Propaganda watch - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation3 (https://rogue-nation3.com) +-- Forum: Rogue Politics (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Political News and more (https://rogue-nation3.com/forum-16.html) +--- Thread: Propaganda watch (/thread-383.html) |
RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 09-25-2018 (09-01-2018, 04:22 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: I'm not a fan of Bill Clinton, but he's actually doing what most men do, admiring the female form. I vaguely know who Ariana Grande is from the UK-Manchester concert bombing and she seems to hold a current style of attractiveness for males. I would like to write that Clinton is probably play-acting to indicate his marvel for the alleged singer, but he's always been one for perceiving women as mere vessels for his lust and has no regard for their status as a human-being. 'You better get some ice on that.' I know that it isn't in vogue at the moment and there's a level of decorum that we're supposed to adhere to, but Bill Clinton in the above image is doing something that is built-in to the male-psyche, checking for fat-distribution and being mentally-held by the age-old approach to mounting a female in a way that is deemed normal in the natural world. It's coarse to speak like this -I know, and it also dilutes the in-group, out-group situation on discussion sites such as Rogue Nation, but it's real and what concerns me-personally is -not only the belligerent manner that Bill Clinton interacts with females, but his assumption that he can do it and get away with it because he simply believes he's better than his victims. Maybe Amaterasu Solar was correct when he called them all psychopaths! We need to to get out of this pretentious sphere of being outraged at the basic make-up of men and women and get back to what a civilised society takes as 'normal'. The whole dichotomy of sexual behavior has been compressed into pockets of innuendo and maybes, a corralled system where real sexual predators can enjoy the foggy hunting-grounds of 'How-Dare-You'-ness where the bleating weak roam. I agree an ex-President should hold himself to a higher standard than a leering cigar-case-wielding freak who married something that's supposed to be a woman, the post of a leader has qualities that demands the bearer to carry them for the rest of their lives. Clinton -both of them in fact, degraded his position just like many noted leaders have all around the world. Men are men and women are women. For the media, anything in between usually has some-sort of lurid sexual connotation to it for ratings-value only. The problem with this is it promotes negative conduct and debatable practices for the sole reason of keeping the media employed and by doing so, implies it's acceptable. You'll notice that they never bring a guy onto the stage that's called 'Joe' and he's a mechanic who's married with a couple of kids and hasn't done anything outrageous or holds what they consider intrigue. Being a standard part of a community isn't sexy... isn't 'news' anymore. Being a male in a dress visiting one of Target's unisex toilets is. It's simply because people with a certain view on the world think everyone else around them thinks that way. But it's never worked like that, some are good and kind, others prey on the blindness to evil actions. People can be good and people can be bad, there's no divine system that can stop us from crossing the agreed societal lines. All we can do is try to get along with each other in a non-destructive way. Hence my Username, it confuses people on the internet with what reality really is! I ain't a boy and I don't wear a dress! (But Bill is still a pervert.) RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 09-25-2018 (09-24-2018, 11:27 PM)Armonica_Templar Wrote: ....I think that the comic book industry has adapted to appeal to wider audience that includes more minority Right there is the true reason why the 'Comicgate' and the 'Gamergate' situations arose. But if you tell the buyer the real reason it might effect ones livelihood and so a supposed 'higher' reason was created. Of course there are people who can latch onto the idea that comics were catering for a certain select group and they were catering for a select group, but it had nothing to do with gender or race, it was to do with their market location. Girls bought girl's magazines because the contents were for a generic girl to appreciate. The same went for 'action' comics and boys. A simple struggling medium used a blown-up outrage-provoking narrative which saw the opportunity for a power-grab to salve their undeveloped emotions and the comic-industry ran with it. The same comic-businesses believed that for a short time, it would promote their products in minority sections, develop their characters to cater for these communities and the die-hard regular readers would assume it's just part of a changing paradigm and continue to purchase their favourite comics. What they didn't figure on was that for large sections of their customers, they'd see the 'take-over' and openly rebel or just move-off to another interest. The indifferent and neutral owners of comic companies were hoping that the change may initially take-up any shortfall and then quietly move their