSM pendulum swings the other way, but the conduct will always be frowned
at in the future and in other power-bases across the world, it will be mocked. Ironically, the reality-show environment that
President Trump left, followed him from the superficial lands of Hollywood and is dining high-off-the-hog in the nation's
capital.

Anyway, back to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford dealing with her ordeal. Er, it seems not. 

'...Mr Kavanaugh's appointment is for life and he will strengthen conservative control of the nine-judge court, which has the
final say on US law. The 53 year old was sworn in on Saturday evening in a private ceremony at the Supreme Court. Chief
Justice John Roberts administered the constitutional oath and retired justice Anthony Kennedy - whom Mr Kavanaugh is
replacing - administered the judicial oath...'

There it is, the ruse displayed that everyone knew was the real reason for the Hearing debacle.
The biased media couldn't help themselves.

'...Protesters had gathered outside the court and at one point some ran up the steps and banged on its ornate doors.
Other demonstrators climbed on the nearby statue of justice...'

Because that's what kids do. They make noise and stick out their bottom lips. But it doesn't mean their bawling and behavior
has any merit, only the subject-matter is relevant. 

'...What has Mr Trump said?
He sent out a tweet of congratulations:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
 I applaud and congratulate the U.S. Senate for confirming our GREAT NOMINEE, Judge Brett Kavanaugh,
to the United States Supreme Court. Later today, I will sign his Commission of Appointment, and he will be
officially sworn in. Very exciting!

Later he spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One, saying Mr Kavanaugh had withstood a "horrible attack by the Democrats"
and that women were "outraged" at what had happened to the nominee. Mr Trump also said he was "100% certain" that the
woman who had accused Mr Kavanaugh of sexual assault, Christine Blasey Ford, had named the wrong person...'

And oddly enough, this suggestion of mistaken identity is generally accepted by most fair-minded people looking at
this situation. Dr. Ford did give-off the impression something awful happened to her, but the evidence offered didn't
indicate the perpetrator was Judge Kavanaugh.

The BBC are said to be neutral, so we'll get back to worrying about an accusation from Blasey Ford being ignored and the
assumed reasons people are protesting against the result. Er... again, no.

'...So what were the numbers in the Senate?
The upper house is split 51-49 in favour of the Republicans and the vote was largely along party lines.
In the end, there was indeed a two-vote margin, the closest nomination vote since 1881.



The only party dissenters were Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, who had intended to vote no, and Democrat Joe
Manchin, who voted yes. That should have meant a 51-49 tally, but the absence of Republican Steve Daines, a yes voter
who was at his daughter's wedding, altered the final figures.
Ms Murkowski opted instead to simply mark herself as "present", leaving the final vote 50-48...'

Really...? No paragraph on Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick's accusations? We've been led to believe that  people
outside the Supreme Court building are revolting about Kavanaugh being a serial sexual predator and the lack of old white
men believing the women making the accusations.

Who gives a crap about being signed-in as a Supreme Court Judge, the outrage is about the crimes he's been accused of,
isn't it? Come on BBC, don't let the females down now.

'...What was said in the Senate?
In their final summations, the two Senate party leaders reflected how bitter the divide had become.

Minority Democrat leader Chuck Schumer said Mr Kavanaugh did not belong on the bench as he had "obscured his views
to the American people", "repeatedly misled the Senate" and delivered one of the "bitterest and most partisan testimonies
ever presented by a nominee".

He also said Mr Trump had "stooped to new depths" in mocking the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford...'

Ah finally, Chuck Schumer sounds like the only rational voice in this brouhaha of political chess-playing. The women that
have been physically and mentally violated will be safe in Mr. Schumar's hands. One can be assured that a criminal court
proceedings will coming soon and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will have to answer for their deliberate failings or
even, cover-up.

'...Mr Schumer said that for all those who opposed the nomination, "there is one answer - vote" in the November mid-term
elections...'

Oh, well maybe not.

'...Majority Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Mr Kavanaugh was a "serious scholar, a brilliant student of the law and
a meticulous and dedicated public servant". He said events had "strained our basic principles of fairness and justice" and
that the vote showed the Senate was "an institution where evidence and facts matter".
He spoke of "intimidation by the mob" and said the Senate vote should be one "to turn away from darkness".

Ms Murkowski had earlier said that although Mr Kavanaugh was a "good man", he was "not the right person for the court at
this time" and his "appearance of impropriety has become unavoidable". Joe Manchin is facing a difficult re-election campaign
in West Virginia, a traditionally Republican state that Mr Trump won by a landslide.
He said he "found Judge Kavanaugh to be a qualified jurist".

There were shouts of "shame" from the public gallery as he voted yes...'

'Shame' -for what?!! Blasy Ford's miraculous healing from being unable to fly?
The two doors on her house argued for four years after she'd originally had them installed?
The total lack of witnesses to the alleged assault.
The timing-problem with the alleged crime and the opening of the Safeway Store where she'd seen Mark Judge after the
alleged assault.
Julie Swetnick's belief that standing next to a punch-bowl is evidence that you're not only applying alcohol to the bowl, you're
also in a queue for gang-raping. Actions that others she'd testified were there, denied.
Deborah Ramirez's accusation of Kavanaugh wagging his penis at her, an act so engraved into her memory that she had to
phone around her friends and ask if they could reinforce that memory.

Oh yes, the word 'shame' can be used.

'...Two Republican waverers, Susan Collins and Jeff Flake, finally decided to back the judge.'

Aw yeah, I forgot... we're still doing the Senate vote-thing and women used in this battle are cast aside.
However, I'm sure the BBC will help us to salve our rage that these poor females -the real reason for the media circus,
can have their say.

Analysis: Just the beginning
By Anthony Zurcher, BBC North America reporter

'Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court has been decided. The political war, however, is just beginning.

Donald Trump's court pick generated a controversy that captured the nation's attention in a way that few political issues do.
It generated daily headlines rivalled only by the US quadrennial presidential elections.
Now that the bombs have been thrown, it's time to assess the fallout...'

Well, apart from the threat at the beginning and end, that was a waste of time.
Let's hope Mr. Zurcher can explain the disgraceful act of ignoring the distraught women that Kavanaugh is supposed to have
used.

Why is the court so important?
'Basically, it's the final arbiter of US law.

It has the ultimate say on such contentious issues as abortion and gun control.
The Democrats are still smarting from the previous Supreme Court appointment.
Republicans last year successfully stalled the process, meaning it fell to Mr Trump, not Barack Obama, to nominate the new
justice. Mr Trump's choice of Neil Gorsuch strengthened the conservative leaning.

All eyes will now be on November's mid-term elections. Mr Trump will be able to campaign on the back of an important victory,
but commentators will be watching closely how the Kavanaugh affair affects women voters...'

BBC:

Cheers Anthony, that helped.