Rogue-Nation3

Full Version: Wikileaks just dumped a bunch of dirt on our favorit corrupt idiots
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
 

Wikileaks just dumped all of their files online. Everything from Hillary Clinton's emails, McCain's being guilty, Vegas shooting done by an FBI sniper, Steve Jobs HIV letter, PedoPodesta, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Bilderberg, CIA agents arrested for rape, WHO pandemic. Happy Digging! Here you go, please read and pass it on..... https://file.wikileaks.org/file/

These are Clinton’s emails; https://file.wikileaks.org/file/clinton-emails/

Index file; https://file.wikileaks.org/file/?fbclid=...bM46oHXWMI
Thanks Sky and I think I've just found what I'll spend most of 2021 investigating!

The 'Pizzagate' discussion that was mocked for it's juvenile 'scare-'em' tactics seemed to be dead-on
with what many were saying were symbols being used by these perverts to identify each other.

Pedo Symbols:
................................................................

And this one I found interesting too. It's an example of how infiltration of respected military groups
by street-gangs.

Military 'Street-Gang' Organisations:


Thanks again Sky and my new year looks very interesting!
(01-03-2021, 11:28 AM)BIAD Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks Sky and I think I've just found what I'll spend most of 2021 investigating!

The 'Pizzagate' discussion that was mocked for it's juvenile 'scare-'em' tactics seemed to be dead-on
with what many were saying were symbols being used by these perverts to identify each other.

Pedo Symbols:
................................................................

And this one I found interesting too. It's an example of how infiltration of respected military groups
by street-gangs.

Military 'Street-Gang' Organisations:


Thanks again Sky and my new year looks very interesting!

I don't know much about Wiki-leaks or Q. I have never been able to trust all the fan-fare that usually accompanies the projections.

But I too found the section of your post about gang presence in the military, interesting, because I was in the military way back in the early eighties, and I remember hearing scuttlebutt about how the Klan had infiltrated some areas of the military, way back then, so I am not at all surprised to have read this

Quote:UNCLASSIFIED//LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE (U) Introduction (U) Gang-related activity in the US Armed Forces is increasing. Although gang members constitute only a fraction of military personnel nationwide, their presence can compromise installation security and force protection both internally and externally. Gang members in the military can disrupt good order and discipline and threaten military operations. Gang membership in the ranks may also result in a disruption of command, low morale, disciplinary problems, and a broad range of criminal activity. Gang-affiliated military personnel and dependent gang-affiliated children of service members facilitate crime on and off military installations, and are at risk of transferring their weapons and combat training back to the community to employ against rival gang members and law enforcement officers. (U) Prevalence of Gang Members in the Military (U) Members of nearly every major street gang, including the Bloods, Crips, Black Disciples, Gangster Disciples, Hells Angels, Latin Kings, The 18thStreet Gang, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Mexican Mafia, Nortenos, Surenos, Vice Lords, and various white supremacist groups, have been documented on military installations both domestically and internationally. These members are present in most branches and across all ranks of the military, but are most common among the junior enlisted ranks. The US Army, Army Reserves, and National Guard are likely to have the most enlisted gang members because they are either the largest branches of the military, the service is part-time, or they tend not to be as selective as the other branches of the armed services. Estimates are difficult to obtain because many gang-related incidences are reported as conduct matters and are not within the investigative purview of criminal investigative services. However, the US Army’s recent adoption of the National Crime Information Center definition of “gangs” and “gang membership” may contribute to an increase in reporting of gang-related incidents.1

I am believe there is some truth to this, and it has been going on for a very long time. It would explain why some of the military bases and some of the police departments, have as many problems as they do. Gangs are a lot more far reaching and sophisticated than the average person gives them credit for.

All they have to do is take a more realistic and clearer look at the mafia, then at our government.

Wallfire

In Europe there are 3 main groups who use the armys training, The right, the Left and the muslims. They all want training and understanding how the army will react in urban war fare. The drug dealers are mostly the Africans and muslims.
When it kicks of here it will be interesting.
Thanks @"727Sky".  smallgreenbananadancer


As much as I scour the internet/social media, I have not seen this yet, and am just now seeing your post.

This will give me something to do on these rainy, boring Sundays.

AWESOME!   smallawesome
I have the same thing as @"NightskyeB4Dawn"  "I don't know much about Wiki-leaks or Q."

However, they kind of have my interest. So i will do what i always do when these leaks come. I will wait. I will wait for the wiser ones, and those who have longer attention span, to investigate it. Then they write about the key things and discuss them. And i draw my conclusions from there.
(01-03-2021, 06:02 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know much about Wiki-leaks or Q. I have never been able to trust all the fan-fare that usually accompanies the projections.

@"NightskyeB4Dawn",

Wiki-leaks has nothing to do with Q. Nor does Q have anything to do with Pizza-gate.
The whole pizza-gate topic came on the scene long before Q ever posted on the boards. The media were the ones who connected the two to try to make the Q Anons look crazy.
To this day people are still connecting the two together, so I guess they accomplished their mission.
That's what the media does; they lie and do smear campaigns on anything that tells the truth about the corruption in our world, and the people behind it.
(01-03-2021, 07:15 PM)Mystic Wanderer Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-03-2021, 06:02 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know much about Wiki-leaks or Q. I have never been able to trust all the fan-fare that usually accompanies the projections.

@"NightskyeB4Dawn",

Wiki-leaks has nothing to do with Q. Nor does Q have anything to do with Pizza-gate.
The whole pizza-gate topic came on the scene long before Q ever posted on the boards. The media were the ones who connected the two to try to make the Q Anons look crazy.
To this day people are still connecting the two together, so I guess they accomplished their mission.
That's what the media does; they lie and do smear campaigns on anything that tells the truth about the corruption in our world, and the people behind it.

I agree that the media and the internet has been quite successful at getting people to not just believe, but invest, in what they want us to. They have taught me to trust none of them, and the more they are pushed and paid to influence how I think or feel, the less I trust them.

But my goal for the new year is to avoid as much of the BS as I can. My plate is full, and I plan to make the best that I can, out of the here and now. I hope to use my time, energy and gifting, in the present. I will participate in threads that I find interesting, were I may be able to share, hopefully, useful information, but I plan to avoid any political threads. I know that will greatly restrict my participation on the internet, but I am hoping that will be a good thing.

I am not pointing fingers and I sure don't want to come across as unrealistic, or dismissive, but I just don't want to start my year repeating the same things that got nowhere last year.

I am not dragging any of the past with me that I can avoid. I don't see me becoming a follower of Q or Wiki-leaks. in 2021, though I may find some material attributed to them interesting.