story-lines back to near where they were and just encompass a larger 'diverse' readership. What they also didn't take into consideration was the actual power-grab by certain parties that was based on a belief and not preference. ............................................. Peter Parker was a character, he wasn't white or black, gay or straight... he is an imaginary persona that was used in exciting adventures that offered the grey-areas of decision-making in adulthood that lay ahead for the young reader. That's it. If he'd been Peter Parker, the scrounging photographer living hand-to-mouth, getting only part-time employment from The Daily Bugle and struggling to get Mary-Jane to put-out for him, the bored customers would've moved to something more interesting and Ditko would've dumped the character. However, if you're a young person with emotions that don't fit into the accepted norms of Parker, The Reeds and Bruce Wayne, then melodramatically -you're the outsider with the natural need to be part of a group. What better way than taking a group, demanding via emotional taboo of certain prejudices and discrimination that this group conform to your own beliefs without any resistance. And quickly adding that to resist this change proves you adhere to accepted negative societal norms. It enforces your own confidence that you're correct and offers a section of villains that you can fight for your 'cause' with. It ensures that you will be a 'comrade', part of something and as the adult-world awaits, you no longer feel alone. Yer' know... the way young people have always felt when they're told to put their toys away and be an adult. Bolstering ones doubts brings great benefits to a kid who sees the daunting prospect of failing in a world where you're told you're supposed to succeed in. Comics never dealt with real life head-on, the world on those pages spoke of heroism, bravery and gaining faith in oneself through pious actions that helped others. It had nothing to do with immature confusion about a changing body and adolescent concerns of how the world works. It's just sad that make-believe has become believe. RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 11-13-2018 At the request of Mystic Wanderer, here's a fine example of two things... media manipulation and the hoped-for influencing of the dumbed-down public by using a deceitful argument. Whatever the preferred narrative is, those on platforms to deliver their one-sided opinions believe that their viewers/readers accept will not perceive the obvious chicanery. It's small-minded, schoolyard outrage, Jerry Springer used to do it years ago and it's called entertainment. The obvious narcissism of the subjects are used by CNN to maintain the divisiveness of the masses. This network is basically the a propaganda outlet, a funded group to assist a preferred political party and broadcast biased information. Governments will never get it correct for everybody and with the assistance of managing trigger-words, speaking over each other to imply intrigue and subtle camera positioning, many of the mainstream medias won't acknowledge that their failing ratings are due to to entering the arena of entertainment. Advertising themselves as bastions of the truth and yet -offering false and misleading information, they can be accused of being 'the enemy of the people'. But remember, many of the presenters do it just to pay their bills, they don't care about what they broadcast and neither should you. Governments come and go, but these guys will always need your eyes or be out of work. Hence they bombard their customers with figures that the MSM believe are victims of being alive. These known are the 'good' people. The presumed -and constantly proclaimed villains are Nazis, the Klu-Klux Clan and any male with white skin. A narrative that would look fine in one of Stan Lee's comics. Which again, shows you how the media perceive their customers as children who cannot distinguish between reality and fiction. Youtube, Google and others are private companies, it would pay a person to realise that at some point, these outlets will also fail due to their ever-changing terms of service. Maybe not in China or other countries where free speech is harnessed, but things will change. One day, Rogue Nation will called upon to help those lost in the maze of managed-confusion!! RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 11-30-2018 I can't decide if it's due to the trendy 'Any-Advertising-Is-Good-Advertising' or my red-pill is really kicking in, but with the BBC trying this latest sh*t, I'm rapidly losing faith and thinking that the television is nothing more than a dust collector. 