Rogue-Nation3
Firms that paid for Clinton speeches have US gov't interests - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com)
+-- Forum: Rogue Politics (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Election 2016 ! (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-17.html)
+--- Thread: Firms that paid for Clinton speeches have US gov't interests (/thread-48.html)



Firms that paid for Clinton speeches have US gov't interests - senona - 05-20-2016

[Image: 3nfwdj5.png]

In this June 25, 2014 file photo, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a question and answer session with Jim Greenwood, President and CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Organization at the BIO International Convention in San Diego. An Associated Press review finds that most companies and groups that paid for speeches by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lobbied federal agencies. More than one-third are government contractors. Their interests would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi, File)




This is nothing illegal, mind you
But more to do with ethics and what would Hillary promise them once in office, being as she has already proven to favor many that have lobbied


Quote:It's not just Wall Street banks. Most companies and groups that paid Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors, an Associated Press review has found. Their interests are sprawling and would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall.

The AP's review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have actively sought to sway the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy and in some cases contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself during her tenure as secretary of state.

Presidents are not generally bound by many of the ethics and conflict-of-interest regulations that apply to non-elected executive branch officials, although they are subject to laws covering related conduct, such as bribery and illegal gratuities. Clinton's 94 paid appearances over two years on the speech circuit leave her open to scrutiny over decisions she would make in the White House or influence that may affect the interests of her speech sponsors.


News Source


This alone just goes to show how closely tied Hillary is to Wall Street, as Sanders and the Republicans have mentioned, and doubt that she would do anything to them.


Quote:Clinton has said she can be trusted to spurn her donors on critical issues, noting that President Barack Obama was tough on Wall Street despite his prolific fundraising there. But her earnings of more than $21.6 million from such a wide range of interest groups could affect public confidence in her proclaimed independence.

"The problem is whether all these interests who paid her to appear before them will expect to have special access when they have an issue before the government," said Lawrence M. Noble, general counsel of the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington-based election watchdog group.


Yep, Hillary will always be under scrutiny if she were to win, to see what-- if anything-- she does when these special interest groups come to her "expecting" something in return


Say 'NO' to Hillary
She is never going to change and this is one example of the baggage hanging over her
Along with the emails, improper server usage, Benghazi etc etc

Just another establishment D.C. player



#NeverHillary
#CrookedHillary

.....