'Newsnight' is a late-night programme on the BBC's second-channel BBC2 that was usually confined to the more refined who enjoyed shows that portrayed upper-middle class folk going about their typical environment. When I was young, it mainly broadcast English cricket all mid-morning and afternoon, an ideal time to watch the sport if you worked in the Houses of Parliament! The programme 'Newsnight' supposedly entertains its viewers with angled commentary about current political issues and certainly leans left in its values. And maybe the key-word is 'entertain'. Quote:Did BBC hire a 'fake vicar' to back May's Brexit deal on Newsnight?DailyMail: Like others in the comment section of The Daily Mail, I questioned her gender more than her fake impression on the BBC programme! But why would you contact an agency for access to a Vicar? RE: Propaganda watch - Wallfire - 11-30-2018 She said: 'I was not paid by the BBC . They did not pay me. I was contacted by an independent organisation and asked to appear.I have nothing more to say' Im not sure what this means ??? Does it mean that some one payed her to be there and give a POV, was the POV one that was paid for or her own ???? Why would she not tell who the "independent organisation" was. It seems to me she is LGBTQA ( the A standing for A little b lost ) RE: Propaganda watch - Mystic Wanderer - 12-09-2018 Interesting. So the fake news is trying to control what other countries think of President Trump too. Here is what one person from across the pond had to say on Twitter: Quote:Omnicentrist ⛔️??? @Omnicentrist 8h8 hours ago Notice this headline: Donald Trump has been tied to a federal crime by prosecutors. Can a president be indicted? But, once you get into the article, it states, "Although Mr Trump hasn't been charged with anything, the question of whether a president even can be prosecuted while in office is a matter of legal dispute." If you wish to read this rag, here's the link: LINK RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 12-29-2018 Thanks to Mystic Wanderer for the Heads-Up on this one. Misunderstood Person Dealing With Transgender Pathology, A Fruitcake Or Just Some More Constructed News? Quote:'LET'S TAKE IT OUTSIDE!' Furious transgender woman threatens shop worker after he calls her ‘sir’ not ‘maam’The Sun: The 'outraged' person in question isn't identified and considering Albuquerque is dealing with a blizzard right now, the same person doesn't looked dressed for such wintery conditions. It seems convenient that somebody happened to be filming the sudden upset, however, I've checked the standard news outlets around Albuquerque and there's no mention of the incident! I can understand how local news -who's agendas may be different form the major mainstream medias, could look on it as not newsworthy, but then again it's basically click-bait for a region and could bring in some custom, at least. But the blonde-haired person... I was sure I'd seen 'it' before. Quote:Ben Shapiro Files Police Report Against Transgender Reporter Zoey Tur.Breitbart: This happened back in July of 2015 and I never gave it another thought until I saw the image of the angry 'thing' ripping into the kid at the store. The clothing colours are the same as Zoey Tur and the hairstyle is similar. But it maybe it's just a fan of the American broadcast reporter and doesn't enjoy living in reality anymore. I'd wager it's the annual slow-news-time during the holiday period and so, news has to be drummed-up! What do you think? ............................... Here's another anomaly in the news realm. With the banal manner that news is reported, it always makes me grimace when an article arises that misses out so much and relies on the trending impact of fear. Three informative -yet stunted, sentences that explain the story, three... then repeated three times! Quote:Man, 32, is arrested on suspicion of 'Syria-related' terror offences after landing at Luton AirportDaily Mail: An article that warrants releasing and yet, holds no information of any value. I don't expect the suspect's name to be released due to no definite evidence proving guilt, but... Where did he fly from...? how was the fare paid? Why didn't authorities from that country arrest him before allowing a terrorist get on the plane? Yer' know... questions a Journalist would ask. This unknown person -who is suspected of preparing for terrorist acts, is allowed to fly from an unstated country (inbound?!) and only when he's arrested, does the information find its way to a mainstream news outlet. Where did he fly from? Terrorism... 'the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.' or the act of bringing fear to a party by indicating violence and loss. Did this person fly from Syria to London? No, there are no direct flights from Syria to the UK. He's committed no crime in the United Kingdom and is only arrested due to 'Syria-related offences' in Syria. I can understand if he fled Syria after commiting such offences, but this unknown didn't flee to Luton Airport... and he came from somewhere else. Quote:'The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) advise against all travel to Syria.UK GOV: With the lack of information within the article, is this really news or just another push of the fear narrative? RE: Propaganda watch - Mystic Wanderer - 12-29-2018 Quote:This happened back in July of 2015 and I never gave it another thought until I saw the image of the angry 'thing' Thank you for bringing this to our attention @"BIAD". It certainly does look like the same "it", and as you stated, it was convenient that a camera was rolling inside the store too. Possibly someone trying to stir up the transgender community, or maybe "it" was just seeking attention. It's a crazy world out there! RE: Propaganda watch - guohua - 12-29-2018 @"BIAD" and @"Mystic Wanderer" I think "It" was seeking attention. When None Was Needed. Many just bring attention to themselves by their walk, talk and attitude! Yes, it's JMHO. RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 12-30-2018 I must admit, one of my failings is to peruse tabloids like The Daily Star and The Sun. You're always guaranteed to read over-sensationalised articles that have little meaning in the broad context of human societies, but they do imply having a simplistic barometer of 'good and evil' is a better way to conduct one's lifestyle. Words like 'outraged' and 'menace' -usually in capital letters, draws the reader into a world of vice, corruption and a strange metaphysical tempo that indicates an ironic scheme that only the virtuous can ignore -yet appreciate. However, another theme runs alongside the gaudy stories and just by accident, I came across it many years ago when I worked in the newspaper business. That of a pair of breasts being worth more than a murder. ....................... Over a quarter of a century ago in a small isolated property close to where I live, a pretty forty-four year-old married mother-of-three lady decided to grab some sun on the large grounds of her luxury home on the outskirts of a small town. It was a wealthy family with a husband who had children from a former marriage and ran a local haulage business. The house stood alone between a town and a small village where her husband's company was situated. A long driveway came from the busy road that connected the town to the village and a developing airport. Open fields surrounded the property and there were no neighbours, the woman must've appreciated the privacy and in her bikini, settled down to acquire a rare tan from the summer sun. It was the hottest day of August 1990 and sometime in the late afternoon, the woman decided she'd had done enough sun-bathing for the day and retired to her cooler lounge, still in her bikini. Around 6.00.pm, her husband of four years came back from his business and discovered his wife with her throat cut and in a pool of blood. The radio was still playing, the dog asleep outside and the dead woman's bikini-bottom had been removed. There were no signs of a sex crime, nothing had been taken to imply a robbery and the pathologist stated there was no indications of a struggle or being beaten. No weapon was found, which the same pathologist believed was a Stanley-knife type or a cut-throat razor. The murder hit the headlines and became national news. The deceased lady's husband became the suspect in the media's eyes and even though a passing truck driver reported seeing a blue car leaving the peaceful driveway at around the time of the killing, it was the husband who took the brunt of the accusations. A friend of mine had been a photographer at where I was working and decided to seek his fame and fortune in London. Pay was -and still is, higher in the capital and just like Dick Whittington, set out to improve his future. That aspiration led him to the doors of a well-known newspaper, The Sun. Back then, page three of the tabloid offered its readers a topless model and it wouldn't be until 2015 that the company agreed that having a bare-breasted female staring out at its customers above a serious article about the struggles of the United Kingdom, was not true journalism. But titillation doesn't go easy into the night and when a Sun Reporter was asked to visit the area of the murder to write a story with something extra for its readers, my friend -the photographer, was also dispatched to get some 'appropriate images' for the paper and to utilise his home-grown knowledge. I spoke to him after he and his fellow-hearsay-monger had gathered what they'd believed was enough to get the Reporter a column or two in The Sun and he explained how the word 'tawdry' was still alive and well in Fleet Street. By this time, it had been rumoured that the husband of the murdered woman had been having an affair with a barmaid from a nearby golf-club and this morsel of gossip was enough to find the eager Sun Reporter and his camera-carrying cohort knocking on the door of a woman twenty-three years younger than the man who was supposed to be her lover. The Reporter and his side-kick were invited in using the assurance that 'her side of the story' should be told to let the readers know that in no way, was she any type of chess-piece on this particular board. They chatted and when discussing how optics were vital to show the lover-barmaid's explanation of how the tryst with the murdered woman's husband was ending, the Reporter suggested a photograph would go a long way to enhance her innocent position in this incident That's when the photo-albums came out. Pictures of the barmaid were displayed and it was only when one particular snapshot showed the young woman at a fancy-dress party in a fetching basque-and-suspenders outfit, did the Reporter bring up the subject of money. One hundred pounds was the first offer for the sexy image and after consulting with his London-based Editor on the telephone, the Reporter push to two hundred as a begrudging submission to the barmaid. What she didn't know was that the Editor had said that no more than three hundred pounds could be used obtaining for the revealing print. She took the two-hundred quid and I know for a fact how much the Reporter said he'd spent on the photograph and it was exactly what the Editor had warned. The picture showed up the next day in an editorial that basically condemned the husband and his family to a further tirade of accusations. The company Director and the saucy thigh-showing Barmaid... nectar for the tabloids. And that's what I meant about 'titillation', if you look today at certain mainstream media websites, the many articles offer female semi-nude imagery and paparazzi-style photographs of celebrities in sparse clothing. The murdered woman's husband was charged with the crime and then due to failure of solid evidence, was dropped. The family members were broken because of suspicion in-and-out of their circle that one of their own could be the killer and of course, moving away from the area was a must. As of this writing, nobody has been found for the murder. Still, the newspaper got its photograph and that's what really important, eh? RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 12-31-2018 Reality calling... when will the MSM get their act together...? RE: Propaganda watch - Mystic Wanderer - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 12:38 PM)BIAD Wrote: Reality calling... when will the MSM get their act together...? This should show people around the world that the same people are organizing and funding all the chaos. It's the same in America. I'll be very happy to see the day when these evil demons are knocked off their pedestal. I hope the people never give up fighting to get their country back. RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-02-2019 Isn't it strange? Sky News's report on the Manchester stabbing incident. '...A 25-year-old man has been detained under the Mental Health Act and is now in a secure medical facility...' SOURCE: The BBC's report on the London's West End incident. '...A 26-year-old man is in custody at a central London police station...' and '...A 34-year-old man initially arrested on suspicion of attempted murder has been released on bail until mid-January, the police said...' BBC: Sky News's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident. '...The suspect is described as a bearded white man, possibly in his 40s...' Sky News: BBC's report on the Texas seven-year-od shooting incident. '...Authorities say the unidentified gunman is a bearded white male in his 40s, wearing a red sweatshirt...' Beebs: RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-03-2019 The BBC have a web page that reports this below and it's connected to one of the quotes from above. Yet, it doesn't make sense! Quote:Abu Hamza's son facing firearms charge So the article indicates a connection between the men who killed the security guard at the night-club. The son of a radical cleric, the murdered security guard and the possession of a firearm, sounds simple. But then why this? Quote:'...The Met Police said the charges related to an incident at Fountain House at about 05:35 GMT in which noBBC: The Daily Star make the incident a little clearer... Quote:'...But officers say the charges have been brought in connection with a separate incident at But still get their raunchy habit in! Quote:'...Tudor was manning the door to an alleged private sex party when the attack took place onThe Daily Star: There's more to this incident than meets the eye. RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-04-2019 Like all mainstream medias, the same reports are displayed and usually in the same order. Conclusions are drawn within a minute-or-two by the presenter's presentation of the information and we all are supposed to confidently nod that everything that's offered is true and unbiased. Except... it's what is missing that can have a bearing too. These days, we're asked to believe that white men are oppressing women at every opportunity and if an article offers room for such a suggestion, the mainstream media will not falter in driving their agenda onward. These masters of narrative also believe that Governments should control your children's conduct and once again, if there's an opening to tell you that they know better, they'll tell you. The report below is a harmless one, the British Medical Journal -now called 'The BMJ', says its findings show that an average use of devices -such as cell phones and tablets that have screens, cause little harm to the young in general. But there are other screens, namely television screens and oddly enough, this BBC article misses certain findings of the same BMJ out of their account. I wonder why? Quote:Worry less about children's screen use, parents told.LINK: See...? there's a link to the open medical journal where a diligent parent can check to see the results of these tests, but there's no link to where the evidence is that girls are worse victims than boys. And I'd wager the Journalist's finger tarried over the keyboard on whether to adjust the statement to 'white boys'! Quote:'...'No evidence of being toxic' Remember that second sentence, I'll post at the bottom what the BMJ actually said. Quote:'....But the college looked at this and said it was not clear from the evidence if higher screen use was causing these There's a segment on what parents say and recommendations of not using 'devices' that are obvious. The final few sentences are where the majority of the mainstream media wriggle out of they've implied earlier and the BBC is no exception. Quote:'Social media and young people You can click on the link, but it doesn't lead to an academic page that has any bearing on the subject! Here we go with the back-tracking Quote:'...It is separate to the RCPCH guidance on screen use and the review that informed it, neither of which looked at social mediaBBC: Which is strange considering the BBC stated: '...Meanwhile, a separate study has found that girls are twice as likely to show signs of depressive symptoms linked to social media use at age 14 compared with boys...' But that was in the form of a dig at males and not backed-up with science. But all of this is about screens. Screens, screens screens. And is there a difference in effects when looking at different types of screens? Here are some other findings the report showed and oddly enough, not offered in the above article. Quote:'The great majority of findings related to television screentime. Tremblay et al 10 reported a moderate association between Quote:'...We conclude there is moderately strong evidence that higher television screentime is associated with greater adiposity, Quote:'...We conclude there is moderate evidence for an association between screentime, particularly television screentime, You'll notice that in the BBC article, they never used the word 'television' and stuck with 'devices'. We tend not to think of a television-set being a device, more like a piece of furniture or appliance. Screen time on a television comes-off as a negative and British Broadcasting Company failed to show their readers and viewers that... I wonder why?!!! RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-05-2019 (01-02-2019, 10:25 PM)BIAD Wrote: Isn't it strange? (Caveat. Not a racial slur, merely a comment on the political correctness that infests the media) Remember I posted the above? The reason was because of a developing incident where a 51 year-old man was on a train in the UK with his young son when the father was attacked by an unknown person and violently stabbed to death. The mainstream media reported it and used words like 'suspect' and 'attacker' whilst refraining from describing the person -who for a while, was still on the loose. In some of the media, they said the suspect 'wore black clothing, but to his skin-colour... it remained unsaid. The BBC's latest report is this: Quote:Surrey train stabbing: Suspect arrested along with a womanBBC: The last comment tells you how far we in the UK have fallen when advice that you're probably safe from attacks on a train and ignores that it smacks of third-world behavior. But anyway, there was no description of the victim or the attacker and I wondered why. The Daily Star reported on the same day as the BBC's article, but the arrest hadn't happened yet. Quote:Train murder as dad killed in front of son, 14 – hunt for knifeman ongoingDaily Star: And there it is. The fear of negatively portraying a no-borders, social-accepting diversity belief demands that the BBC lies to its readers. No warnings that the fleeing suspect was dangerous because when the whole story is revealed, it may imply all black people are dangerous and that's the thought-process of the child-like deceptive British Broadcasting Company. A description may have aided the suspect's capture, but political correctness requires a higher standing than public safety in the BBC's eyes. This is why the Donald says 'Fake News'. RE: Propaganda watch - Mystic Wanderer - 01-05-2019 The Deep State Propaganda has gotten so bad it caused a senior reporter to quit at NBC, one of the top fake news sites. Quote:A senior NBC reporter has quit the news network over their obsession with promoting pro-war Deep State propaganda twenty-four hours a day. I'm glad to see there are still some people who refuse to "sell their soul to the devil" all in the name of putting an extra dollar in their pocket. Quote:William M. Arkin, a veteran national security reporter, wrote a scathing farewell message to his colleagues, warning them that NBC has given endless war and ‘destructive’ intelligence agencies a free pass due to their around-the-clock anti-Trump hysteria.Source RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-05-2019 William Arkin is bang-on the money, I just have to wonder how many like him are still in the news-rooms, but don't have the balls to walk. RE: Propaganda watch - BIAD - 01-07-2019 After capture -and avoiding arrest with the aid of a female friend, the BBC reported on the quick court case. However, on the television broadcast the auto-cue was set at: '...suspect accused of an alleged stabbing' instead of 'Darren Pencille accused of stabbing the victim'! So at least we know who types this stuff... leftists! Quote:Surrey train stabbing: Murder accused appears in courtBBC: The rest is in regards of the victim... the one that was stabbed to death, that is. Lee Pomeroy was on a train with his 14-year-old son when he was stabbed. RE: Propaganda watch - Mystic Wanderer - 01-07-2019 From above post: Quote:He told Staines magistrates: "Innocent until proven guilty," adding: "I'm paranoid. I'm hearing voices." There's those "voices" again. Q posted about this today; not this story, but the MKUltra programs. Interesting! Click on the links in the Q post to read articles on this. Quote:Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82bacc No.4639875 |